*Attendees*: Shebu, Peterson, Xinyu, Paul, Black, Ben C, Matteo, Glen, Andon, Don, Joanna
- Discussing compiler issues used in Open CI compiler latencies that have been seen - Paul driving a new licensing model. Also want to try new licensing. See performance issues on Arm CI as well. - Matteo: Use CPU and Arch models. Have problems w/ model licenses - Ben to provide licenses in license file. - Running these for TF-M and TF-A. - Paul would like to determine how much improvement he can gain. Want to know how long should take - Ben: TFC-110 request for long term licenses. https://projects.linaro.org/browse/TFC-110 - Glen to give Paul full access to tickets. Add Peterson Quadros as well
- Anton: Approaching release. No issues, but LAVA had an issue. - Xinju: See https://tf.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/alljobs?length=25&search=2956... Lava jobs cancelled themselves. - Ben: Assumed someone did this. No way to tell who did this. - Glen: Should we send out an email? - Ben already told his team. - Xinyu, another release build tomorrow. - Anton: Expect lots of TF-M usage over next 2 weeks. Expect this is one time event, so no ticket - Joanna: Team is struggling w/ some use cases. TFC-87. How jobs reported in gerrit. - Joanna: 2nd issue - jobs taking longer to run. Running CI on patches may take 3-4 hours. May have been tied to simultaneous TF-M builds? Not sure. Team seeing some stability issues. Forcing multiple runs. Not sure if servers, tests, or other. How should this be approached - MC: Does TFC-87 require Open CI dev teams? - JF: Can do some minor things, but not sure that's the best patch - MC: Have agreed on a set of desired features in the in-progress column. Want to keep the focus on these. Unless it's a blocker, then would like to see this remain backlogged - JF: Can try to drive from Arm, but may need Leonardo support for quick questions, etc. Usability - MC: We agreed to focus on more coverage focus vs better usability. - JF: Can an infrastructure boost help? Assume it won't get better. - GV: Maintenance piece feels missing in some ways. ST board seeing regressions, for example. Need to determine who is watching these failures. - GV: Why failures are occurring is the missing piece - SK: ST a new board, not sure it falls under maintenance. - GV: High level - who is supposed to be watching the boards - SK: A roles and responsibility needs to be developed. - MC: This year, features, next year, transition to improvements. - GV: Code coverage should wrap up in the next week. Expect scripts task moving forward as well. - GV: Chromebooks progressing - health check should be running in the next few days, awaiting h/w to reach Cambridge lab. - GV: Dave, Scott, Leonardo are finalizing estimates for MBed TLS. A sync today. Estimates are within October time frame. So want to finish Expect and Code Coverage, then transition to MBed TLS start of August. TFC-114, and 110 still need closed out. - GV: Boards are looking good - Arthur may be able to pick up some jenkins related tasks if spare time. - GV: When we move to maintenance mode, want to evaluate the best fits.