Hello,
I have noticed, that with adding the IPC feature to master branch, it were updated GCC linker files (#ifdef TFM_PSA_API sections), but ARMCLANG linker files are without any change.
Does it mean that IPC was developed and tested only using GCC? Is there a plan to updated the armclang linker files?
Thanks,
Andrej Butok
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 06:51:04PM +0000, Christopher Brand via TF-M wrote:
>I've posted a design document for bootloader changes to support twin
>cpu at
>https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/w/tf_m/design/twin-cpu/bootloader/
There are efforts underway to get the TF-M changes to the bootloader
contributed back to the upstream MCUboot project.
We should be trying to make sure that we continue this effort, as well
as to make sure that any efforts to extend the bootloader are done
upstream, and not in the TF-M-specific branch.
Are you expecting to be running the non-secure CPU before the secure
CPU has finished verifying the images?
David
Hi,
I've posted a design document for bootloader changes to support twin cpu at https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/w/tf_m/design/twin-cpu/bootloader/
Comments appreciated!
Thanks,
Chris
This message and any attachments may contain confidential information from Cypress or its subsidiaries. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message.
Hi,
I will update the wait object from 'event' to 'condition'. This is mainly for fixing the issue:
https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/T273
'event' is actually a depth 1 semaphore, which is not good enough for signals synching case.
Involve a simpler sync object 'condition' for signals (and client ACKs):
https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/trusted-firmware-m/+/712
Please help to check if you are interested in it.
Thanks
-Ken
Hi Alan,
Expected to be merged before end of Mar 13th if there is no more raised concern ;)
-Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of DeMars,
> Alan via TF-M
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 11:27 AM
> To: tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> Subject: Re: [TF-M] [EXTERNAL] Branches merging from 'feature-ipc' to 'master'
> is happening
>
> Yay! When?
>
> > On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:57 PM, Ken Liu (Arm Technology China) via TF-M <tf-
> m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi TF-M Subscribers,
> > The branch 'feature-ipc' is going to be merged into 'master', and here is the
> patch:
> > https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/trusted-firmware-m/+/677
> >
> > After the merging, the IPC feature will be available in the 'master' branch,
> future updates on the IPC part will happen in 'master' branch, too.
> > For those patches pushed towards 'feature-ipc' will be reviewed and we
> suggest push new patchset to 'master' branch.
> >
> > Please reply to this thread without hesitation if there are any questions.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Ken
> > --
> > TF-M mailing list
> > TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> > https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
> --
> TF-M mailing list
> TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
Yay! When?
> On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:57 PM, Ken Liu (Arm Technology China) via TF-M <tf-m(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote:
>
> Hi TF-M Subscribers,
> The branch 'feature-ipc' is going to be merged into 'master', and here is the patch:
> https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/trusted-firmware-m/+/677
>
> After the merging, the IPC feature will be available in the 'master' branch, future updates on the IPC part will happen in 'master' branch, too.
> For those patches pushed towards 'feature-ipc' will be reviewed and we suggest push new patchset to 'master' branch.
>
> Please reply to this thread without hesitation if there are any questions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Ken
> --
> TF-M mailing list
> TF-M(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org
> https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-m
Hi TF-M Subscribers,
The branch 'feature-ipc' is going to be merged into 'master', and here is the patch:
https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/trusted-firmware-m/+/677
After the merging, the IPC feature will be available in the 'master' branch, future updates on the IPC part will happen in 'master' branch, too.
For those patches pushed towards 'feature-ipc' will be reviewed and we suggest push new patchset to 'master' branch.
Please reply to this thread without hesitation if there are any questions.
Thanks.
-Ken