Hi Bohdan,
There is usage of "short_name". You should be able to remove it.
Hi Chris, I think we should avoid duplicating the attributes between manifests and manifest lists. Could be confusing to have same attributes in different files. The manifest tool should directly refer to the "name" in manifests and then the one in manifest lists can be removed as well.
Best Regards, Kevin
From: Bohdan.Hunko--- via TF-M tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Sent: Friday, August 5, 2022 1:42 AM To: Chris.Brand@infineon.com; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [TF-M] Re: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Hi everyone,
I don't actually see any usage of "short_name" manifest field. Also this field is present in generated files list (tools/tfm_generated_file_list.yaml) but also not used.
Should "short_name" field be removed, or I am missing something?
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com
From: Chris.Brand--- via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2022 19:45 To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [TF-M] Re: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safehttps://intranet-content.infineon.com/explore/aboutinfineon/rules/informationsecurity/ug/SocialEngineering/Pages/SocialEngineeringElements_en.aspx.
It would be nice if the manifest list files used "name" and "description" rather than "short_name" and "name", to be consistent with the manifest files.
Chris
From: Hunko Bohdan (CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW 3) <Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com> Sent: August 4, 2022 1:12 AM To: Kevin Peng <Kevin.Peng@arm.commailto:Kevin.Peng@arm.com>; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Brand Chris (CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1) <Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com>; Kamath Dheeraj (CYSC CSS ICW APP IAE) <Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com> Subject: RE: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply. I will create a patch for that and will add you as a reviewer.
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com
From: Kevin Peng <Kevin.Peng@arm.commailto:Kevin.Peng@arm.com> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2022 05:22 To: Hunko Bohdan (CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW 3) <Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com>; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Brand Chris (CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1) <Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com>; Kamath Dheeraj (CYSC CSS ICW APP IAE) <Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com> Subject: RE: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safehttps://intranet-content.infineon.com/explore/aboutinfineon/rules/informationsecurity/ug/SocialEngineering/Pages/SocialEngineeringElements_en.aspx.
Hi Bohdan,
Yes, the names should be "xxx Partition". I guess they are called "service" because the first a few "services" are created prior to FF-M and there was no concept of "Partition". Only my guess. Anyway, they should be changed to "Partition".
Best Regards, Kevin
From: Bohdan.Hunko--- via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 3:47 AM To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com; Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com Subject: [TF-M] Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Hi everyone,
From what I see manifest lists (e.g. tools/tfm_manifest_list.yaml) describe partitions, but "name" field there (which is a description of the partition) uses "Service" word, for example: "name": "Protected Storage Service",
Shouldn't this be "name": "Protected Storage Partition" ? Why do TFM uses Service when describing the Partition?
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com