- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

arm-trustedfirmware whether has unit test

by 郭浙伟(本记)

hi, I has quality engineer from china. I would to start study the Arm profile-A trustedfirmware and try to test it. I has read trustedfirmware documetion , From the Processes & policies Chap about CI part. "https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/process/contributing.htm… " Find ATF has Coverity Scan and test image build. but I would to know, trustedfirmware-a whether has unit test part in the code level quality check. Brs Tony

3 years, 11 months

2
1
0 0

ChangeLog-v2.7

by Jayanth Dodderi Chidanand

Hello All, Kindly take a look at the Changelog section (rendered version) for your respective platforms, as we approach closer to TF-A release v2.7. Please share your comments at review.trustedfirmware.org as we can address them accordingly. External Patch: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/15282 Rendered Version: https://ci-builds.trustedfirmware.org/static-files/La0ImPrSWDqkNWMSfH1vNhIR… Best regards, Jayanth

3 years, 11 months

2
1
0 0

Add neoverse-n1 support to QEMU SBSA

by Itaru Kitayama

Hi, I'd like to boot SBSA ref board with neoverse-n1 CPU, is anyone working on this? Itaru.

3 years, 11 months

2
8
1 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 10 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 10 of 10 defect(s) ** CID 378520: (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 441 in spmc_shm_convert_shmem_obj_from_v1_0() /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 441 in spmc_shm_convert_shmem_obj_from_v1_0() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378520: (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 441 in spmc_shm_convert_shmem_obj_from_v1_0() 435 emad_array_in = mtd_orig->emad; 436 emad_array_out = (struct ffa_emad_v1_0 *) 437 ((uint8_t *) out + out->emad_offset); 438 439 /* Copy across the emad structs. */ 440 for (unsigned int i = 0U; i < out->emad_count; i++) { >>> CID 378520: (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array of 48 bytes at byte offset 48 by dereferencing pointer "&emad_array_out[i]". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.] 441 memcpy(&emad_array_out[i], &emad_array_in[i], 442 sizeof(struct ffa_emad_v1_0)); 443 } 444 445 /* Place the mrd descriptors after the end of the emad descriptors.*/ 446 mrd_in_offset = emad_array_in->comp_mrd_offset; /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 441 in spmc_shm_convert_shmem_obj_from_v1_0() 435 emad_array_in = mtd_orig->emad; 436 emad_array_out = (struct ffa_emad_v1_0 *) 437 ((uint8_t *) out + out->emad_offset); 438 439 /* Copy across the emad structs. */ 440 for (unsigned int i = 0U; i < out->emad_count; i++) { >>> CID 378520: (OVERRUN) >>> Calling "memcpy" with "&emad_array_in[i]" and "16UL" is suspicious because "emad_array_in" points into a buffer of 16 bytes and the function call may access "(char *)&emad_array_in[i] + 15UL". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.] 441 memcpy(&emad_array_out[i], &emad_array_in[i], 442 sizeof(struct ffa_emad_v1_0)); 443 } 444 445 /* Place the mrd descriptors after the end of the emad descriptors.*/ 446 mrd_in_offset = emad_array_in->comp_mrd_offset; ** CID 378519: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 525 in spmc_shm_convert_mtd_to_v1_0() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378519: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 525 in spmc_shm_convert_mtd_to_v1_0() 519 ((uint8_t *) mtd_orig + mtd_orig->emad_offset); 520 emad_array_out = out->emad; 521 522 /* Copy across the emad structs. */ 523 emad_in = emad_array_in; 524 for (unsigned int i = 0U; i < out->emad_count; i++) { >>> CID 378519: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Calling "memcpy" with "&emad_array_out[i]" and "16UL" is suspicious because "emad_array_out" points into a buffer of 16 bytes and the function call may access "(char *)&emad_array_out[i] + 15UL". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.] 525 memcpy(&emad_array_out[i], emad_in, 526 sizeof(struct ffa_emad_v1_0)); 527 528 emad_in += mtd_orig->emad_size; 529 } 530 ** CID 378518: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1689 in spmc_ffa_mem_relinquish() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378518: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1689 in spmc_ffa_mem_relinquish() 1683 if (req->endpoint_count == 0) { 1684 WARN("%s: endpoint count cannot be 0.\n", __func__); 1685 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1686 goto err_unlock_mailbox; 1687 } 1688 >>> CID 378518: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) >>> Calling "spin_lock" acquires lock "spmc_shmem_obj_state.lock" while holding lock "mailbox.lock" (count: 2 / 5). 1689 spin_lock(&spmc_shmem_obj_state.lock); 1690 1691 obj = spmc_shmem_obj_lookup(&spmc_shmem_obj_state, req->handle); 1692 if (obj == NULL) { 1693 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1694 goto err_unlock_all; ** CID 378517: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1338 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378517: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1338 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1332 WARN("%s: invalid length %u < %zu\n", __func__, total_length, 1333 min_desc_size); 1334 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1335 goto err_unlock_mailbox; 1336 } 1337 >>> CID 378517: Program hangs (ORDER_REVERSAL) >>> Calling "spin_lock" acquires lock "spmc_shmem_obj_state.lock" while holding lock "mailbox.lock" (count: 2 / 5). 1338 spin_lock(&spmc_shmem_obj_state.lock); 1339 1340 obj = spmc_shmem_obj_lookup(&spmc_shmem_obj_state, req->handle); 1341 if (obj == NULL) { 1342 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1343 goto err_unlock_all; ** CID 378516: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1005 in spmc_ffa_fill_desc() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378516: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1005 in spmc_ffa_fill_desc() 999 } 1000 1001 /* Get a new obj to store the v1.1 descriptor. */ 1002 v1_1_obj = 1003 spmc_shmem_obj_alloc(&spmc_shmem_obj_state, v1_1_desc_size); 1004 >>> CID 378516: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) >>> Null-checking "obj" suggests that it may be null, but it has already been dereferenced on all paths leading to the check. 1005 if (!obj) { 1006 ret = FFA_ERROR_NO_MEMORY; 1007 goto err_arg; 1008 } 1009 1010 /* Perform the conversion from v1.0 to v1.1. */ ** CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1446 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1407 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1483 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1477 1478 /* 1479 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1480 * directly. 1481 */ 1482 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->emad_count" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as a loop boundary. 1483 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(resp, obj, buf_size, 0, 1484 &copy_size, 1485 &out_desc_size); 1486 if (ret != 0U) { 1487 ERROR("%s: Failed to process descriptor.\n", __func__); 1488 goto err_unlock_all; /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1483 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1477 1478 /* 1479 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1480 * directly. 1481 */ 1482 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->address_range_count" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1483 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(resp, obj, buf_size, 0, 1484 &copy_size, 1485 &out_desc_size); 1486 if (ret != 0U) { 1487 ERROR("%s: Failed to process descriptor.\n", __func__); 1488 goto err_unlock_all; /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1483 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1477 1478 /* 1479 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1480 * directly. 1481 */ 1482 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->desc" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1483 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(resp, obj, buf_size, 0, 1484 &copy_size, 1485 &out_desc_size); 1486 if (ret != 0U) { 1487 ERROR("%s: Failed to process descriptor.\n", __func__); 1488 goto err_unlock_all; /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1483 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1477 1478 /* 1479 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1480 * directly. 1481 */ 1482 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->emad_size" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1483 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(resp, obj, buf_size, 0, 1484 &copy_size, 1485 &out_desc_size); 1486 if (ret != 0U) { 1487 ERROR("%s: Failed to process descriptor.\n", __func__); 1488 goto err_unlock_all; /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1446 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1440 &emad_size); 1441 if (emad == NULL) { 1442 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1443 goto err_unlock_all; 1444 } 1445 >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Using tainted variable "obj->desc.emad_count" as a loop boundary. 1446 for (size_t j = 0; j < obj->desc.emad_count; j++) { 1447 other_emad = spmc_shmem_obj_get_emad( 1448 &obj->desc, j, MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 1), 1449 &emad_size); 1450 1451 if (other_emad == NULL) { /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1407 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1401 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1402 goto err_unlock_all; 1403 } 1404 } 1405 1406 /* Validate that the provided emad offset and structure is valid.*/ >>> CID 378515: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Using tainted variable "req->emad_count" as a loop boundary. 1407 for (size_t i = 0; i < req->emad_count; i++) { 1408 size_t emad_size; 1409 struct ffa_emad_v1_0 *emad; 1410 1411 emad = spmc_shmem_obj_get_emad(req, i, ffa_version, 1412 &emad_size); ** CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1604 in spmc_ffa_mem_frag_rx() 1598 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1599 * directly. 1600 */ 1601 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { 1602 size_t out_desc_size; 1603 >>> CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->emad_count" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as a loop boundary. 1604 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(mbox->rx_buffer, obj, 1605 buf_size, 1606 fragment_offset, 1607 &copy_size, 1608 &out_desc_size); 1609 if (ret != 0U) { /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1604 in spmc_ffa_mem_frag_rx() 1598 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1599 * directly. 1600 */ 1601 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { 1602 size_t out_desc_size; 1603 >>> CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->emad_size" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1604 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(mbox->rx_buffer, obj, 1605 buf_size, 1606 fragment_offset, 1607 &copy_size, 1608 &out_desc_size); 1609 if (ret != 0U) { /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1604 in spmc_ffa_mem_frag_rx() 1598 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1599 * directly. 1600 */ 1601 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { 1602 size_t out_desc_size; 1603 >>> CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->address_range_count" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1604 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(mbox->rx_buffer, obj, 1605 buf_size, 1606 fragment_offset, 1607 &copy_size, 1608 &out_desc_size); 1609 if (ret != 0U) { /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1604 in spmc_ffa_mem_frag_rx() 1598 * If the caller is v1.0 convert the descriptor, otherwise copy 1599 * directly. 1600 */ 1601 if (ffa_version == MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 0)) { 1602 size_t out_desc_size; 1603 >>> CID 378514: (TAINTED_SCALAR) >>> Passing tainted expression "obj->desc" to "spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor", which uses it as an offset. 1604 ret = spmc_populate_ffa_v1_0_descriptor(mbox->rx_buffer, obj, 1605 buf_size, 1606 fragment_offset, 1607 &copy_size, 1608 &out_desc_size); 1609 if (ret != 0U) { ** CID 378513: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1320 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378513: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1320 in spmc_ffa_mem_retrieve_req() 1314 __func__); 1315 ret = FFA_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; 1316 goto err_unlock_mailbox; 1317 } 1318 1319 if (req->emad_count == 0U) { >>> CID 378513: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Dereferencing null pointer "obj". 1320 WARN("%s: unsupported attribute desc count %u.\n", 1321 __func__, obj->desc.emad_count); 1322 return -EINVAL; 1323 } 1324 1325 /* Determine the appropriate minimum descriptor size. */ ** CID 378512: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1714 in spmc_ffa_mem_relinquish() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378512: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 1714 in spmc_ffa_mem_relinquish() 1708 struct ffa_emad_v1_0 *emad; 1709 1710 for (unsigned int j = 0; j < obj->desc.emad_count; j++) { 1711 emad = spmc_shmem_obj_get_emad(&obj->desc, j, 1712 MAKE_FFA_VERSION(1, 1), 1713 &emad_size); >>> CID 378512: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) >>> Dereferencing "emad", which is known to be "NULL". 1714 if (req->endpoint_array[i] == 1715 emad->mapd.endpoint_id) { 1716 found = true; 1717 break; 1718 } 1719 } ** CID 378511: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 681 in spmc_shmem_check_obj() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378511: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /services/std_svc/spm/el3_spmc/spmc_shared_mem.c: 681 in spmc_shmem_check_obj() 675 } 676 677 /* 678 * Validate the calculated emad address resides within the 679 * descriptor. 680 */ >>> CID 378511: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> "(uint8_t *)&obj->desc + obj->desc_size" evaluates to an address that is at byte offset 64 of an array of 48 bytes. 681 if ((uintptr_t) emad >= 682 (uintptr_t)((uint8_t *) &obj->desc + obj->desc_size)) { 683 WARN("Invalid emad access.\n"); 684 return -EINVAL; 685 } 686 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=HRESupC-2F2Czv4BOaCWWCy7my0P…

3 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

[Question] fix(security): apply SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_3 to A73/A75/A72/A57

by JY Ho (何駿彥)

Dear Sirs, I’m TF-A developer of MediaTek and have a situation of CVE patch (https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/14298) with CA73. In CA73 platform with 64-bit TF-A v2.4 and 64-bit OP-TEE v3.16, system will occur halt during boot flow after we applied fix(security): apply SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_3 to A73/A75/A72/A57<https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/14298>. We used ICE to trace boot flow step by step, and found S-EL1 will ask EL3 its SMC_VERSION. In the fastcall, TF-A will execute wa_cve_2017_5715_bpiall_vbar()<https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/14298/11/lib…> which back up some setting and switch processor from AArch-64 to AArch-32 and does BPIALL<https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/14298/11/lib…>. But AArch32 cannot access and run over than 4G bus address without LPAE. (Suppose the TF-A and OP-TEE are locate on over than 4G bus address.) Maybe can we replace AArch32_stub with IC IALLU ? Or add LPAE setting before do AArch32_stub? (I don’t know it make sense or not) Thank you. JY

3 years, 12 months

3
3
1 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 6 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 6 of 6 defect(s) ** CID 378487: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378487: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) /plat/intel/soc/common/socfpga_sip_svc.c: 738 in sip_smc_handler_v1() 732 733 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_RSU_NOTIFY: 734 status = intel_rsu_notify(x1); 735 SMC_RET1(handle, status); 736 737 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_RSU_RETRY_COUNTER: >>> CID 378487: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) >>> Pointer "rsu_respbuf" points to an object whose effective type is "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned) but is dereferenced as a narrower "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned). This may lead to unexpected results depending on machine endianness. 738 status = intel_rsu_retry_counter((uint32_t *)rsu_respbuf, 739 ARRAY_SIZE(rsu_respbuf), &retval); 740 if (status) { 741 SMC_RET1(handle, status); 742 } else { 743 SMC_RET2(handle, status, retval); ** CID 378486: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) /plat/intel/soc/common/sip/socfpga_sip_fcs.c: 1734 in intel_fcs_aes_crypt_update_finalize() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378486: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) /plat/intel/soc/common/sip/socfpga_sip_fcs.c: 1734 in intel_fcs_aes_crypt_update_finalize() 1728 1729 if (is_finalised != 0U) { 1730 memset((void *)&fcs_aes_init_payload, 0, 1731 sizeof(fcs_aes_init_payload)); 1732 } 1733 >>> CID 378486: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) >>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "status < 0U". 1734 if (status < 0U) { 1735 return INTEL_SIP_SMC_STATUS_ERROR; 1736 } 1737 1738 return INTEL_SIP_SMC_STATUS_OK; ** CID 378485: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /lib/psa/measured_boot.c: 26 in print_byte_array() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378485: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /lib/psa/measured_boot.c: 26 in print_byte_array() 20 21 if (array == NULL || len == 0U) { 22 (void)printf("\n"); 23 } 24 25 for (i = 0U; i < len; ++i) { >>> CID 378485: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Dereferencing null pointer "array". 26 (void)printf(" %02x", array[i]); 27 if ((i & U(0xF)) == U(0xF)) { 28 (void)printf("\n"); 29 if (i < (len - 1U)) { 30 INFO("\t\t:"); 31 } ** CID 378484: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /plat/intel/soc/common/soc/socfpga_mailbox.c: 244 in mailbox_read_response_async() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378484: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /plat/intel/soc/common/soc/socfpga_mailbox.c: 244 in mailbox_read_response_async() 238 ret_resp_len = MBOX_RESP_LEN(mailbox_resp_ctr.payload->header); 239 if ((ret_resp_len > 0) && (response == NULL) && resp_len) { 240 if (*resp_len > ret_resp_len) { 241 *resp_len = ret_resp_len; 242 } 243 >>> CID 378484: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Passing null pointer "response" to "memcpy", which dereferences it. [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.] 244 memcpy((uint8_t *) response, 245 (uint8_t *) mailbox_resp_ctr.payload->data, 246 *resp_len * MBOX_WORD_BYTE); 247 } 248 249 /* reset async response param */ ** CID 378483: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378483: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) /plat/intel/soc/common/socfpga_sip_svc.c: 881 in sip_smc_handler_v1() 875 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_ATTESTATION_MEASUREMENTS: 876 status = intel_fcs_get_measurement(x1, x2, x3, 877 (uint32_t *) &x4, &mbox_error); 878 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, x3, x4); 879 880 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_GET_ATTESTATION_CERT: >>> CID 378483: Integer handling issues (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) >>> Pointer "&x3" points to an object whose effective type is "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned) but is dereferenced as a narrower "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned). This may lead to unexpected results depending on machine endianness. 881 status = intel_fcs_get_attestation_cert(x1, x2, 882 (uint32_t *) &x3, &mbox_error); 883 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, x2, x3); 884 885 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_CREATE_CERT_ON_RELOAD: 886 status = intel_fcs_create_cert_on_reload(x1, &mbox_error); ** CID 378482: (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 378482: (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) /plat/intel/soc/common/socfpga_sip_svc.c: 871 in sip_smc_handler_v1() 865 866 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_CHIP_ID: 867 status = intel_fcs_chip_id(&retval, &retval2, &mbox_error); 868 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, retval, retval2); 869 870 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_ATTESTATION_SUBKEY: >>> CID 378482: (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) >>> Pointer "&x4" points to an object whose effective type is "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned) but is dereferenced as a narrower "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned). This may lead to unexpected results depending on machine endianness. 871 status = intel_fcs_attestation_subkey(x1, x2, x3, 872 (uint32_t *) &x4, &mbox_error); 873 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, x3, x4); 874 875 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_ATTESTATION_MEASUREMENTS: 876 status = intel_fcs_get_measurement(x1, x2, x3, /plat/intel/soc/common/socfpga_sip_svc.c: 876 in sip_smc_handler_v1() 870 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_ATTESTATION_SUBKEY: 871 status = intel_fcs_attestation_subkey(x1, x2, x3, 872 (uint32_t *) &x4, &mbox_error); 873 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, x3, x4); 874 875 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_ATTESTATION_MEASUREMENTS: >>> CID 378482: (INCOMPATIBLE_CAST) >>> Pointer "&x4" points to an object whose effective type is "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned) but is dereferenced as a narrower "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned). This may lead to unexpected results depending on machine endianness. 876 status = intel_fcs_get_measurement(x1, x2, x3, 877 (uint32_t *) &x4, &mbox_error); 878 SMC_RET4(handle, status, mbox_error, x3, x4); 879 880 case INTEL_SIP_SMC_FCS_GET_ATTESTATION_CERT: 881 status = intel_fcs_get_attestation_cert(x1, x2, ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=HRESupC-2F2Czv4BOaCWWCy7my0P…

3 years, 12 months

1
0
0 0

imx8mn and HAB

by Heiko Thiery

Hi, We use mainline TF-A and have problems using the HAB API in the U-Boot. We see for example that the hab_auth_img command fails in the mainline U-Boot. If we switch to the downstream NXP TF-A it works. Is this to be expected? -- Heiko

3 years, 12 months

3
5
0 0

Issue about passing arguments between the BL1 and BL2 in Arch32

by 邬金平

Hi Arguments between the BL1 and BL2 is overlap by zeromem when BL2 start. 1. BL2 save r3 to r12 arm-trusted-firmware/bl2/aarch32/bl2_entrypoint.S /*--------------------------------------------- * Save arguments x0 - x3 from BL1 for future * use. * --------------------------------------------- */ mov r9, r0 mov r10, r1 mov r11, r2 mov r12, r3 2. BL2 call zeromem to clear bss arm-trusted-firmware/bl2/aarch32/bl2_entrypoint.S ldr r0, =__BSS_START__ ldr r1, =__BSS_END__ sub r1, r1, r0 bl zeromem arm-trusted-firmware/lib/aarch32/misc_helpers.S tmp .req r12 /* Temporary scratch register */ r12 used as scratch register 3. r3 restore from r12 arm-trusted-firmware/bl2/aarch32/bl2_entrypoint.S mov r0, r9 mov r1, r10 mov r2, r11 mov r3, r12 I can try to save it in other registers, but can not guarantee that the register will not be damaged. Is there any better way to deal with this problem? Thanks.

3 years, 12 months

2
1
0 0

ECLAIR for static analysis

by Varun Wadekar

Hi @Joanna<mailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com>, I am glad that tf.org has taken this step to improve code quality with the latest announcement [1]. Some questions to understand the model a bit better. 1. Is the tool available to the community? 2. Can people run this before submission? Or is it restricted to a certain group? 3. Will full reports be released to the community? 4. What will the deployment model look like? I suggest we discuss this in a tech forum to reach the entire community. -Varun [1] https://www.trustedfirmware.org/news/BugSeng_press_release/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trust…> https://www.bugseng.com/eclair<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bugse…> https://www.bugseng.com/sites/default/files/resources/ECLAIR_TUV-SUD_Certif…<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bugse…>

4 years

2
1
0 0

About SVE issue

by Ming Huang

Hi, We use TF-A v2.5 with ENABLE_SVE_FOR_NS=1 and SPM_MM=1 and boot linux kernel is ok. Atfer upgrade TF-A with patch fix(spm_mm): do not compile if SVE/SME is enabled (4333f95bedb), we set ENABLE_SVE_FOR_NS=0 to fix compile error, but we get exception and hang in EL3 when boot kernel: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.10.23-003debug.ali5000.alios7.aarch64 (root(a)j66e01291.sqa.eu95) (gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20200825 (Alibaba 10.2.1-3 2.17) ...... [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [1] 80 [1] 81 [1] 82 [1] 83 [1] 84 [1] 85 [1] 86 [1] 87 [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [1] 88 [1] 89 [1] 90 [1] 91 [1] 92 [1] 93 [1] 94 [1] 95 ERROR: Excepton received on 0x81000000, spsr_el3:89,reason:1 esr_el3:0x66000000 Exception Class = 19: Access to SVE functionality trapped as a result of CPACR_EL1.ZEN,CPTR_EL2.ZEN, CPTR_EL2.TZ, or CPTR_EL3.EZ. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How to fix the exception issue? Can we remove the below lines? ifeq (${ENABLE_SVE_FOR_NS},1) $(error "Error: SPM_MM is not compatible with ENABLE_SVE_FOR_NS") endif Regards, Ming Huang

4 years

2
2
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A