Yep, I had an O not a zero. Don’t see a difference yet, but that definitely needed to be fixed. Thank you.
Ian Burres
Cybersecurity R&D
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 3:53 PM, tf-a-request(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org wrote:
>
> Send TF-A mailing list submissions to
> tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tf-a-request(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TF-A digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Spurious interrupt 1023 (Ian Burres)
> 2. Re: Spurious interrupt 1023 (Manish Pandey2)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:03:05 -0700
> From: Ian Burres <iburres(a)att.net>
> To: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com>,
> "tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org" <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
> Subject: Re: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
> Message-ID: <20210202210320.2C48741B32(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> UPDATE: I managed to get the Pi to complete the boot process, which is a major hurdle I have been trying to overcome.
>
> As for your questions Olivier:
>
> The vector table is loaded during bl31 (its called in the bl31_main.c main() function, right after bl31_platform_setup()). The Pi 4B uses GICv2 (your assumption was correct) and the BCM2711 chip.
>
> Right now both my irq and fiq handlers use: ID = gicv2_get_pending_interrupt_id(); to read the INTID.
>
> Neither handler does anything else other than print the ID, which returns 1023 for fiq only, using HS_DEBUG(). Nothing returns for irq.
>
> Build options are: PLAT=rpi4 DEBUG=1 LOG_LEVEL=50 RUNTIME_UART=2 GICV2_GO_FOR_EL3=1
>
> Wasn’t trying to route the UART RX interrupt to EL3, though that’s not a bad idea (FIFO, right?) . However, I have been exploring the idea of generating an ARM timer interrupt (not system timer), but I couldn’t get past the boot issue, which seems to have now been resolved.
>
> Questions: Do you see any reason why loading the vector table during the boot process will prevent interrupts from being routed to EL3 correctly? If you do not, then I think I can take it from here.
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Olivier Deprez
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:36 AM
> To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; AT&T
> Subject: Re: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> I guess we'll need a bit more details in order to help you.
> Which platform are you using? which GIC version is it using (looks like GICv2?) ?
> How did you built TF-A for this platform (command line arguments)?
> What is executing on your platform (e.g. linux in the non-secure world)? Is there any component in the SWd (apart from EL3 monitor) like a TEE?
> Are you trying to route the UART RX interrupt to EL3?
> Is this UART instance only owned by the SWd?
> How did you setup the interrupt handler?
> Which function are you using to read the INTID?
>
> Regards,
> Olivier.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of AT&T via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
> Sent: 29 January 2021 21:08
> To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> Subject: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
>
> I asked a similar question before, but I have since made some headway concerning routing fiq interrupts to EL3. I placed an HS_DEBUG command to print the ID, which returns 1023. The RX signal on one of the attached UARTs causes a solid red light and the debug message continuously loops. When I use the functions from gicv2.h, I receive an assertion error regarding MAX_SPI_ID, but the looping stops.
>
> I think the 1023 ID suggests non-secure is receiving a secure interrupt OR I’m dealing with a possible race condition. Any thoughts? Should I attach my code?
>
>
>
> Ian Burres
> Cybersecurity R&D
>
>
> --
> TF-A mailing list
> TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a
>
>
I have seen same thing in your previous thread also, could you please confirm that the build option GICV2_G0_FOR_EL3 instead of GICV2_GO_FOR_EL3 (zero instead of "O").
________________________________
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of Ian Burres via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent: 02 February 2021 21:03
To: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Subject: Re: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
UPDATE: I managed to get the Pi to complete the boot process, which is a major hurdle I have been trying to overcome.
As for your questions Olivier:
The vector table is loaded during bl31 (its called in the bl31_main.c main() function, right after bl31_platform_setup()). The Pi 4B uses GICv2 (your assumption was correct) and the BCM2711 chip.
Right now both my irq and fiq handlers use: ID = gicv2_get_pending_interrupt_id(); to read the INTID.
Neither handler does anything else other than print the ID, which returns 1023 for fiq only, using HS_DEBUG(). Nothing returns for irq.
Build options are: PLAT=rpi4 DEBUG=1 LOG_LEVEL=50 RUNTIME_UART=2 GICV2_GO_FOR_EL3=1
Wasn’t trying to route the UART RX interrupt to EL3, though that’s not a bad idea (FIFO, right?) . However, I have been exploring the idea of generating an ARM timer interrupt (not system timer), but I couldn’t get past the boot issue, which seems to have now been resolved.
Questions: Do you see any reason why loading the vector table during the boot process will prevent interrupts from being routed to EL3 correctly? If you do not, then I think I can take it from here.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Olivier Deprez<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:36 AM
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>; AT&T<mailto:iburres@att.net>
Subject: Re: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
Hi Ian,
I guess we'll need a bit more details in order to help you.
Which platform are you using? which GIC version is it using (looks like GICv2?) ?
How did you built TF-A for this platform (command line arguments)?
What is executing on your platform (e.g. linux in the non-secure world)? Is there any component in the SWd (apart from EL3 monitor) like a TEE?
Are you trying to route the UART RX interrupt to EL3?
Is this UART instance only owned by the SWd?
How did you setup the interrupt handler?
Which function are you using to read the INTID?
Regards,
Olivier.
________________________________________
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of AT&T via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent: 29 January 2021 21:08
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
I asked a similar question before, but I have since made some headway concerning routing fiq interrupts to EL3. I placed an HS_DEBUG command to print the ID, which returns 1023. The RX signal on one of the attached UARTs causes a solid red light and the debug message continuously loops. When I use the functions from gicv2.h, I receive an assertion error regarding MAX_SPI_ID, but the looping stops.
I think the 1023 ID suggests non-secure is receiving a secure interrupt OR I’m dealing with a possible race condition. Any thoughts? Should I attach my code?
Ian Burres
Cybersecurity R&D
--
TF-A mailing list
TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a
Hi Ian,
I guess we'll need a bit more details in order to help you.
Which platform are you using? which GIC version is it using (looks like GICv2?) ?
How did you built TF-A for this platform (command line arguments)?
What is executing on your platform (e.g. linux in the non-secure world)? Is there any component in the SWd (apart from EL3 monitor) like a TEE?
Are you trying to route the UART RX interrupt to EL3?
Is this UART instance only owned by the SWd?
How did you setup the interrupt handler?
Which function are you using to read the INTID?
Regards,
Olivier.
________________________________________
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of AT&T via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent: 29 January 2021 21:08
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: [TF-A] Spurious interrupt 1023
I asked a similar question before, but I have since made some headway concerning routing fiq interrupts to EL3. I placed an HS_DEBUG command to print the ID, which returns 1023. The RX signal on one of the attached UARTs causes a solid red light and the debug message continuously loops. When I use the functions from gicv2.h, I receive an assertion error regarding MAX_SPI_ID, but the looping stops.
I think the 1023 ID suggests non-secure is receiving a secure interrupt OR I’m dealing with a possible race condition. Any thoughts? Should I attach my code?
Ian Burres
Cybersecurity R&D
--
TF-A mailing list
TF-A(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-a
I asked a similar question before, but I have since made some headway concerning routing fiq interrupts to EL3. I placed an HS_DEBUG command to print the ID, which returns 1023. The RX signal on one of the attached UARTs causes a solid red light and the debug message continuously loops. When I use the functions from gicv2.h, I receive an assertion error regarding MAX_SPI_ID, but the looping stops.
I think the 1023 ID suggests non-secure is receiving a secure interrupt OR I’m dealing with a possible race condition. Any thoughts? Should I attach my code?
Ian Burres
Cybersecurity R&D
Hi Bin Wu,
Thanks for coming up with this question.
As per the below signature verification code, you raised a valid point that signature gets verified before ROTPK hash verification.
1. Get ROTPK hash from the platform (Using platform implemented method e.g., HW register).
2. Extract ROTPK from the image itself.
3. Use ROTPK to verify the image signature.
4. Calculate the hash of ROTPK and compare it against the hash received in step[1].
But we can't see any concern as the system fails to boot anyways at step [4] if the ROTPK gets corrupted.
Regards
Manish Badarkhe
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of 吴斌(郅隆) via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Date: Friday, 29 January 2021 at 07:55
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Subject: [TF-A] PK hash verify after signature virified
Hi All,
I am studying tbbr module in ATF recenlty. I have a little confusion about the ROTPK hash verify flow.
In ATF current implementation, we will verify the signature first, then verify the ROTPK hash.
But in my understanding, we should verify ROTPK first then verify signature.
So, what is the consideration that we use current flow in ATF?
Thanks for you patience
BRs,
Bin Wu
Hi All,
I am studying tbbr module in ATF recenlty. I have a little confusion about the ROTPK hash verify flow.
In ATF current implementation, we will verify the signature first, then verify the ROTPK hash.
But in my understanding, we should verify ROTPK first then verify signature.
So, what is the consideration that we use current flow in ATF?
Thanks for you patience
BRs,
Bin Wu
Hi All,
The next TF-A Tech Forum is scheduled for Thu 28th January 2021 16:00 – 17:00 (GMT).
Agenda:
* TF-A: Automotive Enhance (AE) Architecture Support Requirements Discussion
* Presented by Manish Pandy and Manish Badarkhe
* A discussion on the needs for the Automotive Enhance (AE) space and how TF-A can support that with CPU and GIC capabilities. The goal is to follow-up the recent email to the TF-A mailing list and try and understand project needs in this space by talking to the project community.
If TF-A contributors have anything they wish to present at any future TF-A tech forum please contact me to have that scheduled.
Previous sessions, both recording and presentation material can be found on the trustedfirmware.org TF-A Technical meeting webpage: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/
A scheduling tracking page is also available to help track sessions suggested: https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/w/tf_a/tf-a-tech-forum-scheduling/ Final decisions on what will be presented will be shared a few days before the next meeting on the TF-A mailing list.
Join Zoom Meeting
https://zoom.us/j/9159704974<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fj%2F9159704974&sa=D&us…>
Meeting ID: 915 970 4974
One tap mobile
+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)
+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)
Dial by your location
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
877 853 5247 US Toll-free
888 788 0099 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 915 970 4974
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…>
Thanks
Joanna
<Cc alias>
I guess, something went wrong when I clicked "Reply all" the first time.
Manish, can you also talk about the tasks that Arm is willing to work on? Then we can ask for volunteers for the remaining ones. I'm sure, NVIDIA will contribute as this topic is close to our heart.
-Varun
From: Manish Pandey2 <Manish.Pandey2(a)arm.com>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 8:05 AM
To: Varun Wadekar <vwadekar(a)nvidia.com>
Cc: Filipe Rinaldi <Filipe.Rinaldi(a)arm.com>; Robin Randhawa <Robin.Randhawa(a)ARM.com>; Ed Doxat <Ed.Doxat(a)arm.com>; Joanna Farley <joannafarley(a)icloud.com>; Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com>; Matteo Carlini <Matteo.Carlini(a)arm.com>; Doug Richmond <Doug.Richmond(a)arm.com>
Subject: Re: Gather GIC changes required for safety critical machines
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
++ Other Arm folks
Just realized that Varun has reduced the recipients(guess that was intentional)
________________________________
From: Manish Pandey2 <Manish.Pandey2(a)arm.com<mailto:Manish.Pandey2@arm.com>>
Sent: 25 January 2021 10:15
To: Varun Wadekar <vwadekar(a)nvidia.com<mailto:vwadekar@nvidia.com>>
Cc: Filipe Rinaldi <Filipe.Rinaldi(a)arm.com<mailto:Filipe.Rinaldi@arm.com>>; Robin Randhawa <Robin.Randhawa(a)ARM.com<mailto:Robin.Randhawa@ARM.com>>; Ed Doxat <Ed.Doxat(a)arm.com<mailto:Ed.Doxat@arm.com>>
Subject: Re: Gather GIC changes required for safety critical machines
Hi Varun,
We are trying to do both, based on interest from community we will prioritize these tasks.
The reason why we can't do all the asks (mentioned in the list) ourselves is, currently we do not have "use cases/platforms" to test all the features, so we would rely on wider community to understand the requirements and work together to develop/test those features.
Thanks
Manish
________________________________
From: Varun Wadekar <vwadekar(a)nvidia.com<mailto:vwadekar@nvidia.com>>
Sent: 22 January 2021 17:46
To: Manish Pandey2 <Manish.Pandey2(a)arm.com<mailto:Manish.Pandey2@arm.com>>
Cc: Filipe Rinaldi <Filipe.Rinaldi(a)arm.com<mailto:Filipe.Rinaldi@arm.com>>; Robin Randhawa <Robin.Randhawa(a)ARM.com<mailto:Robin.Randhawa@ARM.com>>; Ed Doxat <Ed.Doxat(a)arm.com<mailto:Ed.Doxat@arm.com>>
Subject: RE: Gather GIC changes required for safety critical machines
HI Manish,
Thanks for starting this discussion. The list captures all the functionalities that are useful and interesting to us.
Trying to understand the ask - are you trying to get feedback to allow you to prioritize the feature list? Or are you asking for the community to rate importance of these requirements?
I am afraid, if there isn't enough interest the list might be trimmed which would be an absolute shame.
-Varun
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> On Behalf Of Manish Pandey2 via TF-A
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 8:02 AM
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Cc: Filipe Rinaldi <Filipe.Rinaldi(a)arm.com<mailto:Filipe.Rinaldi@arm.com>>; Robin Randhawa <Robin.Randhawa(a)ARM.com<mailto:Robin.Randhawa@ARM.com>>; Ed Doxat <Ed.Doxat(a)arm.com<mailto:Ed.Doxat@arm.com>>
Subject: [TF-A] Gather GIC changes required for safety critical machines
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Hi,
GIC600-AE is variant of GIC for safety critical machines, though its TRM is publicly available from quite some time but currently we do not have support in TF-A.
Purpose of this email is to kick start discussions around various possible GIC requirements as far as safety critical machines are concerned.
We have created following list of requirements based on inputs we got so far, changes are either adding new AE features or enhancements to existing drivers.
GIC-600AE feature requirement:
- Inject and detect RAS errors using Fault management unit(FMU)
- Validating feature parity with GIC600
- Running GIC IP in Dual core Lock-step(DCLS) mode.
GIC/RAS driver enhancements:
- Read trace and PMU records
- Keep RAS error records alive across a reset
- Disable GICR frames of fused-off cores
- Support for message signalled interrupts
- Saving/Restoring additional GIC registers during PM events
Feel free to add any additional requirements.
If there is enough community interest during the next Tech-forum meeting(28th Jan) we would like to go through these requirements in more detail.
Thanks
Manish
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
v9: - cosmetic changes (move if from patch2 to patch3, rename function name
and define).
v8: - use gpio 0 and 1, align dtb with kernel gpio-restart, gpio-poweroff,
change define names, trigger on upper front. (Peter Maydell).
v7: - same as v6, but resplit patches: patch 2 no function changes and refactor
gpio setup for virt platfrom and patch 3 adds secure gpio.
v6: - 64k align gpio memory region (Andrew Jones)
- adjusted memory region to map this address in the corresponding atf patch
v5: - removed vms flag, added fdt (Andrew Jones)
- added patch3 to combine secure and non secure pl061. It has to be
more easy to review if this changes are in the separate patch.
v4: rework patches accodring to Peter Maydells comments:
- split patches on gpio-pwr driver and arm-virt integration.
- start secure gpio only from virt-6.0.
- rework qemu interface for gpio-pwr to use 2 named gpio.
- put secure gpio to secure name space.
v3: added missed include qemu/log.h for qemu_log(..
v2: replace printf with qemu_log (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
This patch works together with ATF patch:
https://github.com/muvarov/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/886965bddb0624bdf851…
Maxim Uvarov (3):
hw: gpio: implement gpio-pwr driver for qemu reset/poweroff
arm-virt: refactor gpios creation
arm-virt: add secure pl061 for reset/power down
hw/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
hw/gpio/Kconfig | 3 ++
hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/gpio/meson.build | 1 +
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c
--
2.17.1
Hi,
GIC600-AE is variant of GIC for safety critical machines, though its TRM is publicly available from quite some time but currently we do not have support in TF-A.
Purpose of this email is to kick start discussions around various possible GIC requirements as far as safety critical machines are concerned.
We have created following list of requirements based on inputs we got so far, changes are either adding new AE features or enhancements to existing drivers.
GIC-600AE feature requirement:
- Inject and detect RAS errors using Fault management unit(FMU)
- Validating feature parity with GIC600
- Running GIC IP in Dual core Lock-step(DCLS) mode.
GIC/RAS driver enhancements:
- Read trace and PMU records
- Keep RAS error records alive across a reset
- Disable GICR frames of fused-off cores
- Support for message signalled interrupts
- Saving/Restoring additional GIC registers during PM events
Feel free to add any additional requirements.
If there is enough community interest during the next Tech-forum meeting(28th Jan) we would like to go through these requirements in more detail.
Thanks
Manish
v8: - use gpio 0 and 1, align dtb with kernel gpio-restart, gpio-poweroff,
change define names, trigger on upper front. (Peter Maydell).
v7: - same as v6, but resplit patches: patch 2 no function changes and refactor
gpio setup for virt platfrom and patch 3 adds secure gpio.
v6: - 64k align gpio memory region (Andrew Jones)
- adjusted memory region to map this address in the corresponding atf patch
v5: - removed vms flag, added fdt (Andrew Jones)
- added patch3 to combine secure and non secure pl061. It has to be
more easy to review if this changes are in the separate patch.
v4: rework patches accodring to Peter Maydells comments:
- split patches on gpio-pwr driver and arm-virt integration.
- start secure gpio only from virt-6.0.
- rework qemu interface for gpio-pwr to use 2 named gpio.
- put secure gpio to secure name space.
v3: added missed include qemu/log.h for qemu_log(..
v2: replace printf with qemu_log (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
This patch works together with ATF patch:
https://github.com/muvarov/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/886965bddb0624bdf851…
Maxim Uvarov (3):
hw: gpio: implement gpio-pwr driver for qemu reset/poweroff
arm-virt: refactor gpios creation
arm-virt: add secure pl061 for reset/power down
hw/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
hw/gpio/Kconfig | 3 ++
hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/gpio/meson.build | 1 +
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c
--
2.17.1
v7: - same as v6, but resplit patches: patch 2 no function changes and refactor
gpio setup for virt platfrom and patch 3 adds secure gpio.
v6: - 64k align gpio memory region (Andrew Jones)
- adjusted memory region to map this address in the corresponding atf patch
v5: - removed vms flag, added fdt (Andrew Jones)
- added patch3 to combine secure and non secure pl061. It has to be
more easy to review if this changes are in the separate patch.
v4: rework patches accodring to Peter Maydells comments:
- split patches on gpio-pwr driver and arm-virt integration.
- start secure gpio only from virt-6.0.
- rework qemu interface for gpio-pwr to use 2 named gpio.
- put secure gpio to secure name space.
v3: added missed include qemu/log.h for qemu_log(..
v2: replace printf with qemu_log (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
This patch works together with ATF patch:
https://github.com/muvarov/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/7556d07e87f755c602cd…
Previus discussion for reboot issue was here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg757705.html
Maxim Uvarov (3):
hw: gpio: implement gpio-pwr driver for qemu reset/poweroff
arm-virt: refactor gpios creation
arm-virt: add secure pl061 for reset/power down
hw/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
hw/gpio/Kconfig | 3 ++
hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/gpio/meson.build | 1 +
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c
--
2.17.1
v6: - 64k align gpio memory region (Andrew Jones)
- adjusted memory region to map this address in the corresponding atf patch
v5: - removed vms flag, added fdt (Andrew Jones)
- added patch3 to combine secure and non secure pl061. It has to be
more easy to review if this changes are in the separate patch.
v4: rework patches accodring to Peter Maydells comments:
- split patches on gpio-pwr driver and arm-virt integration.
- start secure gpio only from virt-6.0.
- rework qemu interface for gpio-pwr to use 2 named gpio.
- put secure gpio to secure name space.
v3: added missed include qemu/log.h for qemu_log(..
v2: replace printf with qemu_log (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
This patch works together with ATF patch:
https://github.com/muvarov/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/7556d07e87f755c602cd…
Previus discussion for reboot issue was here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg757705.html
Maxim Uvarov (3):
hw: gpio: implement gpio-pwr driver for qemu reset/poweroff
arm-virt: add secure pl061 for reset/power down
arm-virt: combine code for secure and non secure pl061
hw/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
hw/gpio/Kconfig | 3 ++
hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/gpio/meson.build | 1 +
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c
--
2.17.1
This event has been cancelled with this note:
"Cancelled - see the mail from Joanna for more details"
Title: TF-A Tech Forum
We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not
restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the
guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to
colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the
Trusted Firmware website. Details are
here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Tr…
Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom
Meetinghttps://zoom.us/j/9159704974Meeting ID: 915 970 4974One tap
mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US
(San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558
8656 US (New York) +1 669 900
9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US
Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID:
915 970 4974Find your local
number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h
When: Thu 14 Jan 2021 16:00 – 17:00 United Kingdom Time
Calendar: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Who:
* Bill Fletcher- creator
* marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com
* okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com
* tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/
You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org because you are an attendee of this event.
To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event.
Alternatively, you can sign up for a Google Account at
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification
settings for your entire calendar.
Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to
the organiser and be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of
their own invitation status or to modify your RSVP. Learn more at
https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
Apologies for the late notice I am cancelling this weeks TF-A Tech forum tomorrow as the subject I had hoped to get presented is not ready and I don’t have any alternative for this slot.
I will look to have something for the next session on 28th January.
Apologies for the late notice. Cancellations of the calendar invite will come from trustedformware.org as I don’t own the invite so it may not appear in your calendars until that is sent out.
Thanks
Joanna
v5: - removed vms flag, added fdt (Andrew Jones)
- added patch3 to combine secure and non secure pl061. It has to be
more easy to review if this changes are in the separate patch.
v4: rework patches accodring to Peter Maydells comments:
- split patches on gpio-pwr driver and arm-virt integration.
- start secure gpio only from virt-6.0.
- rework qemu interface for gpio-pwr to use 2 named gpio.
- put secure gpio to secure name space.
v3: added missed include qemu/log.h for qemu_log(..
v2: replace printf with qemu_log (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
This patch works together with ATF patch:
https://github.com/muvarov/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/dd4401d8eb8e0f3018b3…
Previus discussion for reboot issue was here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg757705.html
Maxim Uvarov (3):
hw: gpio: implement gpio-pwr driver for qemu reset/poweroff
arm-virt: add secure pl061 for reset/power down
arm-virt: combine code for secure and non secure pl061
hw/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
hw/gpio/Kconfig | 3 ++
hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/gpio/meson.build | 1 +
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hw/gpio/gpio_pwr.c
--
2.17.1
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 1 of 1 defect(s)
** CID 365287: Control flow issues (MISSING_BREAK)
/plat/xilinx/zynqmp/pm_service/pm_svc_main.c: 334 in pm_smc_handler()
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*** CID 365287: Control flow issues (MISSING_BREAK)
/plat/xilinx/zynqmp/pm_service/pm_svc_main.c: 334 in pm_smc_handler()
328 SMC_RET1(handle, (uint64_t)ret);
329
330 case PM_SET_MAX_LATENCY:
331 ret = pm_set_max_latency(pm_arg[0], pm_arg[1]);
332 SMC_RET1(handle, (uint64_t)ret);
333
>>> CID 365287: Control flow issues (MISSING_BREAK)
>>> The case for value "PM_GET_API_VERSION" is not terminated by a 'break' statement.
334 case PM_GET_API_VERSION:
335 /* Check is PM API version already verified */
336 if (pm_ctx.api_version >= PM_VERSION) {
337 if (!ipi_irq_flag) {
338 /*
339 * Enable IPI IRQ
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=HRESupC-2F2Czv4BOaCWWCy7my0P…
Hi
To understand the interrupt handling in TF-A, i recommend you go through https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/design/interrupt-framewo…
To debug your problem, you need to first check if the timer interrupt is generated as FIQ and check whether it indeed is trapped in EL3 (checking SCR_EL3.FIQ=1).
Regarding build errors while adding .S files and your assembly implementation, it will be better if you share your code (may be pushing a patch on https://review.trustedfirmware.org).
Thanks
Manish
________________________________
From: TF-A <tf-a-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> on behalf of Ian Burres via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent: 06 January 2021 17:56
To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Subject: [TF-A] Routing FIQ timer interrupts to EL3 on Raspberry Pi 4B
I am attempting to route FIQ timer interrupts using the ARM timers (not system timers) to EL3 in order to achieve introspection. I am running TF-A (cross compiled for AArch64/AArch32) on a Raspberry Pi 4B, which uses the Broadcom 2711 chipset. I have written some code, but I am not an embedded software engineer – I’m an IoT pentester. The ARM timers look like this:
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_LOAD 0x400
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_VALUE 0x404
…..
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_FREE_COUNTER 0x420
System timers are:
RPI4_SYS_TIMER_CLO, RPI4_SYS_TIMER_CS, etc…
I have successfully implement a Linux driver that allows me to dump kernel page tables and memory; however, I cannot see user page tables (even after running a CPU intensive program ). I believe the only way to view user page tables is to have interrupts routed to EL3 – a Linux driver is not sufficient. I have 3 UARTs attached with a debug log and screen setup. From what I have read, the Raspberry Pi 4B uses GICv2. TF-A supports EL3 routing when the build option GICV2_GO_FOR_EL3 is enabled, which I have done.
>From what I have gathered, the FIQ interrupt has to be written in assembly. So far, I have created a vector table, loaded the vector table, and masked and unmasked interrupts using daifclr, #3 and daifset, #3 instructions, using inline assembly. The timer is initinitialized and handled using C functions. I am using inline assembly, because I am adding code to the TF-A base, and I have not discovered how to add .S files to the build without receiving make errors. I will gladly share the code I have if it helps, but what I am really looking for is if anyone believes I am on the right track or not. Obviously, I am not implementing something correctly since the interrupt is not being handled. Thanks.
Thomas
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
I am attempting to route FIQ timer interrupts using the ARM timers (not system timers) to EL3 in order to achieve introspection. I am running TF-A (cross compiled for AArch64/AArch32) on a Raspberry Pi 4B, which uses the Broadcom 2711 chipset. I have written some code, but I am not an embedded software engineer – I’m an IoT pentester. The ARM timers look like this:
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_LOAD 0x400
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_VALUE 0x404
…..
RPI4_ARM_TIMER_FREE_COUNTER 0x420
System timers are:
RPI4_SYS_TIMER_CLO, RPI4_SYS_TIMER_CS, etc…
I have successfully implement a Linux driver that allows me to dump kernel page tables and memory; however, I cannot see user page tables (even after running a CPU intensive program ). I believe the only way to view user page tables is to have interrupts routed to EL3 – a Linux driver is not sufficient. I have 3 UARTs attached with a debug log and screen setup. >From what I have read, the Raspberry Pi 4B uses GICv2. TF-A supports EL3 routing when the build option GICV2_GO_FOR_EL3 is enabled, which I have done.
>From what I have gathered, the FIQ interrupt has to be written in assembly. So far, I have created a vector table, loaded the vector table, and masked and unmasked interrupts using daifclr, #3 and daifset, #3 instructions, using inline assembly. The timer is initinitialized and handled using C functions. I am using inline assembly, because I am adding code to the TF-A base, and I have not discovered how to add .S files to the build without receiving make errors. I will gladly share the code I have if it helps, but what I am really looking for is if anyone believes I am on the right track or not. Obviously, I am not implementing something correctly since the interrupt is not being handled. Thanks.
Thomas
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Hi Carlo
Alexei created a patch for testing TF-A/TFTF builds with the toolchain GCC 10.2-2020.11
https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/ci/tf-a-ci-scripts/+/7733
which flagged build errors for plat/amlogic/axg platform, please see below:
Build command lines:
make CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-elf- PLAT=axg SPD=opteed DEBUG=1 V=1 fiptool all
make AML_USE_ATOS=1 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-elf- PLAT=axg DEBUG=1 V=1 fiptool all
plat/amlogic/axg/axg_pm.c: In function 'axg_pwr_domain_off':
plat/amlogic/axg/axg_pm.c:124:43: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'const plat_local_state_t[2]' {aka 'const unsigned char[2]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
124 | if (target_state->pwr_domain_state[MPIDR_AFFLVL2] ==
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from plat/amlogic/axg/axg_pm.c:14:
include/lib/psci/psci.h:270:28: note: while referencing 'pwr_domain_state'
270 | plat_local_state_t pwr_domain_state[PLAT_MAX_PWR_LVL + U(1)];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Makefile:1103: recipe for target '/work/workspace/workspace/tf-worker/trusted_firmware/build/axg/debug/bl31/axg_pm.o' failed
make: *** [/work/workspace/workspace/tf-worker/trusted_firmware/build/axg/debug/bl31/axg_pm.o] Error 1
Please help to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe