Hello,
The agenda is empty since no topics were proposed.
I will start the session anyway for ad-hoc discussions or Q&A, but feel free to treat it as cancelled and enjoy your vacation season.
The best,
Anton Komlev
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: 12 August 2020 13:56
To: 'tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org' <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: [TF-M] TF-M Technical Forum call - August 20
Hello,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, August 20 at 6:00-07:00 UTC (Asia time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Recording and slides of previous meetings are here:
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/
Best regards,
Anton Komlev
Hi Everyone,
As mentioned in https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m.git/tree/docs/contr…, we would like to propose the deprecation of AN539 MPS2 platform and remove the same from TF-M master after next release. As per the process, this proposal will be open for discussion for a period of 4 weeks and if there are no major objections, the platform will be marked as deprecated.
Thanks & Regards
Soby Mathew
Hi all
The review window has closed as promised.
I'd like to merge the changes by 13th, Aug (Tomorrow).
To be noted that any changes for TF-M/test or TF-M/app will have to "rebase" to the tf-m-tests repo after the merge.
Will let you know when the merge is done.
Best Regards,
Kevin
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Kevin Peng via TF-M
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 10:16 AM
To: 'tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org' <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: [TF-M] [RFC]Patches for migrating testing codes from TF-M to tf-m-tests
Hi,
As have shared on the tech forum yesterday, there is the activity to move the test codes from tf-m to tf-m-tests.
Here are the patches for the step 1 - moving the codes without modifications:
https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/topic:%22Migration_of_test_code%22+(st…
Please help on review. Thanks.
The review window would be closed in one week in case of no comments.
Best Regards,
Kevin
Hello,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, August 20 at 6:00-07:00 UTC (Asia time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Recording and slides of previous meetings are here:
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-m-technical-forum/
Best regards,
Anton Komlev
Hello,
This is a kind reminder on TF-M repository change below.
The old URL will be alive for the following 3 months before depreciation.
Regards,
Anton
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: 14 May 2020 15:32
To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com>
Subject: [TF-M] TF-M repository restructure
Hello,
Let me announce the changes in TF-M project repository structure. To allow project grow up in a more organized way the existing codebase will be split on multiple repositories and placed under TF-M folder. This is the similar structure as all other projects have in git.trustedfirmware.org<https://git.trustedfirmware.org>.
This weekend TF-M git repository will be moved
from https://git.trustedfirmware.org/trusted-firmware-m.git
to https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m.git
The original URL will be supported for some time (as a link to the new one) giving time for adjustment. Current plan is to keep the redirection for 6 months but let me know please, if it makes any conflict and another depreciation period is better.
Best regards,
Anton Komlev
Hi Everyone
The following patch updates the crypto service in TF-M to use the latest mbedTLS tag v2.23.0. All reviews for the same will be much appreciated.
https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m/+/5252/1
With this update, additional PSA APIs psa_hash_compute() and psa_hash_compare() are now supported.
There is also another patch for platforms to update the ITS_MAX_ASSET_SIZE when testing with PSA Crypto API compliance test as one of the tests require a larger size: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m/+/5253/1 . Could the platform owners review the same and let me know whether the size changes are OK ?
With the above patches, the API compliance remains the same as v1.0 Beta 3 and the PSA Crypto compliance test suite gives the below results (as tested on AN521) :
************ Crypto Suite Report **********
TOTAL TESTS : 61
TOTAL PASSED : 42
TOTAL SIM ERROR : 0
TOTAL FAILED : 17
TOTAL SKIPPED : 2
******************************************
Best Regards
Soby Mathew
Hello,
The agenda for this forum:
1. Musca-B1 Secure Enclave solution
2. Platform specific vs common scatter/link scripts
3. Any Other Business
See you,
Anton Komlev
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Mark Horvath via TF-M
Sent: 03 August 2020 12:13
To: 'tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org' <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Subject: Re: [TF-M] TF-M Technical Forum call - August 6
Hi,
I would like to talk a little about the Musca-B1 Secure Enclave solution
I plan it to 15 minutes +questions.
Best regards,
Mark
From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> On Behalf Of Anton Komlev via TF-M
Sent: 28 July 2020 19:24
To: 'tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org' <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>
Cc: nd <nd(a)arm.com<mailto:nd@arm.com>>
Subject: [TF-M] TF-M Technical Forum call - August 6
Hello,
The next Technical Forum is planned on Thursday, August 6 at 15:00-16:00 UTC (US time zone).
Please reply on this email with your proposals for agenda topics.
Best regards,
Anton Komlev
Hi all,
There are many differences in linker scripts between each platform. Using a common_s.sct/ld makes it too complicated.
And at the same time, in order to achieve isolation level 3, the position of the sessions in scatter and linker script file needs to be adjusted.
The common linker scripts would be more complicated with isolation L3.
So I would like to propose to have dedicated linker scripts for platforms with enough differential arrangements.
What's your opinion on this?
Best regards,
Shawn
