Hi Brian,
some numbers have been shared in this presentation from a while ago:
Microsoft PowerPoint - TF-M Performance Improvement in v1.5.0.pptx (trustedfirmware.org)https://www.trustedfirmware.org/docs/tf-m_forum_20211209-TF-M_Performance-Improvement-in-v1.5.0.pdf
I believe there should be more updated numbers on more recent versions, but I don't seem to find them, maybe somebody else with more updated benchmarking can help here.
Thanks, Antonio
________________________________ From: Quach, Brian via TF-M tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 00:26 To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [TF-M] SFN vs IPC partition with IPC backend
If using IPC backend, how much performance and/or memory savings is there when using SFN vs IPC partition model?
I saw FF-M v1.1 recommended SFN partition model but it was not clear to me why it was preferred.
Regards,
Brian Quach
SimpleLink MCU
Texas Instruments Inc.
12500 TI Blvd, MS F-4000
Dallas, TX 75243
214-479-4076