Hi Reed,
Thanks for the input. We name the dual-core/multi-core feature control option flag as `TFM_MULTI_CORE_TOPOLOGY` for a general model.
But as Chris said, it would require additional work to design and support more complicated scenarios. Thus for the current particular patches for dual-core platform, I'd like to specify the topic a little as "dualcpu".
Best regards, Hu Ziji
-----Original Message----- From: Reed Hinkel Reed.Hinkel@arm.com Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 5:45 AM To: Christopher Brand chris.brand@cypress.com; Andrej Butok andrey.butok@nxp.com; David Hu (Arm Technology China) David.Hu@arm.com Subject: Re: [TF-M] Change dual-core patch topic name "twincpu" to "dualcpu"
Makes sense!
All the best! Reed
On 11/8/19, 11:05 AM, "Christopher Brand" chris.brand@cypress.com wrote:
I think that's actually an argument in favour of "dualcpu" for what we have now, because I suspect there would be significant work needed to support an additional core.
Chris
> -----Original Message----- > From: TF-M tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org On Behalf Of Reed > Hinkel via TF-M > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 6:53 AM > To: Andrej Butok andrey.butok@nxp.com; David Hu (Arm Technology > China) David.Hu@arm.com > Cc: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org > Subject: Re: [TF-M] Change dual-core patch topic name "twincpu" to > "dualcpu" > > Just food for thought, but in the future some devices may have more than > two cores, but still with one core dedicated to RoT functions. > > -Reed > > On 11/8/19, 2:32 AM, "TF-M on behalf of Andrej Butok via TF-M" <tf-m- > bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org on behalf of tf- > m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote: > > OK. We use "dual", so it's better ;) > > -----Original Message----- > From: TF-M tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org On Behalf Of David > Hu (Arm Technology China) via TF-M > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 9:16 AM > To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org > Cc: nd nd@arm.com > Subject: [TF-M] Change dual-core patch topic name "twincpu" to "dualcpu" > > Hi all, > > As you know, the current topic for dual-core patches is “twincpu”. > In my very own opinion, keyword “twin” implies that the two cores are the > same in the system. However, the two cores can be in different archs or > even heterogeneous in a dual-core system. > > Thus I’d like to propose to change the topic name to “dualcpu” to > > * Cover larger scope of dual-core topology/system. > * Align with the description in dual PE-based isolation section in TBSA-M > spec > > Could you please let me know if you have any concern about that change? > Any feedback or suggestion is welcome. 😊 > Thank you. > > Best regards, > Hu Ziji > -- > TF-M mailing list > TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.t > rustedfirmware.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftf- > m&data=02%7C01%7Candrey.butok%40nxp.com%7C9dc8588da6e2436e > 754508d76423ef30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63 > 7087977806556698&sdata=it6Hfh2Vk9A5FUFudmNn206LYO9Wb8lOattG > %2FWsm2%2Bo%3D&reserved=0 > -- > TF-M mailing list > TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org > https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any > other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any > medium. Thank you. > -- > TF-M mailing list > TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org > https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org