- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

by Nagal, Amit

Hi, Referring https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/docs/getti… it says : ``FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT``: ARMv8.4 extensions introduced support for fault injection from lower Els. Referring https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/lib/el3_ru… FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT enables FIEN bit. #if FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT /* Enable fault injection from lower ELs */ scr_el3 |= SCR_FIEN_BIT; #endif Question : 1. Do we have any relevant documentation from arm which specifies FIEN bit can be enabled from armv8.4 ? 2. In cortex a-53 technical reference manual, SCR_EL3 does not have FIEN bit , bit 21 is marked reserved . In cortex a-78 technical reference manual , manual does not have details for SCR_EL3 . I want to know whether on Armv8.2-a based cores like cortex a-78 , is the FIEN bit field marked reserved in SCR_EL3 register or is available functionality wise as in armv8.4 ? Please help with above query. Regards Amit

10 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 2 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 14 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 2 of 2 defect(s) ** CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 133 in cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 133 in cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore() 127 void cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore(void) 128 { 129 unsigned int cluster_pos; 130 131 cluster_pos = (unsigned int) plat_cluster_id_by_mpidr(read_mpidr_el1()); 132 >>> CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> "&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]" evaluates to an address that is at byte offset 138720 of an array of 544 bytes. 133 restore_dsu_pmu_state(&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]); ** CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 81 in cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 81 in cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save() 75 void cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save(void) 76 { 77 unsigned int cluster_pos; 78 79 cluster_pos = (unsigned int) plat_cluster_id_by_mpidr(read_mpidr_el1()); 80 >>> CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> "&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]" evaluates to an address that is at byte offset 138720 of an array of 544 bytes. 81 save_dsu_pmu_state(&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]); 82 } 83 84 /***************************************************************************** 85 * This function, restore_dsu_pmu_state, restores the state of the 86 * Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) from a previously saved state. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 8 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /plat/nxp/s32/s32g274ardb2/plat_console.c: 17 in console_s32g2_register() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /plat/nxp/s32/s32g274ardb2/plat_console.c: 17 in console_s32g2_register() 11 12 void console_s32g2_register(void) 13 { 14 static console_t s32g2_console; 15 int ret; 16 >>> CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) >>> A write to an aggregate overwrites a const-qualified field within the aggregate. 17 (void)memset(&s32g2_console, 0, sizeof(s32g2_console)); 18 19 ret = console_linflex_register(UART_BASE, UART_CLOCK_HZ, 20 UART_BAUDRATE, &s32g2_console); 21 if (ret == 0) { 22 panic(); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 7 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 14 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 7 of 7 defect(s) ** CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 314 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 314 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() 308 } 309 310 exit: 311 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); 312 313 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { >>> CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach this statement: "*plaintext_length = ciphert...". 314 *plaintext_length = ciphertext_length - operation.tag_length; 315 } 316 return status; 317 } 318 319 /* Set the key and algorithm for a multipart authenticated encryption ** CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/x509_crt.c: 2750 in x509_inet_pton_ipv6() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/x509_crt.c: 2750 in x509_inet_pton_ipv6() 2744 MBEDTLS_PUT_UINT16_BE(group, addr, nonzero_groups); 2745 nonzero_groups++; 2746 if (*p == '\0') { 2747 break; 2748 } else if (*p == '.') { 2749 /* Don't accept IPv4 too early or late */ >>> CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach the expression "zero_group_start == -1" inside this statement: "if ((nonzero_groups == 0 &&...". 2750 if ((nonzero_groups == 0 && zero_group_start == -1) || 2751 nonzero_groups >= 7) { 2752 break; 2753 } 2754 2755 /* Walk back to prior ':', then parse as IPv4-mapped */ ** CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 306 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 306 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() 300 (void) additional_data; 301 (void) additional_data_length; 302 (void) plaintext; 303 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 304 } 305 >>> CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *plain...". 306 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 307 *plaintext_length = ciphertext_length - operation.tag_length; 308 } 309 310 exit: 311 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); ** CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 612 in mbedtls_psa_aead_finish() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 612 in mbedtls_psa_aead_finish() 606 (void) tag_size; 607 (void) tag_length; 608 609 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 610 } 611 >>> CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *ciphe...". 612 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 613 /* This will be zero for all supported algorithms currently, but left 614 * here for future support. */ 615 *ciphertext_length = finish_output_size; 616 *tag_length = operation->tag_length; 617 } ** CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 110 in psa_aead_setup() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 110 in psa_aead_setup() 104 default: 105 (void) status; 106 (void) key_buffer; 107 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 108 } 109 >>> CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "operation->key_type = psa_g...". 110 operation->key_type = psa_get_key_type(attributes); 111 112 operation->tag_length = PSA_ALG_AEAD_GET_TAG_LENGTH(alg); 113 114 return PSA_SUCCESS; 115 } ** CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 541 in mbedtls_psa_aead_update() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 541 in mbedtls_psa_aead_update() 535 (void) output; 536 (void) output_size; 537 538 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 539 } 540 >>> CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *outpu...". 541 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 542 *output_length = update_output_length; 543 } 544 545 return status; 546 } ** CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 196 in mbedtls_psa_aead_encrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 196 in mbedtls_psa_aead_encrypt() 190 (void) additional_data; 191 (void) additional_data_length; 192 (void) plaintext; 193 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 194 } 195 >>> CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *ciphe...". 196 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 197 *ciphertext_length = plaintext_length + operation.tag_length; 198 } 199 200 exit: 201 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

11 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) /plat/xilinx/zynqmp/pm_service/zynqmp_pm_api_sys.c: 279 in pm_self_suspend() 273 const struct pm_proc *proc = pm_get_proc(cpuid); 274 275 /* 276 * Do client specific suspend operations 277 * (e.g. set powerdown request bit) 278 */ >>> CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) >>> Dereferencing a pointer that might be "NULL" "proc" when calling "pm_client_suspend". 279 pm_client_suspend(proc, state); 280 /* Send request to the PMU */ 281 PM_PACK_PAYLOAD6(payload, PM_SELF_SUSPEND, proc->node_id, latency, 282 state, address, (address >> 32)); 283 return pm_ipi_send_sync(proc, payload, NULL, 0); 284 } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

11 months

1
0
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum : TF-RMM CPPCheck integration and TF-A-Tests testing

by Soby Mathew

Hi Everyone, This Thursday , Shruti from TF-RMM team will discuss the following topics in TF-A Tech Forum : 1. Integration of CPPCheck in TF-RMM * CPPCheck is an open-source static analyzer with addon MISRA checker. In this talk, we will discuss the CPPCheck integration in TF-RMM build system and demonstrate the same. 2. TF-A-Tests enhancements and testing for TF-RMM * Discuss new enhancements in TF-A-Tests for Realm Payload tests including Creating, Loading & Running Realm Payload, testing multiple Rec’s and PSCI support for Realms. We will also cover some Test framework conventions and aspects of Stage2 Memory Management, Realm Memory Exception Model testing. Best Regards Soby Mathew -----Original Appointment----- From: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings <linaro.org_havjv2figrh5egaiurb229pd8c(a)group.calendar.google.com> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 10:13 PM To: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com; okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com Subject: TF-A Tech Forum When: 02 May 2024 16:00-17:00 Europe/London. Where: TF-A Tech Forum We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this This event has been updated with a note: "Updating invite link" Changed: description Description CHANGED We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trustedfirmware.org%2Fmeetin…> Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvd…<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro-org.zoom.us%2Fmy%2Ftruste…> One tap mobile +16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York) +16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 915 970 4974 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…> When Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday (Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix) Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com<mailto:marek.bykowski@gmail.com> okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com<mailto:okash.khawaja@gmail.com> View all guest info<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> RSVP for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> for all events in this series Yes<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> No<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> Maybe<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> More options<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> Invitation from Google Calendar<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/> You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more<https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.4 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.18 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.18 is now available. This release contains the following patches. a1cb5f656 feat(mbedtls): upgrade to version v2.28.8 [1] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ic1e6debbfc0f5667a8872482ccfb104c1a92e… Thanks, TF-A LTS team

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Need a mechanism to easily define platform-independent SMC FIDs

by Julius Werner

Hi, I would like to restart a discussion that we already had a few years ago on a thread called "SMC to intentionally trigger a panic in TF-A" (https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/search?mlist=tf-a%40lists.truste…) but that petered out without any real resolution (and resulted in me ultimately not implementing the feature I was hoping to add). Basically, we are repeatedly stumbling over the problem that we have a use case for some platform-independent SMC API that we want to implement in TF-A, but don't have an appropriate SMC FID range to put it. My request from a few years ago was about implementing a call to intentionally trigger a panic in TF-A for test-automation purposes. Today we came up with a use case where a Trusted OS wants to query BL31 about the location of a shared log buffer: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/20478 . Currently, the available SMC ranges are Arm, CPU, SiP, OEM, Standard, Hypervisor, TA and TOS. The SiP, OEM and TOS ranges are all specific to a single silicon vendor, OEM or trusted OS implementation, so they are not good targets to implement APIs that would make sense to be shared among multiple of these. In theory, the Standard range would probably be the right target to implement calls that are independently useful for multiple platforms / OSes... but as far as I understand, adding a new call to that range requires petitioning Arm to update the SMC calling convention itself, which is a ridiculously high bar to implement a small utility API. In practice, the only choice we have for implementing these kinds of calls is to let every OEM, SiP or TOS assign its own (different) FID for it and then write separate SMC handlers for each in TF-A that all end up calling the same underlying function... which creates a lot of unnecessary code duplication and identifier soup (especially in the case of SMCs for the non-secure OS which would then be implemented by a platform-independent Linux driver that needs a big mapping table to decide which FID to use on which platform for the same API). I think it would be very useful if there was another range of easily allocatable FIDs that developers could just add to with a simple TF-A CL without having to go through a huge specification update process. There are still 41 OENs unused in the Arm SMCCC, and I don't think any new ones were added in the 10 years that the specification existed... so we are really not going to run out of them any time soon. If we could get even one of those OENs for this purpose, we would have 64K FIDs to use up for our small, simple platform-independent API needs, which should last us a long while. We could maybe call it the "Secure Monitor range" and say the FIDs are specific to a certain implementation of Secure Monitor (e.g. TF-A). Then there could just be a header file in the TF-A sources that serves as the authoritative FID assignment table for TF-A, and anyone with a sufficiently useful idea (subject to TF-A maintainer review) for a platform-independent API like this could add it there by just uploading a patch. I recently argued for a similar "simple tag allocation" concept on https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff and it found support there, so I hope I'll be able to convince you that it would be useful for SMC FIDs as well?

11 months, 2 weeks

3
3
0 0

Re: rk3399 issue: no DMA in Linux with mainline TF-A and U-Boot SPL

by Christoph Fritz

Hello Jonathan and Kevar, > I also see this issue when switching between Rockchip ATF and Upstream ATF. > > Versions: > Rockchip DDR Blob - rk3399_ddr_800MHz_v1.30.bin > Rockchip Miniloader - rk3399_miniloader_v1.30.bin > Rockchip ATF - rk3399_bl31_v1.36.elf > Upstream ATF - git://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git, > git tag v2.8.0, with RK3399_BAUDRATE changed from 115200 to 1500000 in > plat/rockchip/rk3399/rk3399_def.h > U-Boot - git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, git tag v2022.01 > > Results: > Rockchip DDR Blob + Rockchip Miniloader + Rockchip ATF + U-Boot = DMA working > dma-pl330 ff6d0000.dma-controller: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330 > dma-pl330 ff6d0000.dma-controller: DBUFF-32x8bytes Num_Chans-6 > Num_Peri-12 Num_Events-12 > dma-pl330 ff6e0000.dma-controller: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330 > dma-pl330 ff6e0000.dma-controller: DBUFF-128x8bytes > Num_Chans-8 Num_Peri-20 Num_Events-16 > Rockchip DDR Blob + Rockchip Miniloader + Upstream ATF + U-Boot = DMA > not working > OF: amba_device_add() failed (-19) for /bus/dma-controller@ff6d0000 > OF: amba_device_add() failed (-19) for /bus/dma-controller@ff6e0000 > > I can't check the Rockchip ATF source code as it isn't available. > Any idea what is different between Rockchip ATF and Upstream ATF for > DMA to work properly? @Kevar: It would be really great if you could have a look into it. I am still having this issue. Thanks -- Christoph

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A