Hi everyone,
I don't actually see any usage of "short_name" manifest field. Also this field is present in generated files list (tools/tfm_generated_file_list.yaml) but also not used.
Should "short_name" field be removed, or I am missing something?
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com
From: Chris.Brand--- via TF-M tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2022 19:45 To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [TF-M] Re: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safehttps://intranet-content.infineon.com/explore/aboutinfineon/rules/informationsecurity/ug/SocialEngineering/Pages/SocialEngineeringElements_en.aspx.
It would be nice if the manifest list files used "name" and "description" rather than "short_name" and "name", to be consistent with the manifest files.
Chris
From: Hunko Bohdan (CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW 3) <Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com> Sent: August 4, 2022 1:12 AM To: Kevin Peng <Kevin.Peng@arm.commailto:Kevin.Peng@arm.com>; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Brand Chris (CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1) <Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com>; Kamath Dheeraj (CYSC CSS ICW APP IAE) <Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com> Subject: RE: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply. I will create a patch for that and will add you as a reviewer.
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com
From: Kevin Peng <Kevin.Peng@arm.commailto:Kevin.Peng@arm.com> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2022 05:22 To: Hunko Bohdan (CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW 3) <Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com>; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Brand Chris (CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1) <Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com>; Kamath Dheeraj (CYSC CSS ICW APP IAE) <Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com> Subject: RE: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safehttps://intranet-content.infineon.com/explore/aboutinfineon/rules/informationsecurity/ug/SocialEngineering/Pages/SocialEngineeringElements_en.aspx.
Hi Bohdan,
Yes, the names should be "xxx Partition". I guess they are called "service" because the first a few "services" are created prior to FF-M and there was no concept of "Partition". Only my guess. Anyway, they should be changed to "Partition".
Best Regards, Kevin
From: Bohdan.Hunko--- via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 3:47 AM To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Chris.Brand@infineon.commailto:Chris.Brand@infineon.com; Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.commailto:Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com Subject: [TF-M] Service vs Partition wording in manifest files
Hi everyone,
From what I see manifest lists (e.g. tools/tfm_manifest_list.yaml) describe partitions, but "name" field there (which is a description of the partition) uses "Service" word, for example: "name": "Protected Storage Service",
Shouldn't this be "name": "Protected Storage Partition" ? Why do TFM uses Service when describing the Partition?
Regards, Bohdan Hunko
Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine Engineer CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW Mobile: +38099 50 19 714 Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.commailto:Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com