- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

by Ambroise Vincent

Hi, A reminder that the legacy console API is going to be removed. The date is currently set to the end of June. An issue was raised here: https://github.com/ARM-software/tf-issues/issues/692 as an early warning, and listing the affected platforms. The patch can be found here: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/842/ Please let us know if you have any issues porting the change to your platform. Regards

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [TF-A] [LPC] Bootloader miniconf

by Matteo Carlini

Hi Marek, Thanks for raising the topic across the communities. The question is probably how many people from the various projects are going to attend Plumbers this year in Lisbon, so to create some critical mass. The TF.org project is planning a significant presence at the Open Source Firmware Conference happening the week before in California (https://osfc.io/), sponsoring the event and submitting few engineering topics. This is another great opportunity to meet and chat on Boot/Firmware topics as well. Having a boot miniconf the week after in Europe may be a natural extension, but I'm wondering if people would be willing to travel and attend two similar events in a row... Thanks, Matteo [Arm & TrustedFirmware.org] > -----Original Message----- > From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Marek > Vasut via TF-A > Sent: 29 April 2019 14:39 > To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut(a)gmail.com> > Cc: u-boot-custodians(a)lists.denx.de; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; > coreboot(a)coreboot.org > Subject: [TF-A] [LPC] Bootloader miniconf > > Hi, > > I was pondering whether it would make sense to organize a bootloader > miniconf at Linux Plumbers [1]. The Linux kernel is what we often start, the > bootloader projects generally do similar things, hence I think being able to > meet face-to-face and discuss how to make things better/nicer would be > beneficial. > > Feel free to expand the CC list to other interested parties. > > Thoughts ? > > [1] https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/ > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > -- > TF-A mailing list > TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org > https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a

5 years, 4 months

2
1
0 0

[LPC] Bootloader miniconf

by Marek Vasut

Hi, I was pondering whether it would make sense to organize a bootloader miniconf at Linux Plumbers [1]. The Linux kernel is what we often start, the bootloader projects generally do similar things, hence I think being able to meet face-to-face and discuss how to make things better/nicer would be beneficial. Feel free to expand the CC list to other interested parties. Thoughts ? [1] https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/ -- Best regards, Marek Vasut

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Mbed TLS: Remove weak heap implementation

by Ambroise Vincent

The shared Mbed TLS heap feature has a default implementation (weak function) that will soon be removed: plat_get_mbedtls_heap(). This is part of the general effort to avoid using weak functions in generic code. As a result, the implementation of this function becomes mandatory when supporting Trusted Board Boot. The corresponding patch can be found here: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/841 The fact that the implementation of plat_get_mbedtls_heap() becomes mandatory will break compatibility with platforms not implementing a strong version of the function. Upstream platforms are taken care of in the above patch. Downstream platforms will break, but it is easy to fix. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [TF-A] [RFC 0/2] psci: Add core wakeup operation

by Soby Mathew

Hi Abel, Thanks for the RFC. On the face of it, this is a new PSCI command that would need further discussion involving Architecture and Kernel teams. Just to summarize my understanding: Currently any interrupt targeted to a suspended core can wake it up, but it seems that this mechanism is broken on i.MX8MQ and hence you need an explicit command to wake it. This assumes that one CPU is always ON within the system ready to poke the suspended CPU back to life. This assumption is not true always as it is legal for all the CPUs to be in suspend state at the same time. Adding the kernel team for their input. JFYI, We do not intend to review patches via the mailing list and patches should be pushed as mentioned here: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/contributi… Currently the project is in github but we expect to migrate to trustedfirmware.org in April. Best Regards Soby Mathew > -----Original Message----- > From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Abel Vesa > via TF-A > Sent: 27 March 2019 12:16 > To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org > Subject: [TF-A] [RFC 0/2] psci: Add core wakeup operation > > This is more like a workaround for platforms like i.MX8MQ that have an issue > related to the wake_request GIC signal integration. > > See E11171 here: > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX8MDQLQ_0N14W.pdf > > The workaround mentioned in the document has the dissadvantage of waking > up all the sleeping cores instead of just one. > > This patchset adds another psci op for core 'poking' (waking up). > On i.MX8MQ, the plat specific implementation writes the corresponding bits in > GPC to wake up independently each core. > > Abel Vesa (2): > psci: Add cpu wake operation > plat: imx8mq: Trigger SW power up per core > > include/lib/psci/psci.h | 3 +++ > lib/psci/psci_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > lib/psci/psci_setup.c | 2 ++ > plat/imx/imx8m/imx8mq/gpc.c | 7 +++++++ > plat/imx/imx8m/imx8mq/imx8mq_psci.c | 8 ++++++++ > plat/imx/imx8m/include/gpc.h | 2 ++ > 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+) > > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > TF-A mailing list > TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org > https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a

5 years, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[RFC 0/2] psci: Add core wakeup operation

by Abel Vesa

This is more like a workaround for platforms like i.MX8MQ that have an issue related to the wake_request GIC signal integration. See E11171 here: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX8MDQLQ_0N14W.pdf The workaround mentioned in the document has the dissadvantage of waking up all the sleeping cores instead of just one. This patchset adds another psci op for core 'poking' (waking up). On i.MX8MQ, the plat specific implementation writes the corresponding bits in GPC to wake up independently each core. Abel Vesa (2): psci: Add cpu wake operation plat: imx8mq: Trigger SW power up per core include/lib/psci/psci.h | 3 +++ lib/psci/psci_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ lib/psci/psci_setup.c | 2 ++ plat/imx/imx8m/imx8mq/gpc.c | 7 +++++++ plat/imx/imx8m/imx8mq/imx8mq_psci.c | 8 ++++++++ plat/imx/imx8m/include/gpc.h | 2 ++ 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4

5 years, 5 months

1
2
0 0

Re: [Tf-a] Test email

by Joanna Farley

Test reply. On 06/02/2019, 12:55, "TF-A on behalf of John Tsichritzis via TF-A" <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org on behalf of tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote: Dear all, This is a test email. Please ignore it and sorry for the inconvenience. Kind regards, John -- [cid:part1.F2AC7E65.FED3DCD0@arm.com] <https://www.arm.com/> John Tsichritzis | Graduate Software Engineer Email : john.tsichritzis(a)arm.com<mailto:john.tsichritzis@arm.com> 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NJ, United Kingdom -- TF-A mailing list TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

Test email

by John Tsichritzis

Dear all, This is a test email. Please ignore it and sorry for the inconvenience. Kind regards, John -- [cid:part1.F2AC7E65.FED3DCD0@arm.com] <https://www.arm.com/> John Tsichritzis | Graduate Software Engineer Email : john.tsichritzis(a)arm.com<mailto:john.tsichritzis@arm.com> 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NJ, United Kingdom

5 years, 7 months

1
1
0 0

Re: [Tf-a] New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild

by Soby Mathew

> Has CMAKE been considered ? CMAKE should work equally well on > windows(visual studio and Cygwin) and linux. You can create a new build > system around CMAKE while keeping the current Makefile system alive, and > deprecate it later, once the CMAKE based build system is stable. > > -Raghu Thanks for the suggestion. Does CMAKE support configuration system as well ? Another factor to consider is the familiarity of the build system with the community, and we think Kbuild would rank high on that. Best Regards Soby Mathew IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

5 years, 8 months

2
2
0 0

Re: [Tf-a] New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild

by Raghupathy Krishnamurthy

Has CMAKE been considered ? CMAKE should work equally well on windows(visual studio and Cygwin) and linux. You can create a new build system around CMAKE while keeping the current Makefile system alive, and deprecate it later, once the CMAKE based build system is stable. -Raghu On Dec 13, 2018, at 04:00 AM, tf-a-request(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org wrote: Send TF-A mailing list submissions to tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tf-a-request(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org You can reach the person managing the list at tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of TF-A digest..." Today's Topics: 1. New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild (Antonio Nino Diaz) 2. Re: New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild (Antonio Nino Diaz) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:50:15 +0000 From: Antonio Nino Diaz <Antonio.NinoDiaz(a)arm.com> To: "tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org" <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: [Tf-a] New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild Message-ID: <DB6PR0801MB1943C8DAE7D0574D1C6E15BD89A70(a)DB6PR0801MB1943.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hello, One of the biggest issues that the current codebase of TF-A has is the build system. It is unfit for the amount of options and dependencies of said options, and adding new features is now an effort of trying to add the new feature while not breaking the rest of the code. There is another problem. When the firmware is compiled with, say, OPTION=1, if it is recompiled with OPTION=0 without cleaning first, nothing will be rebuilt. We have had several discussions about this internally and we have decided to migrate to Kbuild/Kconfig, the build system used by the Linux kernel. There are already some projects using it, like U-Boot or Zephyr RTOS. We are starting the work related to this migration, and our intention is to migrate upstream platforms to this new build system. However, this change means that: - All non-upstream platforms will break until they update their makefiles. - Compilation under Windows won't be possible anymore without Cygwin or MinGW. We're open to comments. Regards, Antonio IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:54:30 +0000 From: Antonio Nino Diaz <Antonio.NinoDiaz(a)arm.com> To: Antonio Nino Diaz <Antonio.NinoDiaz(a)arm.com>, "tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org" <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com> Subject: Re: [Tf-a] New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild Message-ID: <DB6PR0801MB1943F0BC699C1B37A8787C2889A70(a)DB6PR0801MB1943.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Please, ignore the confidentiality notice. ________________________________ From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of Antonio Nino Diaz via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: 12 December 2018 15:50:24 To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [Tf-a] New build system based on Kconfig/Kbuild Hello, One of the biggest issues that the current codebase of TF-A has is the build system. It is unfit for the amount of options and dependencies of said options, and adding new features is now an effort of trying to add the new feature while not breaking the rest of the code. There is another problem. When the firmware is compiled with, say, OPTION=1, if it is recompiled with OPTION=0 without cleaning first, nothing will be rebuilt. We have had several discussions about this internally and we have decided to migrate to Kbuild/Kconfig, the build system used by the Linux kernel. There are already some projects using it, like U-Boot or Zephyr RTOS. We are starting the work related to this migration, and our intention is to migrate upstream platforms to this new build system. However, this change means that: - All non-upstream platforms will break until they update their makefiles. - Compilation under Windows won't be possible anymore without Cygwin or MinGW. We're open to comments. Regards, Antonio IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -- TF-A mailing list TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer TF-A mailing list TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a ------------------------------ End of TF-A Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1 **********************************

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A