This is a test message. I know that Feder have posted to the list but message was not delivered.

From: TF-M tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org On Behalf Of Kevin Townsend via TF-M Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:31 AM To: Glaropoulos, Ioannis Ioannis.Glaropoulos@nordicsemi.no Cc: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: Re: [TF-M] Supporting integrated Non-Secure RTOS applications that use the FPU

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 09:23, Glaropoulos, Ioannis <Ioannis.Glaropoulos@nordicsemi.nomailto:Ioannis.Glaropoulos@nordicsemi.no> wrote: Once more, I am stressing that our questions concern the usage of FPU in Non-Secure applications that integrate with TF-M today; it is not about future improvements for FPU support inside TF-M, which was (I guess) the main point of this presentation. Looking at this a bit further it is indeed a serious issue, since most modern applications are going to want to make use of the FPU. This prevents the FPU from being used inside NS interrupts as well.

I’m not sure if there are currently any change requests that identify or fix this problem (I’ll look), but it’s something that should have some sort of test on the NS side, for sure.

Do you mind filing the details on TF-M’s phabricator and it can more easily be tracked there?

Thanks for bringing this up, Kevin