Hello,
Reminder: we are still in progress to collect the requirements and investigating, anything new or questions please reply in the mailing list.
Check Anton’s mail (below) to recall the content 😉
BR
/Ken
From: Anton Komlev via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: June 26, 2023 2:31 AM To: Edward Yang via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.orgmailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Cc: nd <nd@arm.commailto:nd@arm.com> Subject: [TF-M] Hybrid platforms discussion follow up.
Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safehttps://intranet-content.infineon.com/explore/aboutinfineon/rules/informationsecurity/ug/SocialEngineering/Pages/SocialEngineeringElements_en.aspx.
Hi,
On the last tech forum (June 22) we started discussion on multicore hybrid platforms. By this mail I’d like to follow up and continue offline analyses on new use-cases and requirements for TF-M design update.
The recorded session is available here: https://linaro-org.zoom.us/rec/share/yseF-mYwUTtHHPkQJQO6IEv72xCd0Lz1pQQecc2..., Passcode: 5s=Npv=w and slides: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/docs/tech_forum_20230622_Hybrid_platforms.pd...
The current plan is to take time, think on the use-cases and map them on requirements. With more thought and materials, we will have another session about September time to define our needs in the support of new type of platform.
Please share your thoughts in reply.
Thanks, Anton