Hi Alan,
Yeah, I see your proposed changes in the email.
We will make the corrections under my task T435.
Thanks,
Summer
________________________________ From: DeMars, Alan ademars@ti.com Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 11:30 AM To: Summer Qin (Arm Technology China) Summer.Qin@arm.com Cc: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org; nd nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [TF-M] [EXTERNAL] [Maniphest] [Closed] T435: PSA APIs alignment
Summer,
The email I sent with the attachment was bounced back so I sent another one afterwards that detailed the changes I had to make. I’d rather someone on your team make the corrections to make sure they’re sufficient.
Alan
On Jul 28, 2019, at 7:41 PM, Summer Qin (Arm Technology China) Summer.Qin@arm.com wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thanks for pointing out this issue.
The patch related to PSA APIs alignment task is the first patch to align the PSA APIs, we will have some following patches to update. In your last email, I didn't see the attachment, maybe blocked by the system. If it is convenient for you, could you push your patch to https://review.trustedfirmware.org , or you can create one ticket in https://developer.trustedfirmware.org and upload your changes as attachment in the new created task. Attached the change under my task T435 is also OK. We can help to submit the changes for you.
Thanks, Summer
On 7/28/19, 4:39 PM, "TF-M on behalf of DeMars, Alan via TF-M" <tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org on behalf of tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote:
I found several other code points in tfm_svcalls.c that need to be enhanced to handle 'type' >= PSA_IPC_CALL.
Attached is my modified tfm_svcalls.c file. With these modifications, the 'type' argument makes its way through the system without causing tfm_panic() to be invoked.
Alan
-----Original Message----- From: TF-M [mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org] On Behalf Of DeMars, Alan via TF-M Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 2:28 PM To: Ken Liu (Arm Technology China) Cc: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: Re: [TF-M] [EXTERNAL] [Maniphest] [Closed] T435: PSA APIs alignment
In order to pass along the new ‘type’ argument in psa_call, it seems that this line in tfm_svcalls.c:
msg = tfm_spm_create_msg(service, handle, PSA_IPC_CALL, ns_caller, invecs, in_num, outvecs, out_num, outptr);Should be:
msg = tfm_spm_create_msg(service, handle, type, ns_caller, invecs, in_num, outvecs, out_num, outptr);Otherwise the receiving SP will always see msg.type == PSA_IPC_CALL.
Alan
From: Summer-ARM (Summer Qin) [mailto:noreply@developer.trustedfirmware.org] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:14 PM To: DeMars, Alan Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Maniphest] [Closed] T435: PSA APIs alignment
Summer-ARM closed this task as "Resolved".
TASK DETAIL https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/T435
EMAIL PREFERENCES https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Summer-ARM Cc: edison-ai, matetothpal, adeaarm, wmnt, ashutoshksingh, KenLSoft, Summer-ARM, akiannillo, ademars, zhengwang721, BabaYB, karl-zh, shebuk, zbh, qixiang, DarshpreetSabharwal, jamesking1, mmorenobarm, abhishek-pandit -- TF-M mailing list TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m -- TF-M mailing list TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m