Hi,
I'm trying to build for the Musca B1 with the proxy service. I understand that I have to two separate builds, one for the secure_enclave and one for the SSE-200. The secure enclave build works fine, but I'm getting errors for the SSE-200 build and my various attempts to get around them have all failed. I'm (also) wondering if there are artifacts form the secure_enclave build that need to feed into the SSE-200 build somehow, and if so how that works.
Here's my command line and resulting errors:
cmake -S . -B build_musca_sse200_GNUARM_Relwithdebinfo '-GUnix Makefiles' -DTFM_PLATFORM=arm/musca_b1/sse_200 -DTFM_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=toolchain_GNUARM.cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Relwithdebinfo -DTFM_PSA_API=ON -DFORWARD_PROT_MSG=ON
In file included from /lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/bl0/bl0_main.c:17:0:
/lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Include/cmsis.h:63:10: fatal error: core_cm33.h: No such file or directory
#include <core_cm33.h> /*!< Arm Cortex-M33 processor and core peripherals */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
/lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Source/gcc/startup_cmsdk_musca_bl2.S:20:10: fatal error: tfm_plat_config.h: No such file or directory
#include "tfm_plat_config.h"
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
In file included from /lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Include/platform_description.h:23:0,
from /lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Source/system_core_init.c:23:
/lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Include/cmsis.h:63:10: fatal error: core_cm33.h: No such file or directory
#include <core_cm33.h> /*!< Arm Cortex-M33 processor and core peripherals */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
/lhome/cbrand/work/trees_2/psoc6_atfm/trusted-firmware-m/platform/ext/target/arm/musca_b1/sse_200/Device/Source/device_definition.c:29:10: fatal error: tfm_plat_defs.h: No such file or directory
#include "tfm_plat_defs.h"
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
[...]
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "FORWARD_PROT_MSG" redefined
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
[...]
platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/build.make:86: recipe for target 'platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/bl0_main.o' failed
gmake[2]: *** [platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/bl0_main.o] Error 1
gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/build.make:138: recipe for target 'platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/system_core_init.o' failed
gmake[2]: *** [platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/system_core_init.o] Error 1
platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/build.make:125: recipe for target 'platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/device_definition.o' failed
gmake[2]: *** [platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/device_definition.o] Error 1
platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/build.make:81: recipe for target 'platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/gcc/startup_cmsdk_musca_bl2.o' failed
gmake[2]: *** [platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/__/Device/Source/gcc/startup_cmsdk_musca_bl2.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:2539: recipe for target 'platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/all' failed
gmake[1]: *** [platform/target/bl0/CMakeFiles/bl0.dir/all] Error 2
gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
This is from a clean checkout of 54d47fbd5269 (current HEAD).
I see that my tree does contain platform/ext/cmsis/core_cm33.h, platform/include/tfm_plat_config.h and platform/include/tfm_plat_defs.h so I guess it's the include paths that are messed up somehow...?
Thanks,
Chris Brand
Cypress Semiconductor (Canada), Inc.
Sr Prin Software Engr
CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1
Office: +1 778 234 0515
Chris.Brand(a)infineon.com<mailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com>
Hi,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, June 24 7:00-8:00 UTC (Asia time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Recording and slides of previous meetings are here:
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/
Best regards,
Anton
Hi Ken
> Or any doubts about depreciating it?
It is not used because its implementation is not finished, the current
implementation is only for PSA L1 and not supported by IPC. This is not
enough for certification.
The Log service is optimally required by the PSA Certification.
If you going to deprecate it, first delete the requirement from the PSA
L2&L3 Certification profiles.
Thanks,
Andrej
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Ken Liu via
TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:46 AM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: [TF-M] Deprecate 'partitions/audit_logging' and its related tests
Hi,
The component name under this folder is 'Audit logging', and:
* There is no explicit specification or requirements for it, and its
functionality is as a simple log collector (and looks no one is using it).
* It supported under the library model only. And it is meaningless to
move to IPC because of this.
* It costs extra maintenance effort in test cases and partition code.
So a plan is to deprecate this folder and its related test cases; will
create a new one when the specification or requirements are explicitly
defined.
Question here is:
Anyone is using this service? Or any doubts about depreciating it?
Will collect the response and broadcast it at 25th Jun.
Thanks.
/Ken
Hi,
The component name under this folder is 'Audit logging', and:
* There is no explicit specification or requirements for it, and its functionality is as a simple log collector (and looks no one is using it).
* It supported under the library model only. And it is meaningless to move to IPC because of this.
* It costs extra maintenance effort in test cases and partition code.
So a plan is to deprecate this folder and its related test cases; will create a new one when the specification or requirements are explicitly defined.
Question here is:
Anyone is using this service? Or any doubts about depreciating it?
Will collect the response and broadcast it at 25th Jun.
Thanks.
/Ken
This event has been changed with this note:
"Extending end date"
Title: TF-M Tech forum
About TF-M Tech forum:This is an open forum for anyone to participate and
it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate
under the guidance of the TF TSC.Feel free to forward it to
colleagues.Details of previous meetings are
here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/==…Topic:
TF-M Tech forum - Asia Time Zone FriendlyTime: Nov 12, 2020 07:00 AM
Greenwich Mean Time Every 4 weeks on Thu, until
Mar 4, 2021, 5 occurrence(s) Nov 12, 2020 07:00
AM Dec 10, 2020 07:00 AM
Jan 7, 2021 07:00 AM Feb 4, 2021 07:00
AM Mar 4, 2021 07:00 AMPlease download and
import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.Weekly:
https://linaro-org.zoom.us/meeting/tJYodOyvpz8jGNEc_1ykVap8Zg6oTLqZZSeJ/ics…
Zoom
Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/92535794925?pwd=TTl0cmo4R2hTNm8wcHo1M3ZKdjlnUT09Meeting
ID: 925 3579 4925Passcode: 414410One tap mobile+12532158782,,92535794925#
US (Tacoma)+13462487799,,92535794925# US (Houston)Dial by your
location +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) +1 301 715
8592 US (Germantown) +1 312 626 6799 US
(Chicago) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
888 788 0099 US Toll-free
877 853 5247 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 925 3579 4925Find your local number:
https://linaro-org.zoom.us/u/aesS64I7GW
When: Every 4 weeks from 12am to 1am on Thursday Mountain Standard Time -
Phoenix (changed)
Where:
https://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/92535794925?pwd=TTl0cmo4R2hTNm8wcHo1M3ZKdjlnUT…
Calendar: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Who:
* Don Harbin - creator
* tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
* anton.komlev(a)arm.com
* leonardo.sandoval(a)linaro.org
* abdelmalek.omar1(a)gmail.com
Event details:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=aDM1OHZtbG0wa2di…
Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/
You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org because you are an attendee of this event.
To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event.
Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification
settings for your entire calendar.
Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to
the organizer and be added to the guest list, or invite others regardless
of their own invitation status, or to modify your RSVP. Learn more at
https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
Hi Anton,
If it's open agenda, I would like to take this opportunity to get some inputs about the use scenarios and solutions for sharing flash controller (or even other HW resources) between S and NS. For example, the security/concurrency concerns/issues etc.
Thanks.
Regards,
David Wang
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 11:03 PM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: Re: [TF-M] Technical Forum call - June 10
Hi,
We have an open agenda for the forum tomorrow.
Let's use that time to review any ongoing items and discuss open questions.
To start:
1. What kind of project measurements would be interesting for collection and ways for benchmarking.
* Booting time
* PSA service access time
* ... anything else ?
Regards and please bring your topic,
Anton
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11:26 AM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com<mailto:nd@arm.com>>
Subject: [TF-M] Technical Forum call - June 10
Hi,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, June 10, 15:00-16:00 UTC (US time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Recording and slides of previous meetings are here:
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/
Best regards,
Anton
Hi,
We have an open agenda for the forum tomorrow.
Let's use that time to review any ongoing items and discuss open questions.
To start:
1. What kind of project measurements would be interesting for collection and ways for benchmarking.
* Booting time
* PSA service access time
* ... anything else ?
Regards and please bring your topic,
Anton
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11:26 AM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: [TF-M] Technical Forum call - June 10
Hi,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, June 10, 15:00-16:00 UTC (US time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Recording and slides of previous meetings are here:
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/
Best regards,
Anton
Hi,
We have moved all arm platforms into arm folder which will make the platform folder more clear.
One thing needs to pay attention to is that you need to change the TFM_PLATFORM when building arm platforms.
For example:
'-DTFM_PLATFORM=mps2/an521' --> '-DTFM_PLATFORM=arm/mps2/an521'.
It does not influence partner platforms build commands, only for arm platforms.
Best Regards,
Summer
Hi Poppy Wu
> the macro TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR below may be a pointer to the shared HUK
data(stored in secure RAM) from secure boot?
Yes, this is a pointer to a HUK, provisioned in a secure memory region.
Best regards,
Andrej Butok
SW Tech Lead
Edge Processing
NXP Semiconductors
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Edward Yang
via TF-M
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 12:13 PM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com>
Subject: Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Sherry,
Thanks a lot for your reply,it's a big help.
So with current tf-m crypto service implementation,if I want to use
psa_aead_encrypt() to do encryption with a persistent key which is
provisioned before the reset,I need to use psa_open_key() as a temporary
method.
Besides,the implementation of key derivation from HUK on NXP platform,I
suppose in actual development ,the macro TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR below may be a
pointer to the shared HUK data(stored in secure RAM) from secure boot?
+#ifndef TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR
+static const uint8_t sample_tfm_key[] =
+ {0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, \
+ 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F};
+
+#define TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR sample_tfm_key
+#endif
status = psa_import_key(&attributes, (const uint8_t *)TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR,
TFM_HUK_KEY_LEN, &base_key);
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mxic.c
om.cn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40nxp.com%7Ca93215d45b04467d08a008d9267
83c86%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637583120130280321%7CUnkn
own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rkCPRgsZNK6j3xKoAJkJQDjPW8nA6RDW6JosI0EbSOY%3D&reserve
d=0> http://www.mxic.com.cn
Sherry Zhang via TF-M <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
<mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> >
Sent by: "TF-M" <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
<mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org> >
2021/06/03 14:23
Please respond to
Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com <mailto:Sherry.Zhang2@arm.com> >
To
Edward Yang <EdwardYang(a)mxic.com.cn <mailto:EdwardYang@mxic.com.cn> >,
"tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> "
<tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> >
cc
nd <nd(a)arm.com <mailto:nd@arm.com> >
Subject
Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Poppy,
The updated PSA crypto spec supports calling psa_aead_encrypt to do
encryption with a persistent key which is provisioned before the reset. But
currently, the TF-M crypto service has not been updated to the updated PSA
crypto spec version in which the psa_open_key is removed. Currently, in TFM,
the persistent key should be opened by calling psa_open_key before using
this key to do crypto operations which follows the older version of spec.
The tfm_crypto_check_handle_owner() API is used for the isolation between
the clients. When aligning to the new PSA crypto spec, the isolation
implementation should be updated accordingly.
Regards,
Sherry Zhang
From: Edward Yang <EdwardYang(a)mxic.com.cn <mailto:EdwardYang@mxic.com.cn> >
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 11:03 AM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> ;
Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com <mailto:Sherry.Zhang2@arm.com> >
Subject: Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Sherry,
Import persistent key with a specified key_id is indeed supported in the
updated crypto spec..
I mean,if a key created by derivation functions,and this key is imported as
a persistent key with s specific key id such as KEY_ID_EXAMPLE,then this key
is stored in internal Flash with its service.
After the reset,this persistent key still exists,but this persisten key
cannot be used to do encryption directly,for example,call
psa_aead_encrypt(KEY_ID_EXAMPLE,alg,nonce,...),unless import this key with
psa_import() once again.
Call psa_aead_encrypt(SSKEY_ID,alg,nonce,...) without calling
psa_import_key() in advance is not allowed,because in
tfm_crypto_check_handle_owner()(why this API is needed?)it will check this
key_id with handle_owner[] array.
So I am wondering what's the intended use of persistent keys? After
creation, this persistent keys can only be used to derive other encryption
keys,rather than used to encrypt data with themselves?
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mxic.c
om.cn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40nxp.com%7Ca93215d45b04467d08a008d9267
83c86%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637583120130285299%7CUnkn
own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=zQkONnZCSzkuPTyBfrf9yGAxpYw4iT1J7GImry15nNs%3D&reserve
d=0> http://www.mxic.com.cn
Sherry Zhang via TF-M < <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent by: "TF-M" < <mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
2021/06/02 17:37
Please respond to
Sherry Zhang < <mailto:Sherry.Zhang2@arm.com> Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com>
To
" <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org" <
<mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
cc
nd < <mailto:nd@arm.com> nd(a)arm.com>
Subject
Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Poppy,
Some feedback from my understanding on the first question.
1. Import persistent key with a key_id is still supported in the
updated PSA crypto spec.
In the version of PSA crypto spec in which psa_open_key is supported, the
persistent key can be opened after the reset with the key_id which is
specified in the key attributes in key creation. This is not very friendly.
The reason is that each time the user calls the psa_open_key, the crypto
service loads the key material from slot to running area(ram or flash) thus
a new associated resources is allocated. The application must eventually
call psa_close_key to release the allocated associated resources. It can
happen that multiple applications call psa_open_key multile times as they
may do not know whether the key is opened by other applications. So it can
happen that multiple copies of associated resources are allocated for the
same key. This is not user friendly.
In the updated PSA crypto spec, the key material management strategy is
changed. The user does not need to call the psa_open_key to load the key
from slot to ram/flash. See the section of "9.4 Key identifies" of the spec:
```
Key identifiers are output from a successful call to one of the key creation
functions. For persistent keys,
this is the same identifier as the one specified in the key attributes used
to create the key. The key
indenter remains valid until it is invalidated by passing it to
psa_destroy_key(). A volatile key identifier
must not be used after it has been invalidated.
```
So I think the user can use the key_id directly to call crypto
operations, such as means encrypt, decrypt.
Regards,
Sherry Zhang
From: TF-M < <mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Edward Yang via TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:30 PM
To: <mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Experts,
I have some questions about crypto persisten keys.
1. psa_open_key() is removed in psa crypto spec,so it is impossible to
import a persistent key into key slot with key_id,which means
encrypt/decrypt data directly with a persistent key is not allowed,these
persistent keys can only be
used to derive volatile keys which will be used for encryption/decryption, I
am not sure if I understand correctly.
2. Besides,HUK can be used to derive the other crypto keys,such as ps crypto
key.HUK may be stored in OTP area of MCU(without crypto element such as
cc312),then what's intended flow to derive crypto keys from HUK via calling
PSA crypto service?There is no reference implementation in tf-m code.
tfm_plat_get_huk_derived_key(){
get HUK from OTP
||
||
\/
how to derive crypto key from HUK with calling crypto service?
}
3. BTW,HUK has a persistent key id TFM_CRYPTO_KEY_ID_HUK defined in
tfm_crypto_defs.h,but I haven't seen any reference to this macro. What's the
intended use of this key id?And what's the key owner of HUK?
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mxic.c
om.cn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40nxp.com%7Ca93215d45b04467d08a008d9267
83c86%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637583120130290277%7CUnkn
own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Qq7wg%2BW9xen65%2BTArZ2w33nPvaB9iHjOOKNcwkyyXu0%3D&res
erved=0> http://www.mxic.com.cn
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or
personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded
that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or
its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well
as it attachments from your system. In addition, please be informed that
collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless
expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your
attention and cooperation.
Macronix International Co., Ltd.
=====================================================================--
TF-M mailing list
<mailto:TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org> TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.tru
stedfirmware.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftf-m&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40n
xp.com%7Ca93215d45b04467d08a008d926783c86%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
%7C0%7C0%7C637583120130295255%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC
JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=eGRG%2B6%2FzEx1FqR
KyA2jtUfD6sSXEPYeC5Uo%2F8rtDjaQ%3D&reserved=0>
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m--
TF-M mailing list
TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <mailto:TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.tru
stedfirmware.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftf-m&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40n
xp.com%7Ca93215d45b04467d08a008d926783c86%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
%7C0%7C0%7C637583120130300233%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC
JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dLJ8SzvGNpE%2FKodd
C%2FNFToPCiOiS2w3ir%2FlaiZ4q6ug%3D&reserved=0>
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
Hi Sherry,
Thanks a lot for your reply,it's a big help.
So with current tf-m crypto service implementation,if I want to use
psa_aead_encrypt() to do encryption with a persistent key which is
provisioned before the reset,I need to use psa_open_key() as a temporary
method.
Besides,the implementation of key derivation from HUK on NXP platform,I
suppose in actual development ,the macro TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR below may be a
pointer to the shared HUK data(stored in secure RAM) from secure boot?
+#ifndef TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR
+static const uint8_t sample_tfm_key[] =
+ {0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, \
+ 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F};
+
+#define TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR sample_tfm_key
+#endif
status = psa_import_key(&attributes, (const uint8_t *)TFM_HUK_KEY_ADDR,
TFM_HUK_KEY_LEN, &base_key);
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
http://www.mxic.com.cn
Sherry Zhang via TF-M <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent by: "TF-M" <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
2021/06/03 14:23
Please respond to
Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com>
To
Edward Yang <EdwardYang(a)mxic.com.cn>, "tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org"
<tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
cc
nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject
Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Poppy,
The updated PSA crypto spec supports calling psa_aead_encrypt to do
encryption with a persistent key which is provisioned before the reset.
But currently, the TF-M crypto service has not been updated to the updated
PSA crypto spec version in which the psa_open_key is removed. Currently,
in TFM, the persistent key should be opened by calling psa_open_key before
using this key to do crypto operations which follows the older version of
spec. The tfm_crypto_check_handle_owner() API is used for the isolation
between the clients. When aligning to the new PSA crypto spec, the
isolation implementation should be updated accordingly.
Regards,
Sherry Zhang
From: Edward Yang <EdwardYang(a)mxic.com.cn>
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 11:03 AM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com>
Subject: Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Sherry,
Import persistent key with a specified key_id is indeed supported in the
updated crypto spec..
I mean,if a key created by derivation functions,and this key is imported
as a persistent key with s specific key id such as KEY_ID_EXAMPLE,then
this key is stored in internal Flash with its service.
After the reset,this persistent key still exists,but this persisten key
cannot be used to do encryption directly,for example,call
psa_aead_encrypt(KEY_ID_EXAMPLE,alg,nonce,...),unless import this key with
psa_import() once again.
Call psa_aead_encrypt(SSKEY_ID,alg,nonce,...) without calling
psa_import_key() in advance is not allowed,because in
tfm_crypto_check_handle_owner()(why this API is needed?)it will check this
key_id with handle_owner[] array.
So I am wondering what's the intended use of persistent keys? After
creation, this persistent keys can only be used to derive other encryption
keys,rather than used to encrypt data with themselves?
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
http://www.mxic.com.cn
Sherry Zhang via TF-M <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent by: "TF-M" <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
2021/06/02 17:37
Please respond to
Sherry Zhang <Sherry.Zhang2(a)arm.com>
To
"tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org" <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
cc
nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject
Re: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Poppy,
Some feedback from my understanding on the first question.
1. Import persistent key with a key_id is still supported in the
updated PSA crypto spec.
In the version of PSA crypto spec in which psa_open_key is supported, the
persistent key can be opened after the reset with the key_id which is
specified in the key attributes in key creation. This is not very
friendly. The reason is that each time the user calls the psa_open_key,
the crypto service loads the key material from slot to running area(ram or
flash) thus a new associated resources is allocated. The application must
eventually call psa_close_key to release the allocated associated
resources. It can happen that multiple applications call psa_open_key
multile times as they may do not know whether the key is opened by other
applications. So it can happen that multiple copies of associated
resources are allocated for the same key. This is not user friendly.
In the updated PSA crypto spec, the key material management strategy is
changed. The user does not need to call the psa_open_key to load the key
from slot to ram/flash. See the section of “9.4 Key identifies” of the
spec:
```
Key identifiers are output from a successful call to one of the key
creation functions. For persistent keys,
this is the same identifier as the one specified in the key attributes
used to create the key. The key
indenter remains valid until it is invalidated by passing it to
psa_destroy_key(). A volatile key identifier
must not be used after it has been invalidated.
```
So I think the user can use the key_id directly to call
crypto operations, such as means encrypt, decrypt.
Regards,
Sherry Zhang
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Edward
Yang via TF-M
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:30 PM
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: [TF-M] Questions about psa crypto persistent key
Hi Experts,
I have some questions about crypto persisten keys.
1. psa_open_key() is removed in psa crypto spec,so it is impossible to
import a persistent key into key slot with key_id,which means
encrypt/decrypt data directly with a persistent key is not allowed,these
persistent keys can only be
used to derive volatile keys which will be used for encryption/decryption,
I am not sure if I understand correctly.
2. Besides,HUK can be used to derive the other crypto keys,such as ps
crypto key.HUK may be stored in OTP area of MCU(without crypto element
such as cc312),then what's intended flow to derive crypto keys from HUK
via calling PSA crypto service?There is no reference implementation in
tf-m code.
tfm_plat_get_huk_derived_key(){
get HUK from OTP
||
||
\/
how to derive crypto key from HUK with calling crypto service?
}
3. BTW,HUK has a persistent key id TFM_CRYPTO_KEY_ID_HUK defined in
tfm_crypto_defs.h,but I haven't seen any reference to this macro. What's
the intended use of this key id?And what's the key owner of HUK?
Best Regards,
Poppy Wu
Macronix Microelectronics (Suzhou) Co.,Ltd
http://www.mxic.com.cn
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information
and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be
reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail
(and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as
well as it attachments from your system. In addition, please be informed
that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited
unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for
your attention and cooperation.
Macronix International Co., Ltd.
=====================================================================--
TF-M mailing list
TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m--
TF-M mailing list
TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
============================================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well as it attachments from your system. In addition, please be informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your attention and cooperation.
Macronix International Co., Ltd.
=====================================================================
