- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

Re: Linker errors with ENABLE_LTO and LD overriding

by Bollapalli, Maheedhar Sai

Hi, Adding further details: build command, error log and linker version. Build command : make -j12 CC=aarch64-none-elf-gcc LD=aarch64-none-elf-ld CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-elf- PLAT=zynqmp RESET_TO_BL31=1 DEBUG=1 ZYNQMP_CONSOLE=dtb bl31 Error Log: usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-elf/aarch64-xilinx-elf-ld.real: build/zynqmp/debug/bl31/bl31_entrypoint.o: in function `bl31_entrypoint': bl31/aarch64/bl31_entrypoint.S:79:(.text.asm.bl31_entrypoint+0x108): undefined reference to `bl31_setup' bl31/aarch64/bl31_entrypoint.S:93:(.text.asm.bl31_entrypoint+0x10c): undefined reference to `bl31_main' build/zynqmp/debug/bl31/cpu_data.o: in function `_cpu_data_by_index': lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/cpu_data.S:44:(.text.asm._cpu_data_by_index+0x8): undefined reference to `percpu_data' usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-elf/aarch64-xilinx-elf-ld.real: lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/cpu_data.S:45:(.text.asm._cpu_data_by_index+0xc): undefined reference to `percpu_data' usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-elf/aarch64-xilinx-elf-ld.real: build/zynqmp/debug/bl31/context.o: in function `el3_exit': arm-trusted-firmware$ aarch64-none-elf-ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.42.0.20240620 arm-trusted-firmware$ aarch64-none-elf-gcc --version aarch64-xilinx-elf-gcc.real (GCC) 13.3.0 Regards, Maheedhar.

9 months, 4 weeks

3
4
0 0

Erratum 1530924 handling

by Bollapalli, Maheedhar Sai

Hi, On AMD-Xilinx ZynqMP platform there is a erratum (1530924) which is mentioned as applied as shown in the log below: " INFO: BL31: cortex_a53: CPU workaround for erratum 1530924 was applied " Refer to the code comments mentioned below, there is no "erratum has no workaround in the CPU. Generic code must take care " https://gitenterprise.xilinx.com/Linux/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/lib… However, we found no handling in the generic code either. Can we be guided further regarding the handling of erratum 1530924 ? Regards, Maheedhar.

10 months

2
2
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Dec 26, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Dec 26, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests

by Nagal, Amit

Hi , I am referring to the code coverage as below : https://ci-builds.trustedfirmware.org/static-files/htxSEy4sEOQXtuGetFtzHqAm… I see a lot of files from non plat code getting covered with code coverage . can somebody help me with further information : 1. Where are cputests related unit test scripts hosted for non plat files like bl31_main.c ? 2. can we use the unit test & code coverage infra for other platforms say AMD-Xilinx? 3. How is the code coverage achieved for assembly .S files like bl31_entrypoint.S ? Regards Amit From: Nagal, Amit Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 1:23 PM To: Gyorgy Szing <Gyorgy.Szing(a)arm.com>; Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; Joanna Farley <Joanna.Farley(a)arm.com> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi Everyone, I see very limited number of unit tests cpp files hosted at https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-A/tf-a-unit-tests/+/refs… Do we have more unit tests implemented for TF-A and available publicly anywhere ? Regards Amit From: Gyorgy Szing <Gyorgy.Szing(a)arm.com<mailto:Gyorgy.Szing@arm.com>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 2:44 PM To: Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>; Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>; Joanna Farley <Joanna.Farley(a)arm.com<mailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com>> Subject: Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi Amit, “can this be utilized to perform unit testing for platforms other than fvp” Unit-tests executables are running on the “build host” which often is the X86 based PC of the developer (or a CI worker). UT is favoring low cost and sacrificing some level of test correctness. It assumes the compiled C code is fully portable and works the same on all platforms. Moreover, it focuses on C function correctness, and checks if a specific function works as designed. Verifying higher level operation is out of scope (e.g. function implements any feature correctly or is behaving correctly when called by other functions in the system). In turn the complexity of embedded development is removed (managing the target, updating the firmware, using a JTAG interface for debugging, etc…), and the resource constraints of the embedded target is not present. The code coverage executed on the fvp platform is a system test, it exercises the product on an emulated target. It verifies the correctness of the code as it executes like it will in a real-world scenario. This is a higher value test, but it is much more expensive in terms of time and complexity than UT. “Is c-picker tool available inside arm still as of now ?” No, it is public, although it is a bit hidden. It lives on the c-picker branch to the Trusted Services repository (see [1) Similarly, Firmware Test Builder lives on the fwtb branch (see 2). This branch is independent of TS code and contains only the two tools. We have plans to move each to dedicated repositories, but I don’t know when I will have the time to do this. (FWTB and c-picker was developed by my team (TS) and is used and maintained by both projects. Before the TS project was started, we were working on TF-A. I can help with the tools, but I am not familiar to TF-A specifics like, how the tools are integrated to TF-A or which parts of TF-A are covered by UT cases.) 1: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TS/trusted-services/+/re… 2: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TS/trusted-services/+/re… /George On 2024-11-20, 06:05, "Nagal, Amit via TF-A-Tests" <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> wrote: Hi Mark, From unit test prospective , I saw this document https://www.trustedfirmware.org/docs/TF-A-UnitLevelTesting.pdf. can this be utilized to perform unit testing for platforms other than fvp ? Is c-picker tool available inside arm still as of now ? Regards Amit From: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 9:20 PM To: Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>; Joanna Farley <Joanna.Farley(a)arm.com<mailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com>> Subject: Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Amit, It appears I was incorrect in getting coverage outside of the flows we have internally. I apologize for the confusion... Mark ________________________________ From: Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2024 12:07 AM To: Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>>; Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>>; Joanna Farley <Joanna.Farley(a)arm.com<mailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com<mailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com%3cmailto:Joanna.Farley@arm.com>>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi @Mark Dykes<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com> , Can you please share insights about how to get coverage information using manual tests run for FVP platform . That will help us to atleast get the coverage information for non platform code ( we are interested for bl31) . Regards Amit From: Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 12:23 AM To: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>; joanna.farley(a)arm.com<mailto:joanna.farley@arm.com<mailto:joanna.farley@arm.com%3cmailto:joanna.farley@arm.com>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Thank you Joanna and Mark, for your insights and response. I wasn’t aware that these tests are running on a Virtual Platform and that’s how the coverage is being measured. I’ll look into this further, decide how we want to integrate it into our project, and get back to you. I appreciate your help and support here. Best regards, Senthil From: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 9:03 AM To: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. Senthil, I do have a way to get coverage for manual test runs using FVP if that helps. I can assist if needed…. Mark From: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 12:53 AM To: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi Senthil, * Is there a way to get code coverage for manual test runs? Sorry, I'm not aware of such capability. As you say code coverage implies use of CI scripting that isn't possible to reproduce locally out of the box (afaik). Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan via TF-A-Tests <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>> Sent: 26 August 2024 23:58 To: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: [Tf-a-tests] Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi Mark and Oliver, A gentle reminder on the below request. Thanks, Senthil From: Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 3:44 PM To: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>; Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> Cc: Jain, Ronak <ronak.jain(a)amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com<mailto:ronak.jain@amd.com%3cmailto:ronak.jain@amd.com>>>; Nagal, Amit <amit.nagal(a)amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com<mailto:amit.nagal@amd.com%3cmailto:amit.nagal@amd.com>>>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek(a)amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com<mailto:michal.simek@amd.com%3cmailto:michal.simek@amd.com>>> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Thanks a lot Mark and Oliver for your inputs and pointers. All of these seem to be more closely integrated with the CI/CD builds. Is there a way to get code coverage for manual test runs? Specifically, I'm looking to get coverage results after loading and executing all the tests from a developer build (e.g., using a binary like tftf.bin). Best regards, Senthil From: Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 3:16 PM To: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>>> Subject: RE: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. All, This link is more current. The overall coverage numbers are not being reported due to an issue that is being worked on now. However you can see the individual coverage metrics if you click on a particular config where is says "success". The next page will have the link "Build Artifacts" at the top and so click that to the next where you will see the directory "trace_report". Click this and you will see a list of contents one of which should be index.html. If you click this you will see the individual coverage report for that config(test). tf-a-ci-coverage-gateway #72 [Jenkins] (trustedfirmware.org)<https://ci.trustedfirmware.org/job/tf-a-ci-coverage-gateway/72/> Let me know if you have questions... Mark From: Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez(a)arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com<mailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com%3cmailto:Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 2:27 AM To: tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>>; Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan <SenthilNathan.Thangaraj(a)amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com<mailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com%3cmailto:SenthilNathan.Thangaraj@amd.com>>>>; Mark Dykes <Mark.Dykes(a)arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com%3cmailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com>>>> Subject: Re: Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Hi, You can refer to this job showing code coverage results aggregation from multiple test configurations: https://ci.trustedfirmware.org/job/tf-a-ci-coverage-gateway/67/ https://ci-builds.trustedfirmware.org/static-files/IK1tucCNXFdhS4AAQth8N7zW… I don't think there is a test level granularity. @Mark Dykes<mailto:Mark.Dykes@arm.com> may know better. Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan via TF-A-Tests <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>>> Sent: 20 August 2024 08:40 To: tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>> <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>>> Subject: [Tf-a-tests] Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests Dear TF-A team, I have a query regarding the TF-A test. Specifically, I would like to know if there is a method to find out the code coverage for a specific test or for all the tests in current run? Your direction in this regard will be really appreciated. Thank you, Senthil -- TF-A-Tests mailing list -- tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>> To unsubscribe send an email to tf-a-tests-leave(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>> -- TF-A-Tests mailing list -- tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> To unsubscribe send an email to tf-a-tests-leave(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org%3cmailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> -- TF-A-Tests mailing list -- tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests@lists.trustedfirmware.org> To unsubscribe send an email to tf-a-tests-leave(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a-tests-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org>

10 months, 2 weeks

2
4
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Dec 12, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling as no topic proposed. Regards, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Dec 12, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

10 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Unable to merge gerrit#33536

by Amarinder Singh Sethi (QUIC)

Hi, I recently uploaded the patch (https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33536) to add qti platform support for qcs615. The patch is fully isolated and doesn't touch any common code and doesn't get included in any other platform compilation. On enabling basic CI, I see some failures which are unrelated to my patch. I wonder what the next step should be. If somebody can help me, it will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Amarinder

10 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.26 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.26 is now available. This release contains the following patches: a449c1360 build(npm): bump word-wrap from 1.2.3 to 1.2.4 [1] ceb400895 build(npm): update Node.js and all packages [2] 0abe5d571 build(deps): bump braces [3] 3de9d3abd chore(deps): bump micromatch [4] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I9a383e6d6ae907858028980eadccfa2070f42… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/[1, "always", "Change-Id:"], /* Warning */ [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I7e2a543a3bc67d426a69fc25f93b878c9b5a3… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I783a6838616c570a41a5a0f58db3e6430c43c… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.26/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.10 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.10 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 3ea256c36 build(deps): bump pip from 23.1.2 to 23.3 [1] f8a06a0f8 build(deps): bump urllib3 from 2.0.2 to 2.2.2 [2] 93ad43e79 build(deps): bump jinja2 from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 [3] ebf6430a0 build(deps): bump idna from 3.4 to 3.7 [4] c5d2a030a build(deps): bump braces [5] 6c6e986bf build(npm): update Node.js and all packages [6] 395ef3534 chore(deps): bump micromatch [7] c9f3fb582 build(deps): bump setuptools in the pip group across 1 directory [8] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I40b0219fe5e6797fc2a2534d8ea8c9480af36… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I4f3a1ffe0cf374f433ac59b20b7d60ee77009… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I69248b2c17f8edfe7dfd27952aae688e7d424… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I78f5052e20572d92f1bc21213bb29b5549f34… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I7e2a543a3bc67d426a69fc25f93b878c9b5a3… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/[1, "always", "Change-Id:"], /* Warning */ [7] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I783a6838616c570a41a5a0f58db3e6430c43c… [8] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ibd4e4730bfc5cce8d85ec55021983d6f748ff… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.10/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Firmware-A v2.12 release follow up - shrinkwrap

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, As a follow up to the Firmware-A v2.12 release [1], we are pleased to share the shrinkwrap tool [2] configurations have been updated to consume latest firmware/upstream ingredients using following tags: TF-A: v2.12.0 TF-a-tests: v2.12.0 Hafnium: v2.12.0 TF-RMM: tf-rmm-v0.6.0 CCA EDK2: 3223_arm_cca_rmm_v1.0_rel0_v3 linux: cca-full/v5+v7 kvmtool: cca/v3 An additional merge request is in queue for kvm-unit-tests update to cca/rmm-v1.0-rel0 tag. Shrinkwrap is a convenient tool for building a fully integrated Arm CCA SW stack running on the Base AEM FVP platform. In particular this is the tool of choice for RMM development to reproduce a 3 or 4 worlds RME based environment. Regards, Olivier. [1] https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/list/tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.… [2] https://shrinkwrap.docs.arm.com/en/latest/

11 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Interaction with TF-a from NS World

by Tamas Ban

Hi Max, > Can we say this presentation (2022) is there and ready to use? Yes, there are multiple measured boot and attestation schemes are implemented in TF-A and Trusted Services. What to use is depends on your use case and your system capability: - A class core only - A+M system where the M core is in a secure enclave > By the way, you mentioned that attestation is not handled in TF-a (EL3), but the below EL3 handler handles it (RMM_ATTEST_GET_PLAT_TOKEN). Does it just send the request to the "Trusted Service" you were referencing? No, they are different. The available options/schemes: * -If you have a single A class core and you want something similar to psa_initial_attest_get_token() then read this: https://trusted-services.readthedocs.io/en/latest/services/attest-service-d… Here the token is created by a secure service running in SEL0/1. EL3 only responsible for making the world switch (S<->NS). This is callable from Linux user space, with the libs and kernel driver pointed out by George. * What you mentioned above (RMM_ATTEST_GET_PLAT_TOKEN) is basically the CCA attestation scheme, where there are two halves tokens. It is targeting the RME capable systems which otherwise have A+M cores. One half of the token is produced by the M class secure enclave(HES) the other half by the RMM running in REL2 on the A core. There is a hash link between the half tokens. Please elaborate your use case then I can help more! Regards, Tamas From: Gyorgy Szing <Gyorgy.Szing(a)arm.com> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 11:43 AM To: Max Adam <maxadamcamb(a)gmail.com>; Tamas Ban <Tamas.Ban(a)arm.com> Subject: Re: [TF-A] Interaction with TF-a from NS World Hi, "By the way, you mentioned that attestation is not handled in TF-a (EL3)," Sorry, my bad. Since you mentioned PSA I got the impression you are after PSA Initial Attestation, and that is out of scope for TF-A. Tamas: Can you please respond to the RMM related attestation question? /George On 2024-12-02, 11:38, "Max Adam" <maxadamcamb(a)gmail.com<mailto:maxadamcamb@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Gyorgy, Thank you for the detailed comment. It is really helpful, especially this link seems good to chase: https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-arm/about/documentation/trusted-services.… Basically, I was following this link from @Tamas.ban@arm.com<mailto:Tamas.ban@arm.com>; "CCA attestation and measured both" https://www.trustedfirmware.org/docs/Attestation_and_Measured_Boot.pdf Can we say this presentation (2022) is there and ready to use? By the way, you mentioned that attestation is not handled in TF-a (EL3), but the below EL3 handler handles it (RMM_ATTEST_GET_PLAT_TOKEN). Does it just send the request to the "Trusted Service" you were referencing? Error! Filename not specified. Gyorgy Szing <Gyorgy.Szing(a)arm.com<mailto:Gyorgy.Szing@arm.com>>, 2 Ara 2024 Pzt, 09:29 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Hi Max, Please check this picture [1]. It shows the exception levels on an aarch64 platforms, and typical components executing at each exception level. TF-A is a Secure Monitor implementation. It is the most privileged component, and its main goal is to route calls between the NWd and SWd. Each call to SWd must go through this component. E.g. if an "aarch64 App" wishes to use a service provided by a Trusted Service, a call has to be made into EL1 (e.g. Linux Kernel), then if a Hypervisor is present to EL2, then to the Monitor at EL3 (TF-A), then to optional S-EL2 (e.g. Hafnium), S-EL1 (e.g. OP_TEE) and finally to S-EL0. TF-A does not implement the PSA APIs. OP-TEE is a Trusted OS, and a reference implementation of the Global Platforms standards [2]. PSA is not part of GP, and AFAIK there is no TA implementing PSA APIs. The PSA reference implementation for Cortex-A is developed in the Trusted Services project. The project implements all services required for PSA certification (Crypto, ITS, PS, Attestation) plus a few non-psa ones like Firmware Update Service or UEFI Variable service. We developed a Linux kernel driver called tstee (up-stream since v6.10) , and two shared libraries which can be used by linux user-space applications to access the services. Libts implements service discovery and the TS RPC components, and "libtspsa" carries easy to use PSA client implementations (basically the C PSA API). Trusted Services follows the Firmware Framework for A-Profile standard (FF-A) which defines a protocol to be used between exception levels and a runtime model. PSA services are deployed to S-EL0 Secure Partitions and need a Secure Partition Manager implementation executing at a higher exception levels. The reference SPMD implementation is part of the TF-A project, the S-EL2 reference SPMC is Hafnium [5], and the S-EL1 reference implementation is OP-TEE SPMC [6]. (Only one SPMC implementation can be present on a system.) A major difference between the Cortex-M and the Cortex-A ecosystem is the level of diversity. While a Cortex-M stack is typically implemented using components from one or maximum a few stakeholders, a Cortex-A stack is built from components owned by a vast set of owners. As a result, integration of a Cortex-A software stack is much more complex. There are multiple integration systems targeting the problem like Buildroot and Yocto. Trusted Services supports two integration systems currently. The OP-TEE integration system, which is a gnumake and Buildroot based solution (see [7]) and Yocto where the meta-arm layer [8] hosts TS recipes. Please find some TS specific meta-arm documentation here: [9] For more help and information, about PSA on Cortex-A and TS feel free to drop an email to the TS mailing list [10], and/or to me. /George 1: https://documentation-service.arm.com/static/63a065c41d698c4dc521cb1b 2: https://globalplatform.org/about-globalplatform/ 3: https://trusted-services.readthedocs.io/en/stable/overview/index.html 4: https://developer.arm.com/architectures/Firmware%20Framework%20for%20A-Prof… 5: https://hafnium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/secure-partition-manager/index.html 6: https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/architecture/spmc.html 7: https://github.com/OP-TEE/build 8: https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-arm 9: https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-arm/about/documentation/trusted-services.… 10: https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/mailman3/lists/trusted-services.lists.tru… On 2024-12-01, 21:14, "Max Adam via TF-A" <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> wrote: Hello All, I am coming from the TF-m domain, and now I am struggling with TF-a as I am not a Linux expert. I am just looking for the interactions with TF-a, such as getting psa attestation token etc. How can I find example these interactions from NS World (Linux) or lower privilege Secure World Executions such as OP-TEE or OP-TEE TAs? I suppose there shall be drivers and APIs provided by TF-a? Thanks Max

11 months

3
3
0 0

Interaction with TF-a from NS World

by Max Adam

Hello All, I am coming from the TF-m domain, and now I am struggling with TF-a as I am not a Linux expert. I am just looking for the interactions with TF-a, such as getting psa attestation token etc. How can I find example these interactions from NS World (Linux) or lower privilege Secure World Executions such as OP-TEE or OP-TEE TAs? I suppose there shall be drivers and APIs provided by TF-a? Thanks Max

11 months

2
1
0 0

Addition of mbedTLS as a submodule dependency to TF-A-Tests

by Soby Mathew

Hi Everyone, In order to facilitate development for Device Assignment tests for RME-DA, we have added MbedTLS repo as a submodule dependency to tf-a-tests. The merge commit can be found here : https://review.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-A/tf-a-tests/+/3e72cd… The patch is done in such a way that existing build of TF-A-Tests or Test run is not affected due to the additional dependency. Only tests which depend on MbedTLS will be affected in that they will either be skipped or fail at runtime due to the missing dependency. Also, the change allows to use the config `MBEDTLS_DIR` to point to a MbedTLS directory outside the tf-a-tests source tree. This aligns with the TF-A mechanism for MbedTLS dependancy in case the submodule mechanism is not preferred. We expect existing CI and testing infrastructure to be unaffected by this change. Please let us know if you have any comments. Best Regards Soby Mathew

11 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.25 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.25 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 3e1ecab9a build(deps): bump pip from 23.1.2 to 23.3 [1] 73421e1df build(deps): bump urllib3 from 2.0.2 to 2.2.2 [2] b607e5481 build(deps): bump jinja2 from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 [3] 720d7ea22 build(deps): bump idna from 3.4 to 3.7 [4] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I40b0219fe5e6797fc2a2534d8ea8c9480af36… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I4f3a1ffe0cf374f433ac59b20b7d60ee77009… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I69248b2c17f8edfe7dfd27952aae688e7d424… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I78f5052e20572d92f1bc21213bb29b5549f34… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.25/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

11 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Nov 28, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Nov 28, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware v2.12 release announcement

by Olivier Deprez

Hi All, We are pleased to announce the formal release of Trusted Firmware-A version 2.12 bundle of project deliverables. This includes Trusted Firmware-A, Trusted Firmware-A Tests, Hafnium, RMM, Trusted Services, and TF-A OpenCI scripts/jobs components. These went live on Nov, 21st 2024. Please find references to tags and change logs at the end of this email. Many thanks to the trustedfirmware.org community for the active engagement in delivering this release! Notable features of the release version 2.12 are as follows: TF-A/EL3 * New CPUs support: Cortex-A320 (Arcadia), Cortex-A720AE. * Arch extensions: : FEAT_THE, FEAT_LS64_ACCDATA, FEAT_Debugv8p9, FEAT_SCTLR2, FEAT_FGT2 ; Arm 9.4 : FEAT_D128 support. * Context management: Asymmetric CPU features, EL3 execution context, SVE S/R support. * RME: GPT contiguous descriptor (or GPT large mappings support). * Arm CCA: added attestation generic library, el3 attestation token signing support. Boot flow * Tools: * Introduced the Transfer List Compiler (TLC) Host Tool supporting the FW hand-off specification. * Introduced CoT Device Tree to C File (DT2C) tool. * mbedTLS Improvements: * Resolved random authentication failures with ECDSA. * Enhanced mbedTLS configuration selection. * Maximize usage of mbedTLS library APIs in TF-A. * Upgraded to mbedTLS v3.6.1. * Feature addition/support: * Support for the ECDSA P-384 curve with the PSA Crypto implementation. * Documentation: * Added the DPE Design and Threat Model document to TF-A readthedocs. Errata (CPU/GIC) * Cortex-A720, Cortex-A520, Cortex-X4 errata. TF-A platforms support * New platforms added: TC4, RD-1 AE, RK3566/RK3568. * Platform fixes: FPGA, FVP, Neoverse-RD, TC, Corstone-1000, Allwinner, AST2700, Poplar, Agilex, A3K, MT8188, iMX8M, S32G274A, qemu, Rpi3, Rockchip, STM32MP1, STM32MP2, Versal, ZynqMP. Hafnium/SPM (S-EL2) * FF-A features additions * FF-A v1.2 FFA_MSG_WAIT RX buffer ownership flag. * FF-A v1.2 FFA_VERSION endpoint restriction. * FF-A v1.1 VM availability messages. * Architectural support * vCPU IPI signaling. * Arch timer virtualization. * RME: GPF support and memcpy hardening. * Secure Interrupt Handling for UP S-EL1 partitions. TF-RMM (R-EL2) * REL0 RMM 1.0 support. * Support for alternative attestation token signing via EL3. * Various improvements and bugfixes as listed in the change log. TF-A Tests * Arm arch. extensions: AMU, FEAT_FGT2, LS64_ACCDATA, FEAT_Debugv8p9, LS64 64-byte load/store. * Asymmetric feature testing (FEAT_SPE, FEAT_TRBE, FEAT_TCR2). * EL1 and EL2 context switch tests. * FF-A: v1.2 support, S-EL2 arch timer virtualization, S-EL2+RME hardening, EL3 SPMC TFTF test suite, EL3 SVE test coverage. * RME: RMM v1.0 testing support, PCIe DOE support, RMI support for FEAT_LPA2, SIMD, PAuth. * Platforms: AMD Versal Gen 2 added, Neoverse-RD refactoring, FVP PCIe support. Release tags across repositories: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/r… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-A/tf-a-tests/+/refs/tags… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/ci/tf-a-ci-scripts/+/refs/t… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/ci/tf-a-job-configs/+/refs/… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/hafnium/hafnium/+/refs/tags… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/ci/hafnium-ci-scripts/+/ref… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/ci/hafnium-job-configs/+/re… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-RMM/tf-rmm/+/refs/tags/t… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TS/trusted-services/+/refs/… Change logs: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/v2.12.0/change-log.html#id1 https://trustedfirmware-a-tests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/change-log.html#ve… https://hafnium.readthedocs.io/en/v2.12.0/change-log.html#v2-12 https://tf-rmm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/change-log.html#v0-6-0 Regards, Olivier.

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Changelog for v2.12 Release

by Govindraj Raja

Hello Everyone, Please take a look at the changelog for your respective platforms ahead of the TF-A v2.12 release. The changelog is autogenerated from the commit messages of the patches that have been merged since the v2.11 release. Here's your chance to give us guidance on any small manual adjustments you would like to see. Patch: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33483 Rendered Version: https://ci-builds.trustedfirmware.org/static-files/pAvWwn44kBOyAVI04_7T9WjV… -- Thanks, Govindraj R

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Nov 14, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Nov 14, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Firmware-A v2.12 release code freeze notification

by Govindraj Raja

Hi All, The next release of the Firmware-A bundle of projects tagged v2.12 has an expected code freeze date of Nov, 8th 2024. Refer to the release cadence section from TF-A documentation (https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/release-informatio…). Closing out the release takes around 6-10 working days after the code freeze. v2.12 release preparation tasks start from now. We want to ensure that planned feature patches for the release are submitted in good time for the review process to conclude. As a kind recommendation and a matter of sharing CI resources, please launch CI jobs with care e.g.: -For simple platform, docs changes, or one liners, use Allow-CI+1 label (no need for a full Allow-CI+2 run). -For large patch stacks use Allow-CI+2 at top of the patch stack (and if required few individual Allow+CI+1 labels in the middle of the patch stack). -Carefully analyze results and fix the change if required, before launching new jobs on the same change. -If after issuing a Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label a Build start notice is not added as a gerrit comment on the patch right away please be patient as under heavy load CI jobs can be queued and in extreme conditions it can be over an hour before the Build start notice is issued. Issuing another Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label will just result in an additional job being queued. -- Thanks, Govindraj R

11 months, 3 weeks

1
1
0 0

Reference Secure Partition Code with FF-A

by Belsare, Akshay

Hello everyone, I'm seeking a reference code for a Standalone Secure Partition using FF-A. Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! TIA, Akshay

11 months, 4 weeks

3
2
0 0

TF-A: Compilation issues for Rockchip platforms

by Quentin Schulz

Hi all, I've sent a few patches for fixing some compilation warnings or issues on Rockchip platforms [1][2][3][4][5] but I'm left with a few still... [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33080 [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33081 [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33082 [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33083 [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/33084 1) RK3588 symbol redefinition in assembly ======================================================================== commit fc3b98b2124c2b773322da0201e9ad7a697e6323 Author: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz(a)cherry.de> Date: Mon Oct 28 12:40:18 2024 +0100 fix(rk3588): pmu: fix assembly symbol redefinition Somehow cpus_pd_req_enter_wfi() gets called multiple times and clang isn't happy about redefining the same label multiple times (it is an inline function). An option could be to force the code to not be inlined (with __attribute__((noinline))) as removing the explicit inline still made the compiler inline the code. Recreate the while loop without a label to fix the clang build issue: plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c:763:7: error: symbol 'wfi_loop' is already defined 763 | "wfi_loop:\n" | ^ <inline asm>:5:1: note: instantiated into assembly here 5 | wfi_loop: | ^ Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz(a)cherry.de> Change-Id: Ie9f55135b2f95a78deb7cbb94f9a62d3ba61e808 diff --git a/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c b/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c index f693dbdf0..f05d3e58f 100644 --- a/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c +++ b/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c @@ -760,10 +760,10 @@ static inline void cpus_pd_req_enter_wfi(void) "mrs x0, S3_0_C15_C2_7\n" "orr x0, x0, #0x1\n" "msr S3_0_C15_C2_7, x0\n" - "wfi_loop:\n" + "ldr x0, .+4\n" "isb\n" "wfi\n" - "b wfi_loop\n"); + "br x0\n"); } static void nonboot_cpus_off(void) ========================================================================= This only happens for clang and I'm a bit confused as to why. Applying the above patch fixing that issue but inspecting the assembly code reveals something really odd. **With** that patch, with gcc: 25c8c: d510149f msr dbgprcr_el1, xzr 25c90: d538f2e0 mrs x0, s3_0_c15_c2_7 25c94: b2400000 orr x0, x0, #0x1 25c98: d518f2e0 msr s3_0_c15_c2_7, x0 25c9c: 58000020 ldr x0, 0x25ca0 25ca0: d5033fdf isb 25ca4: d503207f wfi 25ca8: d61f0000 br x0 **with** that patch, with clang: 26d2c: d510149f msr dbgprcr_el1, xzr 26d30: d538f2e0 mrs x0, s3_0_c15_c2_7 26d34: b2400000 orr x0, x0, #0x1 26d38: d518f2e0 msr s3_0_c15_c2_7, x0 26d3c: 58000020 ldr x0, 0x26d40 <--- "my" ldr 26d40: d5033fdf isb 26d44: d503207f wfi 26d48: d61f0000 br x0 <--- "my" br 26d4c: 94000e76 bl 0x2a724 26d50: d510149f msr dbgprcr_el1, xzr 26d54: d538f2e0 mrs x0, s3_0_c15_c2_7 26d58: b2400000 orr x0, x0, #0x1 26d5c: d518f2e0 msr s3_0_c15_c2_7, x0 26d60: 58000020 ldr x0, 0x26d64 <--- "my" ldr 26d64: d5033fdf isb 26d68: d503207f wfi 26d6c: d61f0000 br x0 <--- "my" br So I think the above patch is just a band-aid on what the actually is but I have no idea what could be going on. If I use this patch instead, to match the other assembly instructions in this file ========================================================================= diff --git a/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c b/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c index f693dbdf0..a4128b214 100644 --- a/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c +++ b/plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/pmu/pmu.c @@ -760,10 +760,10 @@ static inline void cpus_pd_req_enter_wfi(void) "mrs x0, S3_0_C15_C2_7\n" "orr x0, x0, #0x1\n" "msr S3_0_C15_C2_7, x0\n" - "wfi_loop:\n" + "1:\n" "isb\n" "wfi\n" - "b wfi_loop\n"); + "b 1b\n"); } static void nonboot_cpus_off(void) ========================================================================= It happily compiles, though the binary still seems to contain this loop twice. Using __attribute__((noinline)) the code is not duplicated, but I assume this is expected as it would now simply be a function. 2) RK3399 warning array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile unsigned int[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" In file included from src/dram.c:12: src/dram.c: In function 'm0_main': include/rk3399_mcu.h:15:34: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile unsigned int[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 15 | (*(volatile unsigned int *)(c)); __v; }) | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/rk3399_mcu.h:16:69: note: in definition of macro 'mmio_write_32' 16 | #define mmio_write_32(c, v) ((*(volatile unsigned int *)(c)) = (v)) | ^ src/dram.c:67:23: note: in expansion of macro 'mmio_read_32' 67 | mmio_read_32(PARAM_ADDR + PARAM_FREQ_SELECT)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: note: source object is likely at address zero In function 'ddr_set_pll', inlined from 'm0_main' at src/dram.c:71:2: include/rk3399_mcu.h:14:40: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile unsigned int[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 14 | #define mmio_read_32(c) ({unsigned int __v = \ | ^~~ include/rk3399_mcu.h:16:69: note: in definition of macro 'mmio_write_32' 16 | #define mmio_write_32(c, v) ((*(volatile unsigned int *)(c)) = (v)) | ^ src/dram.c:47:23: note: in expansion of macro 'mmio_read_32' 47 | mmio_read_32(PARAM_ADDR + PARAM_DPLL_CON0)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In function 'm0_main': cc1: note: source object is likely at address zero In function 'ddr_set_pll', inlined from 'm0_main' at src/dram.c:71:2: include/rk3399_mcu.h:14:40: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile unsigned int[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 14 | #define mmio_read_32(c) ({unsigned int __v = \ | ^~~ include/rk3399_mcu.h:16:69: note: in definition of macro 'mmio_write_32' 16 | #define mmio_write_32(c, v) ((*(volatile unsigned int *)(c)) = (v)) | ^ src/dram.c:49:23: note: in expansion of macro 'mmio_read_32' 49 | mmio_read_32(PARAM_ADDR + PARAM_DPLL_CON1)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In function 'm0_main': cc1: note: source object is likely at address zero include/rk3399_mcu.h:16:35: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile unsigned int[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 16 | #define mmio_write_32(c, v) ((*(volatile unsigned int *)(c)) = (v)) | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ src/dram.c:80:9: note: in expansion of macro 'mmio_write_32' 80 | mmio_write_32(PARAM_ADDR + PARAM_M0_DONE, M0_DONE_FLAG); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: note: source object is likely at address zero """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" This function is used in many places, but only in very specific places is it triggering a warning, when PARAM_ADDR is used, but only when accessed from m0 C files. PARAM_ADDR is set to 0xc0. From !m0 files, access to PARAM_ADDR seems to be done through the M0_PARAM_ADDR which is M0_BINCODE_BASE + PARAM_ADDR. For m0 files, it's directly accessing PARAM_ADDR. I honestly don't really know why it's complaining for m0 files but not the !m0 ones. 3) RK3399 expected string in '.incbin' directive This is only for clang. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" <instantiation>:6:10: error: expected string in '.incbin' directive .incbin /home/qschulz/work/upstream/trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3399/release/m0/rk3399m0.bin ^ plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S:20:1: note: while in macro instantiation INCBIN """/home/qschulz/work/upstream/trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3399/release/m0/rk3399m0.bin""", "rk3399m0_bin", ".sram.incbin" ^ <instantiation>:6:10: error: expected string in '.incbin' directive .incbin /home/qschulz/work/upstream/trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3399/release/m0/rk3399m0pmu.bin ^ plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S:21:1: note: while in macro instantiation INCBIN """/home/qschulz/work/upstream/trusted-firmware-a/build/rk3399/release/m0/rk3399m0pmu.bin""", "rk3399m0pmu_bin", ".pmusram.incbin" ^ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" With the following patch: ========================================================================= diff --git a/plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S b/plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S index 26f331317..ed70cba1f 100644 --- a/plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S +++ b/plat/rockchip/rk3399/drivers/pmu/pmu_fw.S @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ .type \sym, @object .align 4 \sym : - .incbin \file + .incbin "\file" .size \sym , .-\sym .global \sym\()_end \sym\()_end : ========================================================================= clang seems happy with that error but the linker triggers another one: ld.lld: warning: ignoring memory region assignment for non-allocatable section '.incbin_sram' ld.lld: error: section '.pmusram' will not fit in region 'PMUSRAM': overflowed by 3928 bytes Would appreciate some guidance there :) Cheers, Quentin

12 months

3
15
0 0

Re: TF-A: Compilation issues for Rockchip platforms

by Chris Kay

I’m afraid I’ve not been able to reproduce the .incbin error – it all links fine for me. $ clang --version Ubuntu clang version 18.1.3 (1ubuntu1) Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin

12 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 447712: Integer handling issues (NO_EFFECT) /plat/arm/board/fvp/fvp_pm.c: 332 in fvp_node_hw_state() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 447712: Integer handling issues (NO_EFFECT) /plat/arm/board/fvp/fvp_pm.c: 332 in fvp_node_hw_state() 326 int ret = 0; 327 328 /* 329 * The format of 'power_level' is implementation-defined, but 0 must 330 * mean a CPU. We also allow 1 to denote the cluster 331 */ >>> CID 447712: Integer handling issues (NO_EFFECT) >>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "power_level < 0ULL". 332 if ((power_level < ARM_PWR_LVL0) || (power_level > ARM_PWR_LVL1)) 333 return PSCI_E_INVALID_PARAMS; 334 335 /* 336 * Read the status of the given MPDIR from FVP power controller. The 337 * power controller only gives us on/off status, so map that to expected ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Oct 31, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Oct 31, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year

1
0
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum regular call

by Olivier Deprez

Dear TF-A ML members, As mentioned in https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/, trustedfirmware.org hosts regular technical calls on Thursdays. It mentions TF-A although in practise a number of Cortex-A projects beyond TF-A were discussed (refer to prior recordings on this page). Unfortunately this slot hasn't been very active recently. By this email I'm kindly emphasizing this forum is open to the community (and beyond trustedfirmware.org members) and you are welcome to propose topics. Presentations/slides are not strictly necessary, and we can also host informal discussions or session of questions. If you think of a topic, please reach to me and I'll be happy to accommodate. Thanks for your contributions in advance! Regards, Olivier.

1 year

1
0
0 0

How to configure TZC-400 in ATF?

by 钱非凡

I tried to add two new tzc regions in ATF's source code, and test the memory access in the new region. ```cpp #define ARM_TZC_REGIONS_DEF \ {ARM_AP_TZC_DRAM1_BASE, ARM_EL3_TZC_DRAM1_END + ARM_L1_GPT_SIZE, TZC_REGION_S_RDWR, 0}, \ {ARM_NS_DRAM1_BASE, 0xA0000000-1, ARM_TZC_NS_DRAM_S_ACCESS, PLAT_ARM_TZC_NS_DEV_ACCESS}, \ {0xA0000000, 0xB0000000-1, ARM_TZC_NS_DRAM_S_ACCESS, PLAT_ARM_TZC_NS_DEV_ACCESS}, \ {0xB0000000, 0xC0000000-1, ARM_TZC_NS_DRAM_S_ACCESS, PLAT_ARM_TZC_NS_DEV_ACCESS}, \ {0xC0000000, ARM_NS_DRAM1_END, ARM_TZC_NS_DRAM_S_ACCESS, PLAT_ARM_TZC_NS_DEV_ACCESS}, \ {ARM_DRAM2_BASE, ARM_DRAM2_END, ARM_TZC_NS_DRAM_S_ACCESS, PLAT_ARM_TZC_NS_DEV_ACCESS} ``` But FVP throws some warnings: ``` Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: common_reset starts Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: build config register value 0x3003f08 4 filters, 9 regions, address width 64 Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.flashloader0: FlashLoader: Loaded 3164 kB from file '/home/bea1e/functionality-prototype/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/fvp/release/fip.bin' Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.secureflashloader: FlashLoader: Loaded 25 kB from file '/home/bea1e/functionality-prototype/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/fvp/release/bl1.bin' Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: common_reset starts Info: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: build config register value 0x3003f08 4 filters, 9 regions, address width 64 Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 220 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 224 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 228 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 22c In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 230 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 234 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5126760 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 240 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 244 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 248 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 24c In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 250 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns Warning: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.bp.tzc_400: attempt to write invalid address 254 In file: (unknown):0 In process: FVP_Base_RevC_2xAEMvA.thread_p_32 @ 5127800 ns ``` It seems the configuration registers for the two new regions are invalid. But I dont know how to solve this problem. Here are the arguments of FVP: ``` -C bp.ve_sysregs.exit_on_shutdown=1 \ -C cache_state_modelled=0 \ -C pctl.startup=0.0.0.0 \ -C cluster0.NUM_CORES=4 \ -C cluster1.NUM_CORES=4 \ -C bp.secure_memory=1 \ -C bp.dram_size=8 \ -C bp.tzc_400.diagnostics=1 \ -C bp.secureflashloader.fname=$(TF_A_PATH)/build/fvp/$(TF_A_BUILD)/bl1.bin \ -C bp.flashloader0.fname=$(TF_A_PATH)/build/fvp/$(TF_A_BUILD)/fip.bin \ -C bp.virtioblockdevice.image_path=$(BOOT_IMG) ``` Should I add more arguments while booting FVP? Is there any other advice for me to test the TZASC configurations?

1 year

2
1
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 447121: Incorrect expression (UNUSED_VALUE) /drivers/cadence/emmc/cdns_sdmmc.c: 434 in card_reset() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 447121: Incorrect expression (UNUSED_VALUE) /drivers/cadence/emmc/cdns_sdmmc.c: 434 in card_reset() 428 uint32_t reg_value = 0; 429 430 /* Reading SRS10 value before writing */ 431 reg_value = mmio_read_32(cdns_params.reg_base + SDHC_CDNS_SRS10); 432 433 if (power_enable == true) { >>> CID 447121: Incorrect expression (UNUSED_VALUE) >>> Assigning value "4294963455U" to "reg_value" here, but that stored value is overwritten before it can be used. 434 reg_value &= ~((7 << SDMMC_CDN_BVS) | (1 << SDMMC_CDN_BP)); 435 reg_value = ((1 << SDMMC_CDN_BVS) | (1 << SDMMC_CDN_BP)); 436 } else { 437 reg_value &= ~((7 << SDMMC_CDN_BVS) | (1 << SDMMC_CDN_BP)); 438 } 439 mmio_write_32(cdns_params.reg_base + SDHC_CDNS_SRS10, reg_value); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.9 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.9 is now available. This release contains the following patches: c4c6eae4e feat(cm): add errata 2938996, 2726228 [1] 33a04460d fix(cpus): modify the fix for Cortex-A75 erratum 764081 [2] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I53b037839820c8b3a869f393588302a365d5b… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ifda1f4cb32bdec9a9af29397ddc03bf22a7a8… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.9/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.24 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.24 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 10cd41d91 feat(cm): add errata 2938996, 2726228 [1] 578d3577f fix(cpus): modify the fix for Cortex-A75 erratum 764081 [2] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I53b037839820c8b3a869f393588302a365d5b… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ifda1f4cb32bdec9a9af29397ddc03bf22a7a8… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.24/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.8 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.8 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 9c723cd1a docs(prerequisites): update MbedTLS version to 3.6.1 [1] d3726fb42 refactor(mbedtls): remove hack in LIBMBEDTLS_CFLAGS [2] 34a4f2446 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 3076789 [3] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I1a68dfcb52a8361c1689cb6ef12d265a6462f… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I934adefbf2fed16e16b9d98bc8674125b70b0… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib100bfab91efdb6330fdcdac127bcc5732d59… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.8/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.23 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.23 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 89c138ae8 docs(prerequisites): update MbedTLS version to 3.6.1 [1] 625207291 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 3076789 [2] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I1a68dfcb52a8361c1689cb6ef12d265a6462f… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib100bfab91efdb6330fdcdac127bcc5732d59… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.23/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Oct 17, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Oct 17, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 445539: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /drivers/arm/dcc/dcc_console.c: 153 in console_dcc_register() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 445539: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /drivers/arm/dcc/dcc_console.c: 153 in console_dcc_register() 147 .flush = dcc_console_flush, 148 }, 149 }; 150 151 int console_dcc_register(console_t *console) 152 { >>> CID 445539: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) >>> A write to an aggregate overwrites a const-qualified field within the aggregate. 153 memcpy(console, &dcc_console.console, sizeof(console_t)); 154 return console_register(console); 155 } 156 157 void console_dcc_unregister(console_t *console) 158 { 159 dcc_console_flush(console); 160 (void)console_unregister(console); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Kernel source for RAS error injection on neoverse reference design platform

by Nagal, Amit

Hi, I am referring to https://neoverse-reference-design.docs.arm.com/en/latest/features/ras/ras.h… for RAS error injection on neoverse reference design platform. I am referring to below steps : mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug # Step needed for Buildroot only echo 0x80020000 > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/error_type echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/oem-einj/sel-firmware-first echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/oem-einj/sel-component echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/oem-einj/sel-error-type echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/error_inject I want to refer to kernel source driver which exposes attributes : sel-firmware-first , sel-component , sel-error-type. Also that driver must be doing the actual injections and registering sdei events with EL3 . can I be advised where to look in for kernel sources ? Regards Amit

1 year

4
6
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 2 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 2 of 2 defect(s) ** CID 445362: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) /drivers/st/ddr/phy/phyinit/src/ddrphy_phyinit_c_initphyconfig.c: 95 in atxslewrate_program() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 445362: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) /drivers/st/ddr/phy/phyinit/src/ddrphy_phyinit_c_initphyconfig.c: 95 in atxslewrate_program() 89 uint32_t atxpredrvmode; 90 uint32_t c_addr; 91 uint16_t atxslewrate; 92 93 c_addr = anib << 12; 94 >>> CID 445362: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>> Using uninitialized value "ck_anib_inst[0]". 95 if ((anib == ck_anib_inst[0]) || (anib == ck_anib_inst[1])) { 96 /* CK ANIB instance */ 97 #if STM32MP_DDR3_TYPE || STM32MP_DDR4_TYPE 98 atxpredrvmode = 0x0U; 99 #else /* STM32MP_LPDDR4_TYPE */ 100 atxpredrvmode = 0x1U; ** CID 445361: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /drivers/st/ddr/phy/phyinit/src/ddrphy_phyinit_c_initphyconfig.c: 1021 in aforcetricont_acx4anibdis_program() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 445361: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /drivers/st/ddr/phy/phyinit/src/ddrphy_phyinit_c_initphyconfig.c: 1021 in aforcetricont_acx4anibdis_program() 1015 #endif /* STM32MP_DDR3_TYPE || STM32MP_DDR4_TYPE */ 1016 1017 /* 1018 * If all the lanes can be disabled, and Anib is not the first or last disable 1019 * entire chiplet 1020 */ >>> CID 445361: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach the expression "anib != 0U" inside this statement: "if (aforcetricont == 15U &&...". 1021 if ((aforcetricont == 0xFU) && (anib != 0U) && 1022 (anib != (config->uib.numanib - 1U))) { 1023 acx4anibdis = acx4anibdis | (0x1U << anib); 1024 } 1025 mmio_write_16((uintptr_t)(DDRPHYC_BASE + (4U * (TANIB | c_addr | 1026 CSR_AFORCETRICONT_ADDR))), ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Introduction and Interest in Contributing to the TF-A Project

by omar elmasry

Dear TF-A Contributors, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Omar, and I am an Embedded Software Engineer at Valeo. I am excited to introduce myself to the Trusted Firmware-A community and look forward to contributing to the project. I have already enrolled in the mailing list and reviewed the documentation. I am passionate about technical deep dives and always eager to explore new areas. I am particularly interested in ARM-based projects, and I'm enthusiastic about getting involved with fellow geeks who share the same passion for cutting-edge technology. I would greatly appreciate any guidance on current tasks or areas where contributions are needed so I can start contributing effectively. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to collaborating with all of you! Best regards, Omar Embedded Software Engineer | Valeo (+20) 10 6962 8429

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.7 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.7 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 23b59a38b fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2897503 [1] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I3178a890b6f1307b310e817af75f8fdfb8668… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.7/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.22 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.22 is now available. This release contains the following patches: ac24f38b8 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2897503 [1] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I3178a890b6f1307b310e817af75f8fdfb8668… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.22/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: TF-A Tech Forum

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, Cancelling as no topic planned for today. Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings Sent: 24 July 2024 17:36 To: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings <linaro.org_havjv2figrh5egaiurb229pd8c(a)group.calendar.google.com>; marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com <marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com>; okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com <okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: TF-A Tech Forum When: 03 October 2024 17:00-18:00. Where: This event has been updated We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trustedfirmware.org%2Fmeetin…> Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvd…<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro-org.zoom.us%2Fmy%2Ftruste…> One tap mobile +16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York) +16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 915 970 4974 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…> When Every 2 weeks from 8am to 9am on Thursday (Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix) Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com<mailto:marek.bykowski@gmail.com> okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com<mailto:okash.khawaja@gmail.com> tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> View all guest info<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> RSVP for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> for all events in this series Yes<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> No<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> Maybe<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> More options<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> Invitation from Google Calendar<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/> You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more<https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>

1 year

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Oct 3, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Oct 3, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year

1
0
0 0

About the SDS usage model

by Deng Bob

Hi all, I am trying to raise a question about SDS. As you know, SDS (Shared data storage) is used to communicate or exhcange info among different processor units like AP, SCP, RSE, etc. So, do we need to add some lock mechanisms to protect the data when one processor entity is accessing it? After I reviewed the open source Trusted Firmware and SCP firmware it looks to me that both Trusted Firmware and SCP directly access the shared memory region without any limitation. Currently, it just uses the 'valid' flag to identify if the data is ready to use, is this good enough? Looking forwared to your response! Thank you!!! Best Regards, Bob

1 year, 1 month

2
2
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 445089: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /drivers/st/pmic/stpmic2.c: 251 in stpmic2_regulator_levels_mv() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 445089: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /drivers/st/pmic/stpmic2.c: 251 in stpmic2_regulator_levels_mv() 245 uint8_t id, const uint16_t **levels, 246 size_t *levels_count) 247 { 248 const struct regul_struct *regul = &regul_table[id]; 249 250 if (regul == NULL) { >>> CID 445089: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach this statement: "return -3;". 251 return RET_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS; 252 } 253 254 if (levels_count != NULL) { 255 *levels_count = regul->volt_table_size; 256 } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

TF-A EL3 SPMC upgrade to FF-A Spec v1.2

by Belsare, Akshay

Hi Marc, In TF-A, the FF-A version is currently set to v1.2, but I am unable to find the corresponding implementation for EL3 SPMC configuration. I'm particularly interested in the support for FF-A Notification Mechanism. Could you please provide the timeline for when this will be added to the TF-A EL3 SPMC configuration? Thank You! Akshay Belsare

1 year, 1 month

2
2
0 0

PSA calls with RSE comms and MHU

by Yann Gautier

Hello, I would like to use PSA calls for an application on STM32MP2 platform. I've seen the psa_call() API that I could use, in drivers/arm/rse/rse_comms.c. The problem is that it is based on MHU mailbox, which I don't have on STM32MP2. So I was planning plan to disentangle RSE comms and MHU, having a new file in the same directory to manage MHU. This code should then be under a flag, I could re-use PLAT_MHU_VERSION. Setting it to 0, would mean no MHU. AFAICT TF-M uses that split with a dedicated file: rse_comms_hal.c: Abstracts MHU message sending and receiving. (see https://tf-m-user-guide.trustedfirmware.org/platform/arm/rse/rse_comms.html). Do you think this approach sounds right? Thanks, Yann

1 year, 1 month

4
5
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.21 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.21 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 75124503f fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2816013 [1] dedcbb78e fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A720 erratum 2844092 [2] 9db99a3e4 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A720 erratum 2792132 [3] a0a574d70 feat(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A520(2938996) and Cortex-X4(2726228) [4] d1f63aba2 fix(spm-mm): carve out NS buffer TZC400 region [5] 4220b8313 feat(fvp): add cpu power control [6] d9daf130c docs(fvp): update FVP versions used [7] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I546044bde6e5eedd0abf61643d25e2dd2036d… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I3d8eacb26cba42774f1f31c3aae2a0e6fecec… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I8d11fe65a2ab5f79244cc3395d0645f772563… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I8f886a1c21698f546a0996c719cc27dc0a236… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Idc3370803ad204ac29efeded77305e52e17cc… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Iba6c3c8db60dbeb177cead7ebc65df8265860… [7] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ie478b81b0f09d8664966cc1fac71a775a1a95… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.21/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.6 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.6 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 582b950ed fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2816013 [1] 9d3934323 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A720 erratum 2844092 [2] a93c69bbb fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A720 erratum 2792132 [3] 74fc9576d fix(spm-mm): carve out NS buffer TZC400 region [4] 9ca6bf389 feat(fvp): add cpu power control [5] e941b0e0f fix(arm_fpga): halve number of PEs per core [6] 47010ae9d feat(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A520(2938996) and Cortex-X4(2726228) [7] c1b976727 docs(fvp): update FVP versions used [8] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I546044bde6e5eedd0abf61643d25e2dd2036d… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I3d8eacb26cba42774f1f31c3aae2a0e6fecec… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I8d11fe65a2ab5f79244cc3395d0645f772563… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Idc3370803ad204ac29efeded77305e52e17cc… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Iba6c3c8db60dbeb177cead7ebc65df8265860… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ieb37ccc9f362b10ff0ce038f72efca21512a7… [7] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I8f886a1c21698f546a0996c719cc27dc0a236… [8] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ie478b81b0f09d8664966cc1fac71a775a1a95… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.6/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 445015: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_cipher.c: 250 in mbedtls_cipher_values_from_psa() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 445015: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_cipher.c: 250 in mbedtls_cipher_values_from_psa() 244 cipher_id_tmp = MBEDTLS_CIPHER_ID_CHACHA20; 245 break; 246 #endif 247 default: 248 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 249 } >>> CID 445015: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (cipher_id != NULL) { ...". 250 if (cipher_id != NULL) { 251 *cipher_id = cipher_id_tmp; 252 } 253 254 return mbedtls_cipher_validate_values(alg, key_type); 255 } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Sep 19, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, Cancelling today's Sep 19th instance as no topic proposed. Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings Sent: 24 July 2024 17:36 To: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings <linaro.org_havjv2figrh5egaiurb229pd8c(a)group.calendar.google.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: [TF-A] Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Sep 19, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org) When: 19 September 2024 17:00-18:00. Where: This event has been canceled. We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trustedfirmware.org%2Fmeetin…> Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvd…<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro-org.zoom.us%2Fmy%2Ftruste…> One tap mobile +16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York) +16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 915 970 4974 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…> When Thursday Sep 19, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm (Central European Time - Paris) Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> Invitation from Google Calendar<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/> You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more<https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Canceled event: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Sep 19, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Sep 19, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

How to map a physical address using `mmap_add_dynamic_region_alloc_va`?

by 钱非凡

Hi experts, I tried to allocate a physical memory address in Linux Kernel, and pass the memory address to tf-a using smc call. As I asked in previous mails (https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/list/tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.…), tf-a can not access the physical memory address directly, so I try to use the `mmap_add_dynamic_region_alloc_va` function in `xlat_table_v2` Library, and map the physical memory in tf-a. After calling the function, It does return a new virtual memory address, but I still failed to access the address, is there any details I have missed? Here is the code: ``` NOTICE("phys_addr: 0x%lx, virt_addr: 0x%lx\n", phys_addr, virt_addr); int rc = mmap_add_dynamic_region_alloc_va(phys_addr, ptr_virt_addr, size, MT_NS | MT_RW_DATA); if (rc) { WARN("Failed to map memory at 0x%lx: %d\n", phys_addr, rc); return; } NOTICE("virt_addr_el3: 0x%lx\n", virt_addr_el3); NOTICE("virt_addr_el3[0] = 0x%x\n", *((uint32_t *)virt_addr_el3)); ``` Here is the output: ``` NOTICE: phys_addr: 0x40f0000, virt_addr: 0xffff0000040f0000 NOTICE: mm.base_va: 0 NOTICE: mm.base_va: 100000000 NOTICE: virt_addr_el3: 0x100000000 [ 38.540464] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 38.546584] rcu: 4-...0: (1 ticks this GP) idle=4224/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=125/125 fqs=2625 [ 38.555651] (detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=-779, q=16 ncpus=8) [ 38.561843] Task dump for CPU 4: [ 38.565075] task:main state:R running task stack:0 pid:195 ppid:181 flags:0x00000002 [ 38.575015] Call trace: [ 38.577464] __switch_to+0xe4/0x160 [ 38.580975] 0x42 ``` I would be grateful for any advice or suggestions you may have. Sincerely, Feifan

1 year, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Sep 5, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling as no topic this week. Thanks & Regards, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Sep 5, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Can't start new thread in website

by 林觀明

Hi I have a question. But, I can't launch a new thread. Can you help me? Thanks

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 6 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 6 of 6 defect(s) ** CID 443168: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) /plat/st/stm32mp2/bl2_plat_setup.c: 183 in bl2_el3_plat_arch_setup() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 443168: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) /plat/st/stm32mp2/bl2_plat_setup.c: 183 in bl2_el3_plat_arch_setup() 177 BL_CODE_END - BL_CODE_BASE, 178 MT_CODE | MT_SECURE); 179 180 configure_mmu(); 181 182 /* Prevent corruption of preloaded Device Tree */ >>> CID 443168: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) >>> Calling "mmap_add_dynamic_region" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 25 out of 29 times). 183 mmap_add_dynamic_region(DTB_BASE, DTB_BASE, 184 DTB_LIMIT - DTB_BASE, 185 MT_RO_DATA | MT_SECURE); 186 187 if (dt_open_and_check(STM32MP_DTB_BASE) < 0) { 188 panic(); ** CID 443167: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 578 in rk3588_b0pll_get_rate() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 443167: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 578 in rk3588_b0pll_get_rate() 572 573 rate64 *= m; 574 rate64 = rate64 / p; 575 576 if (k != 0) { 577 /* fractional mode */ >>> CID 443167: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) >>> Potentially overflowing expression "24000000U * k" with type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and then used in a context that expects an expression of type "uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned). 578 uint64_t frac_rate64 = 24000000 * k; 579 580 postdiv = p * 65535; 581 frac_rate64 = frac_rate64 / postdiv; 582 rate64 += frac_rate64; 583 } ** CID 443166: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 443166: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /plat/intel/soc/common/socfpga_vab.c: 97 in socfpga_vab_authentication() 91 if (!IS_BYTE_ALIGNED(img_sz, sizeof(uint32_t))) { 92 ERROR("Image size (%d bytes) not aliged to 4 bytes!\n", img_sz); 93 return -EIMGERR; 94 } 95 96 /* Generate HASH384 from the image */ >>> CID 443166: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array "hash384" of 12 bytes by passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 47. 97 sha384_start((uint8_t *)img_addr, img_sz, hash384, CHUNKSZ_PER_WD_RESET); 98 cert_hash_ptr = (uint8_t *)(img_addr + img_sz + VAB_CERT_MAGIC_OFFSET + 99 VAB_CERT_FIT_SHA384_OFFSET); 100 101 /* 102 * Compare the SHA384 found in certificate against the SHA384 ** CID 443165: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 747 in rk3588_b1pll_get_rate() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 443165: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 747 in rk3588_b1pll_get_rate() 741 742 rate64 *= m; 743 rate64 = rate64 / p; 744 745 if (k != 0) { 746 /* fractional mode */ >>> CID 443165: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) >>> Potentially overflowing expression "24000000U * k" with type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and then used in a context that expects an expression of type "uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned). 747 uint64_t frac_rate64 = 24000000 * k; 748 749 postdiv = p * 65535; 750 frac_rate64 = frac_rate64 / postdiv; 751 rate64 += frac_rate64; 752 } ** CID 443164: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 408 in rk3588_lpll_get_rate() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 443164: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) /plat/rockchip/rk3588/drivers/scmi/rk3588_clk.c: 408 in rk3588_lpll_get_rate() 402 403 rate64 *= m; 404 rate64 = rate64 / p; 405 406 if (k != 0) { 407 /* fractional mode */ >>> CID 443164: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN) >>> Potentially overflowing expression "24000000U * k" with type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and then used in a context that expects an expression of type "uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned). 408 uint64_t frac_rate64 = 24000000 * k; 409 410 postdiv = p * 65535; 411 frac_rate64 = frac_rate64 / postdiv; 412 rate64 += frac_rate64; 413 } ** CID 254051: Memory - illegal accesses (OVERRUN) /plat/intel/soc/common/lib/sha/sha.c: 206 in sha512_base_do_finalize() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 254051: Memory - illegal accesses (OVERRUN) /plat/intel/soc/common/lib/sha/sha.c: 206 in sha512_base_do_finalize() 200 const int bit_offset = SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - sizeof(uint64_t[2]); 201 uint64_t *bits = (uint64_t *)(sctx->buf + bit_offset); 202 unsigned int partial = sctx->count[0] % SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE; 203 204 sctx->buf[partial++] = 0x80; 205 if (partial > bit_offset) { >>> CID 254051: Memory - illegal accesses (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array of 128 bytes at byte offset 128 by dereferencing pointer "sctx->buf + partial". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.] 206 memset(sctx->buf + partial, 0x0, SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - partial); 207 partial = 0; 208 209 sha512_block_fn(sctx, sctx->buf, 1); 210 } 211 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Aug 22, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling today as no topic. Regards, Olivier." TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Aug 22, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: TF-A Tech Forum

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, cancelling today as no topic. Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings Sent: 24 July 2024 17:36 To: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings <linaro.org_havjv2figrh5egaiurb229pd8c(a)group.calendar.google.com>; marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com <marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com>; okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com <okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: TF-A Tech Forum When: 22 August 2024 17:00-18:00. Where: TF-A Tech Forum We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this This event has been updated We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trustedfirmware.org%2Fmeetin…> Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvd…<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro-org.zoom.us%2Fmy%2Ftruste…> One tap mobile +16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York) +16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 915 970 4974 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…> When Every 2 weeks from 8am to 9am on Thursday (Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix) Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com<mailto:marek.bykowski@gmail.com> okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com<mailto:okash.khawaja@gmail.com> tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> View all guest info<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> RSVP for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> for all events in this series <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> Yes <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> No <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> Maybe <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> More options Invitation from Google Calendar<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/> You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more<https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Query regarding the test coverage thru tf-a-tests

by Thangaraj, Senthil Nathan

Dear TF-A team, I have a query regarding the TF-A test. Specifically, I would like to know if there is a method to find out the code coverage for a specific test or for all the tests in current run? Your direction in this regard will be really appreciated. Thank you, Senthil

1 year, 2 months

1
0
1 0

Arm TF-A can not access linux kernel's virtual/physical address?

by 钱非凡

In my opinion, Arm TF-A (EL3) has higher privileges than Linux Kernel (EL1), and Secure World should be able to access all memory address in Normal World. To verify this feature, I added a new SMC call in Arm TF-A and wrote a kernel module to test it (on a Hikey960 Development Board). But the program does not run as expected that Arm TF-A stucked while accessing the memory address passed by Linux Kernel. Here is my kernel module, which uses `alloc_pages` to acquire a physical address, and uses `page_address` converting it to a virtual address. And the module passes the physical address and the virtual address to Arm TF-A using `smc #0`: ```cpp static int __init smc_testing_init(void) { uintptr_t phys_addr, virt_addr; pr_info("Mmodule loaded\n"); phys_addr = (uintptr_t) alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 2); virt_addr = (uintptr_t) page_address((struct page *) phys_addr); memset((void *) virt_addr, 'A', PAGE_SIZE << 2); printk("phys_addr: 0x%llx, virt_addr: 0x%llx\n", (uint64_t) phys_addr, (uint64_t) virt_addr); asm volatile( "ldr x0, =0xC8000003\n" "mov x1, %0\n" "mov x2, %1\n" "smc #0\n" : : "r" (phys_addr), "r" (virt_addr) : "x0", "x1", "x2" ); __free_pages((struct page *) phys_addr, 2); return 0; } static void __exit smc_testing_exit(void) { pr_info("Module unloaded\n"); } ``` And here is the handler's code in Arm TF-A, which prints the addresses of physical address and virtual address, and access the first element of the memory address: ```cpp if (0xC8000003 == smc_fid) { uintptr_t virt_addr = x3; NOTICE("phys_addr: 0x%lx, virt_addr: 0x%lx\n", phys_addr, virt_addr); NOTICE("virt_addr[0] = 0x%x\n", *((uint32_t *)virt_addr)); NOTICE("phys_addr[0] = 0x%x\n", *((uint32_t *)phys_addr)); SMC_RET0(handle); } ``` Here is the output, Arm TF-A handles the request successfully, but failed to access the memory address passed by Linux Kernel: ```bash # insmod ./smc_testing.ko [ 75.259590] smc_testing: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 75.266682] Mmodule loaded [ 75.269404] phys_addr: 0xfffffc0002dc5e00, virt_addr: 0xffff0000b7178000 NOTICE: phys_addr: 0xfffffc0002dc5e00, virt_addr: 0xffff0000b7178000 [ 96.276605] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 96.282741] rcu: 4-...0: (1 ticks this GP) idle=72ec/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=204/204 fqs=2592 [ 96.291835] (detected by 0, t=5253 jiffies, g=-643, q=16 ncpus=8) [ 96.298044] Task dump for CPU 4: [ 96.301287] task:insmod state:R running task stack:0 pid:201 ppid:185 flags:0x00000006 [ 96.311254] Call trace: [ 96.313713] __switch_to+0xe4/0x160 [ 96.317241] printk_rb_static+0x30/0x58 ```

1 year, 2 months

2
1
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 441243: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 441243: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /plat/xilinx/common/pm_service/pm_svc_main.c: 516 in eemi_api_handler() 510 module_id = (api_id & MODULE_ID_MASK) >> 8U; 511 512 PM_PACK_PAYLOAD7(payload, module_id, security_flag, api_id, 513 pm_arg[0], pm_arg[1], pm_arg[2], pm_arg[3], 514 pm_arg[4], pm_arg[5]); 515 >>> CID 441243: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning callee's array of size 7 by passing argument "7UL" in call to "pm_ipi_send_sync". 516 ret = pm_ipi_send_sync(primary_proc, payload, (uint32_t *)buf, 517 PAYLOAD_ARG_CNT); 518 519 SMC_RET4(handle, (uint64_t)ret | ((uint64_t)buf[0] << 32U), 520 (uint64_t)buf[1] | ((uint64_t)buf[2] << 32U), 521 (uint64_t)buf[3] | ((uint64_t)buf[4] << 32U), ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Aug 8, 2024 4pm - 5pm (BST) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Joanna Farley

This event has been canceled with a note: "No topics scheduled this week so cancelling. Also a lot of people seem to be away on vacations." TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Aug 8, 2024 ⋅ 4pm – 5pm United Kingdom Time We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 440627: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /plat/allwinner/sun50i_h616/sunxi_h616_dtb.c: 56 in sunxi_soc_fdt_fixup() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 440627: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /plat/allwinner/sun50i_h616/sunxi_h616_dtb.c: 56 in sunxi_soc_fdt_fixup() 50 if (ret != 0) { 51 return; 52 } 53 54 node = fdt_node_offset_by_phandle(dtb, phandle); 55 if (ret != 0) { >>> CID 440627: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach this statement: "return;". 56 return; 57 } 58 59 ccsidr = armv8_get_ccsidr(CACHE_L2U); 60 sets = ((ccsidr >> CCSIDR_SETS_SHIFT) & CCSIDR_SETS_MASK) + 1; 61 line_size = 16U << ((ccsidr >> CCSIDR_LSIZE_SHIFT) & CCSIDR_LSIZE_MASK); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc

by Jothikumar Mani

HI Andy, Thank you for explaining, psa-arch-test(psa certified api compliance) testsuite currently used with TFM +MbedTLS environment as a release gate, and there is trusted service team whom were running the psa-arch-test package on arm-A class devices. Coming back to the question related to psa-arch-test, the current available package should suffice to check the compliance of crypto necessary tasks/functinoality, fyi we have already validated the latest psa-arch-test repo with the mbedtls 3.6. So I would not be more concern about the psa-arch-test being compliant to latest 1.2.1 spec. because between 1.1.0 and 1.2.1 there were minimal changes which is not showstopper for the psa certified api certification. Regards, JK From: Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com> Date: Thursday, 25 July 2024 at 5:30 AM To: Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com>, Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com>, tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Cc: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com>, Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com>, Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com> Subject: 回覆: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Jothikumar and Manish, It's great to discuss with you and thanks. Sure, it's more clarity with usage scenarios: 1. As a Security IP provider, our PUFcc functions as a Hardware Root of Trust. However, mbedTLS currently doesn't fully support HRoT. Therefore, we are integrating directly into the PSA Crypto API, which permits customization. 1. While working on PSA L3 or L2R, we frequently face version conflicts. That why, in this project, we aim to confirm these version issues (including the dev. and test bench). 1. This also means that both TF-A and TF-M support PSA Crypto API, so we can also support both through this package. There is our PSA Software Package with PUFcc. We try to find the best way to support cryptographic tasks. Additionally, we plan to use the same development platform as ARM to ensure optimal compatibility for our customers. It means we would try to know the FPV, although I'm not sure if we can add external IPs. If I misunderstood or you have any ideas, please feel free to tell me. [cid:ed0bb76e-fb77-4502-ae5d-f8443d6b4fc4] Have a Nice Day, Andy ________________________________ 寄件者: Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com> 寄件日期: 2024年7月24日下午 11:48 收件者: Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com>; Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> 副本: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com> 主旨: RE: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Andy, Please find my reply in the previous mail. Regards, JK From: Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 8:11 PM To: Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com>; Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com> Subject: 回覆: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Manish, Thanks for your information. We need to integrate our hardware Crypto IP (PUFcc). And it seems that FVP cannot add custom IP, so we are planning to purchase an FPGA with the A53 - AXU9EGB<https://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/1-1ervp7b.html> for our needs. And we need to make sure it is compatible with TF-A lts-v2.10.5. Thanks. Hi Jothikumar, We would try to integrate with PSA Crypto API, and we need a test bench for v1.2.1. Please feel free to let me know if you have any suggestions. [JK] : may I know what the intent is to requesting the crypto v1.2.1 spec compliance suites?, if you are looking for the PSA Certified APIs compliance for your product then the currently available testsuite is more than sufficient. Also, the mbedTLS version mentioned also only supports psa-crypto spec v1.1.0. I am trying to under the end goal of the psa certified api compliance suite usage with your product. Answer to this question will help me to give better suggestion. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 >>> v1.2.1 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 Thank you very much. Have a Nice Day, Andy ________________________________ 寄件者: Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com<mailto:Manish.Badarkhe@arm.com>> 寄件日期: 2024年7月24日下午 06:12 收件者: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>; Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com>>; Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com<mailto:Jothikumar.Mani@arm.com>> 副本: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com<mailto:Diya.Soubra@arm.com>>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:victorialee@pufsecurity.com>>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andrewirvin@pufsecurity.com>> 主旨: Re: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Andy Please see my replies inline. Adding Jothikumar Mani for PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite. Thanks, Manish Badarkhe ________________________________ From: Andy Chen via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> Sent: 23 July 2024 09:55 To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> Cc: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com<mailto:Diya.Soubra@arm.com>>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:victorialee@pufsecurity.com>>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andrewirvin@pufsecurity.com>> Subject: [TF-A] Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi TF-A teams, This is Andy from PUFsecurity, and we have a project with ARM. We try to integrate the PSA Crypto API with PUFcc (Our Crypto Engine) on TF-A. However, there are multiple versions included, and we need your assistance for specification clarification. Please ensure the versions match your recommendations. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 [MB]: This looks fine. As TF-A lts-v2.10.5 using mbedTLS v3.6.0 which is compliance with PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 but mbedTLS team can provide more detailed answer on this and also on test suite PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6. TF-A It would be beneficial to use the same hardware (FPGA) and tools as the ARM development team. If we can confirm which models are used for TF-A , scripts or details with the ARM hardware That would be grateful. [MB]: We are using FVP AEM model i.e. FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMvA (Model version: 11.26, Build: 11). Test Run with PSA Crypto you can find here: https://ci.trustedfirmware.org/job/tf-a-builder/4029201/ (today's daily run) PSA Crypto API - The test bench is using the PSA Crypto API v1.1.0, and it is published in 2022. And Now is v1.2.1 in March 2024. I not sure it is a good choose or not. [cid:image001.png@01DADE0E.1BA75330] [MB]: It looks like arch-test is not upgraded to use v1.2.1 PSA Crypto API. Added Jothikumar Mani, he may have idea about this. Test Bench - For the "PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6," we would like to identify which test codes (test_c001 to test_c067) are relevant for TF-A. [MB]: Again, TF-A is not using this test suite, so we don't have any insights unless we review all these tests. TF-A mainly uses the following PSA_* APIs for signature verification, hash calculation, and hash comparison. psa_crypto_init mbedtls_md_psa_alg_from_type psa_set_key_algorithm psa_set_key_type psa_set_key_usage_flags psa_import_key psa_destroy_key psa_verify_message psa_hash_compute psa_hash_compare Thank you very much!!! Have a Nice Day, Andy [cid:image002.png@01DADE0E.1BA75330] 熵碼科技股份有限公司 Tel: 886-3-5601010 #2119 Email: andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com> Website: https://www.pufsecurity.com/ -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.--------

1 year, 3 months

2
2
0 0

Re: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc

by Jothikumar Mani

Hi Andy, Please find my reply in the previous mail. Regards, JK From: Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 8:11 PM To: Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com>; Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com>; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com> Subject: 回覆: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Manish, Thanks for your information. We need to integrate our hardware Crypto IP (PUFcc). And it seems that FVP cannot add custom IP, so we are planning to purchase an FPGA with the A53 - AXU9EGB<https://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/1-1ervp7b.html> for our needs. And we need to make sure it is compatible with TF-A lts-v2.10.5. Thanks. Hi Jothikumar, We would try to integrate with PSA Crypto API, and we need a test bench for v1.2.1. Please feel free to let me know if you have any suggestions. [JK] : may I know what the intent is to requesting the crypto v1.2.1 spec compliance suites?, if you are looking for the PSA Certified APIs compliance for your product then the currently available testsuite is more than sufficient. Also, the mbedTLS version mentioned also only supports psa-crypto spec v1.1.0. I am trying to under the end goal of the psa certified api compliance suite usage with your product. Answer to this question will help me to give better suggestion. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 >>> v1.2.1 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 Thank you very much. Have a Nice Day, Andy ________________________________ 寄件者: Manish Badarkhe <Manish.Badarkhe(a)arm.com<mailto:Manish.Badarkhe@arm.com>> 寄件日期: 2024年7月24日下午 06:12 收件者: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>>; Andy Chen <andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com>>; Jothikumar Mani <Jothikumar.Mani(a)arm.com<mailto:Jothikumar.Mani@arm.com>> 副本: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com<mailto:Diya.Soubra@arm.com>>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:victorialee@pufsecurity.com>>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andrewirvin@pufsecurity.com>> 主旨: Re: Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi Andy Please see my replies inline. Adding Jothikumar Mani for PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite. Thanks, Manish Badarkhe ________________________________ From: Andy Chen via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> Sent: 23 July 2024 09:55 To: tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org>> Cc: Diya Soubra <Diya.Soubra(a)arm.com<mailto:Diya.Soubra@arm.com>>; Victoria Lee <victorialee(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:victorialee@pufsecurity.com>>; Andrew <andrewirvin(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andrewirvin@pufsecurity.com>> Subject: [TF-A] Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc Hi TF-A teams, This is Andy from PUFsecurity, and we have a project with ARM. We try to integrate the PSA Crypto API with PUFcc (Our Crypto Engine) on TF-A. However, there are multiple versions included, and we need your assistance for specification clarification. Please ensure the versions match your recommendations. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 [MB]: This looks fine. As TF-A lts-v2.10.5 using mbedTLS v3.6.0 which is compliance with PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 but mbedTLS team can provide more detailed answer on this and also on test suite PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6. TF-A It would be beneficial to use the same hardware (FPGA) and tools as the ARM development team. If we can confirm which models are used for TF-A , scripts or details with the ARM hardware That would be grateful. [MB]: We are using FVP AEM model i.e. FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMvA (Model version: 11.26, Build: 11). Test Run with PSA Crypto you can find here: https://ci.trustedfirmware.org/job/tf-a-builder/4029201/ (today's daily run) PSA Crypto API - The test bench is using the PSA Crypto API v1.1.0, and it is published in 2022. And Now is v1.2.1 in March 2024. I not sure it is a good choose or not. [cid:image001.png@01DADE0E.1BA75330] [MB]: It looks like arch-test is not upgraded to use v1.2.1 PSA Crypto API. Added Jothikumar Mani, he may have idea about this. Test Bench - For the "PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6," we would like to identify which test codes (test_c001 to test_c067) are relevant for TF-A. [MB]: Again, TF-A is not using this test suite, so we don't have any insights unless we review all these tests. TF-A mainly uses the following PSA_* APIs for signature verification, hash calculation, and hash comparison. psa_crypto_init mbedtls_md_psa_alg_from_type psa_set_key_algorithm psa_set_key_type psa_set_key_usage_flags psa_import_key psa_destroy_key psa_verify_message psa_hash_compute psa_hash_compare Thank you very much!!! Have a Nice Day, Andy [cid:image002.png@01DADE0E.1BA75330] 熵碼科技股份有限公司 Tel: 886-3-5601010 #2119 Email: andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com> Website: https://www.pufsecurity.com/ -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.--------

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Updated invitation: TF-A Tech Forum @ Every 2 weeks from 8am to 9am on Thursday (MST) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Don Harbin

This event has been updated TF-A Tech Forum Every 2 weeks from 8am to 9am on Thursday Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org View all guest info https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Reply for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org and view more details https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Your attendance is optional. ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Updated invitation: TF-A Tech Forum @ Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday from Thu Mar 7 to Wed Jul 24 (MST) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Don Harbin

This event has been updated Changed: time TF-A Tech Forum Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday from Thursday Mar 7 to Wednesday Jul 24 Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org View all guest info https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Reply for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org and view more details https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Your attendance is optional. ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc

by Andy Chen

Hi TF-A teams, This is Andy from PUFsecurity, and we have a project with ARM. We try to integrate the PSA Crypto API with PUFcc (Our Crypto Engine) on TF-A. However, there are multiple versions included, and we need your assistance for specification clarification. Please ensure the versions match your recommendations. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 TF-A It would be beneficial to use the same hardware (FPGA) and tools as the ARM development team. If we can confirm which models are used for TF-A , scripts or details with the ARM hardware That would be grateful. PSA Crypto API - The test bench is using the PSA Crypto API v1.1.0, and it is published in 2022. And Now is v1.2.1 in March 2024. I not sure it is a good choose or not. [cid:0e747007-8c2a-49a7-9447-8d5e7f9a3e9c] Test Bench - For the "PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6," we would like to identify which test codes (test_c001 to test_c067) are relevant for TF-A. Thank you very much!!! Have a Nice Day, Andy [cid:74269c28-12d4-48a9-b215-3d3eaf95f2c3] 熵碼科技股份有限公司 Tel: 886-3-5601010 #2119 Email: andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com> Website: https://www.pufsecurity.com/ -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.--------

1 year, 3 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 25th 2024 - Unification of Chain of Trust Descriptors

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, On Jul 25th in the TF-A Tech Forum: Unification of Chain of Trust Descriptors - presented by Xialin Liu Currently, the Chain of Trust is implemented using C data structures built into the firmware or through device tree nodes. Maintaining both formats can lead to maintenance challenges. Therefore, we are standardizing the provision of Chain of Trust descriptors exclusively via the device tree and providing a tool to convert device tree descriptors into C source files. This approach simplifies the process, ensuring consistency and reducing the potential for errors associated with managing multiple formats. Regards, Olivier. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jul 25, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Firmware Partition Filesystem query

by Ghennadi Procopciuc

Greetings everyone, I came across the following paragraph while reading the 'Firmware Partition Filesystem' chapter from EBBR v2.2.0 and I would like to clarify my understanding: Where possible, firmware images and data should be stored in a filesystem. Firmware can be stored either in a dedicated firmware partition, or in certain circumstances in the UEFI System Partition (ESP). Using a filesystem makes it simpler to manage multiple firmware files and makes it possible for a single disk image to contain firmware for multiple platforms. Dedicated firmware partitions should be formatted with a FAT filesystem as defined in UEFI § 13.3 File System Format. Dedicated firmware partitions should use the same /FIRMWARE directory hierarchy. OS tools shall ignore dedicated firmware partitions, and shall not attempt to use a dedicated firmware partition as an ESP Questions: 1. Does the above paragraph mean that, if the device allows, all firmware binaries (TF-A, U-Boot, and some others) must be stored in a dedicated firmware partition formatted with a FAT filesystem and GUID Partition Table (GPT) disk layout? 2. If so, would this also mean that, where possible, the BootROM or a (first stage) bootloader running before TF-A should have GPT and FAT support embedded support to load one of the TF-A stages (BL1/BL2)? Regards, Ghennadi

1 year, 3 months

5
7
0 0

Proper message for ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES case

by Bollapalli, Maheedhar Sai

Hi, On AMD-Xilinx ZynqMP platform for ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES case; the log appearing on the console is as below: "VERBOSE: BL31: cortex_a53: CPU workaround for erratum 819472was not applied". We checked ZynqMP code and found that the ZynqMP cpu revision was higher than the cpu revision intended in the erratum and hence it was not applicable and not applied. The message seems inappropriate to us as from log message it is not clear why it wasn't applied. Our suggestion is that in the log message instead of "not applied" it should be mentioned as "not applicable" as indicated below to reflect the reason properly. "VERBOSE: BL31: cortex_a53: CPU workaround for erratum 819472 was not applicable". Regards, Maheedhar.

1 year, 3 months

2
1
0 0

BL2 does find only 2 images

by Labs, Torsten

Hey all, i tried to setup a fip.bin and add 3 images (bl31, bl32 and bl33). ./fiptool --verbose create --soc-fw bl31.bin --nt-fw bl33.bin --tos-fw bl32.bin fip.bin When i check the generated fip.bin with fiptool info it shows me all my three images in the fip.bin EL3 Runtime Firmware BL31: offset=0xB0, size=0x13644, cmdline="--soc-fw" Secure Payload BL32 (Trusted OS): offset=0x136F4, size=0x18D864, cmdline="--tos-fw" Non-Trusted Firmware BL33: offset=0x1A0F58, size=0x9692E, cmdline="--nt-fw" But during bootup the BL2 finds only the image id =3 and image id=5 which is BL32 and BL33. Why he is not finding the bl32? Thanks for youre short help. Regards Torsten

1 year, 3 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 11th 2024 - Using the SMC Fuzzing Module in TF-A

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, This Thursday Jul 11th Kathleen Capella from Arm's TF-A team will present: **Using the SMC Fuzzing Module in TF-A** This presentation will show how you might get started with fuzz testing using the SMC fuzzing module in TF-A. I will demonstrate the basic fuzzer features, how to add SMC calls/test cases and how to make use of the module's integration with tf-a-tests and the TF-A CI. Regards, Olivier. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jul 11, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org

1 year, 3 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 18th 2024 - NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, On Thursday Jul 18th 2024 Rohit Mathew from Arm's Infra solutions team will present: ** NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage Efficiency** With the increasing prevalence of multi-chip platforms, it is crucial for software written for Trusted Firmware-A to be NUMA-aware. The PER-CPU framework addresses this need by distributing the allocation of per-CPU objects across different NUMA nodes. This approach reduces NUMA latency and balances the allocation load, leading to improved performance and efficiency. Regards, Olivier. NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage Efficiency Thursday Jul 18, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 5:50pm Central European Time - Paris Location zoom, see dial-in information below https://www.google.com/maps/search/zoom,+see+dial-in+information+below?hl=en NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage EfficiencyWith the increasing prevalence of multi-chip platforms, it is crucial for software written for Trusted Firmware-A to be NUMA-aware. The PER-CPU framework addresses this need by distributing the allocation of per-CPU objects across different NUMA nodes. This approach reduces NUMA latency and balances the allocation load, leading to improved performance and efficiency.Dial In Information:Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/9159704974?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09Meeting ID: 915 970 4974Passcode: Mj6NdM---One tap mobile+13462487799,,9159704974# US (Houston)+16694449171,,9159704974# US---Dial by your location• +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)• +1 669 444 9171 US• +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)• +1 719 359 4580 US• +1 253 205 0468 US• +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)• +1 646 931 3860 US• +1 689 278 1000 US• +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)• +1 305 224 1968 US• +1 309 205 3325 US• +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)• +1 360 209 5623 US• +1 386 347 5053 US• +1 507 473 4847 US• +1 564 217 2000 US• +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)• 833 548 0276 US Toll-free• 833 548 0282 US Toll-free• 833 928 4608 US Toll-free• 833 928 4609 US Toll-free• 833 928 4610 US Toll-free• 877 853 5247 US Toll-free• 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://linaro-org.zoom.us/u/aZXJZYXK

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Native compilation failed on dev board not able to find the gcc

by Anand Moon

Hi All, I am trying to compile the latest ATF on Raspberry Pi 5 but it fails. This is the same for all the other Arm64 architecture I have. Earlier versions of ATF were able to compile on-board with native gcc. Well with CROSS_COMPILE it works fine on x86_64 machine. alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ make PLAT=rpi5 DEBUG=1 make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 C compiler could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 C compiler is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this C compiler as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 C preprocessor could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 C preprocessor is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this C preprocessor as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 assembler could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 assembler is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this assembler as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 linker could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 linker is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armlink` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM LLD (`lld`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU LD (`ld.bfd`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this linker as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 object copier could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objcopy make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 object copier is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objcopy make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `fromelf` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-objcopy` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `objcopy` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this object copier as GNU `objcopy`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 object dumper could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objdump make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 object dumper is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objdump make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `fromelf` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-objdump` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `objdump` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this object dumper as GNU `objdump`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 archiver could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc-ar make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 archiver is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc-ar make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-ar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `ar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this archiver as GNU `ar`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: not found /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: not found CC bl31/bl31_context_mgmt.c make: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: No such file or directory make: *** [Makefile:1514: /home/alarm/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a/build/rpi5/debug/bl31/bl31_context_mgmt.o] Error 127 alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 12.2.0-14' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-12/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-12 --program-prefix=aarch64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.2.0 (Debian 12.2.0-14) Thanks -Anand

1 year, 3 months

3
7
0 0

Re: Questions about the Fault Handling of GPFs

by Olivier Deprez

Hi Feifan Qian, Trapping GPF to EL3 is permitted by the architecture, however I don't believe TF-A provides such option. In general for TF-A's reference software stacks, a GPF is trapped first at EL2 (hence SCR_EL3.GPF=0). E.g. In a system implementing RME, the RMM (@ R-EL2) traps a GPF occurring in an R-EL1/0 Realm (or R-EL2 itself). Similarly, in the secure world, the SPM (@ S-EL2) traps a GPF occurring in a S-EL1/0 secure partition (or S-EL2 itself). Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: 钱非凡 <qianfeifan(a)iie.ac.cn> Sent: 01 July 2024 08:52 To: tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: Questions about the Fault Handling of GPFs Dear experts, I have been learning the Fault Handling of the Granule Protection Fault in Arm CCA. Upon studying the Arm Document, I discovered that the GPF bit in the SCR_EL3 register controls whether the fault handling of GPFs occurs in EL3 or not. In addition, I noted that `include/arch/aarch64/arch.h` defines a macro `#define SCR_GPF_BIT (UL(1) << 48)`, yet I could not find any reference to this macro in the source code. I want to know that whether ATF has implemented the fault handling of GPFs or if this is a feature to be expected in the future. If its not, how can I implement this. Any guidance or advice you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Feifan Qian

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.20 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.20 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 4da2210db chore: add encrypt_fw to gitignore [1] e0124e1ba feat(build): allow additional CFLAGS for library build [2] d7f618143 refactor(mbedtls): avoid including MBEDTLS_CONFIG_FILE [3] fd566c3cd feat(mbedtls): add support for mbedtls-3.3 [4] bf740eba7 feat(fvp): increase BL1_RW and BL2 size [5] ef7aac710 refactor(fvp): minor cleanup with TRUSTED_BOARD_BOOT [6] c82afd25b feat(stm32mp1): add mbedtls-3.3 support config [7] 488514a66 docs(prerequisites): update software and libraries prerequisites [8] a353e39e8 feat(mbedtls): update to 3.4.1 [9] 07126ffb4 build(mbedtls): add deprecation notice [10] 87f4a6305 refactor(mbedtls): remove mbedtls 2.x support [11] e8ae4fa2b feat(mbedtls): update config for 3.6.0 [12] b437905e2 docs(prerequisites): update mbedtls version used [13] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I2f4ddbe1c11848513fe20f7c8b448a041988c… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ic99af22b229f8089c82110d6545f762c14a62… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I029992311be2a38b588ebbb350875b03ea29a… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib034036c09fbdc573d9427b1eda6f2387bda2… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I8a423711ac50b3d615c1d9650086cdbca5051… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I800524d54ea56dc27b6c6da26c75a07f5f6de… [7] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I4581cb0ea7b2c7022e71aefd7ff05ee3a72f5… [8] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I384aab4dfee9cae9453eebf4091abe82ef9cc… [9] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ifc31c2fc825a2fc9ca318ea8baadd51b670e7… [10] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I669b423ee9af9f5c5255fce370413fffaf38e… [11] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Id3eb98b55692df98aabe6a7c5a5ec910222c8… [12] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib345b0bd4f2994f366629ed162d18814fd05a… [13] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I6bd8fcca795373a05bc6beb2e085d24fdd149… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.8.20/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.5 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.10.5 is now available. This release contains the following patches: 1d3bb2fe6 refactor(mbedtls): remove mbedtls 2.x support [1] 05ec367ba feat(mbedtls): update config for 3.6.0 [2] aa84a9dad docs(prerequisites): update mbedtls version used [3] ee945f1d2 fix(mbedtls): sign verification issue with invalid Key/Signature [4] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Id3eb98b55692df98aabe6a7c5a5ec910222c8… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib345b0bd4f2994f366629ed162d18814fd05a… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I6bd8fcca795373a05bc6beb2e085d24fdd149… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ib484d97a04b7a82dd72592c8b5b153d577d01… Alternatively, Change Log is available in the documentation section: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/lts-v2.10.5/change-log.html Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Jun 27, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling as no topic planned. Regards, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jun 27, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Jun 13, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling this instance as no topic proposed. Thanks, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jun 13, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu May 30, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling for this week as no topic proposed. Thanks, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday May 30, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware v2.10 Release Announcement

by Olivier Deprez

Hi All, We are pleased to announce the formal release of Trusted Firmware-A version 2.10 bundle of project deliverables. This includes Trusted Firmware-A, Trusted Firmware-A Tests, Hafnium, RMM and TF-A OpenCI Scripts/Jobs 2.10 releases involving the tagging of multiple repositories. These went live on 22nd November 2023. Please find references to tags and change logs at the end of this email. Many thanks to the community for the active engagement in delivering this release! Notable Features of the Version 2.10 Release are as follows: TF-A/EL3 Root World * New Features: * Firmware handoff library support * Improvements to BL31 runtime exception handling * Context management refactoring for RME/4 worlds * Gelas, Nevis & Travis CPUs support * V8.9 features enabled (FEAT_ HAFT, RPRFM, LRCPC3, MTE_PERM) TF-A Boot BL1/BL2 * New Features * Trusted Boot support for ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) * Migrated to PSA crypto API’s * Improved the GUID Partition Table (GPT) parser. * Various security Improvements and threat Model updates for ARM CCA * Signer id extraction Implementation Hafnium/SEL2 SPM * New Features: * FF-A v1.2: FFA_YIELD with time-out; EL3 SPMDs LSPs communication; memory sharing updates. * Memory region relative base address field support in SP manifests. * Interrupt re-configuration hypervisor calls. * Memory management: S2 PT NS/S IPA split * SMCCCv1.2+ compliance fixes. * Feature parity test improvements, EL3 SPMC and Hafnium (S-EL2 SPMC) TF-RMM/REL2 * New Feature/Support * Fenimore v1.0 EAC5 aligned implementation. * TFTF Enhancements for RME testing * Initial CBMC support * NS SME support in RMM * BTI support for RMM Errata * Errata implemented (1xCortex-X2/ Matterhorn-ELP, 1xCortex-A710/Matterhorn, 1xNeoverse N2/Perseus, 2xNeoverse V2/Demeter, Makalu ELP/Cortex X3, Klein/Cortex-A510) * Fix some minor defects with version in a few errata that applies for some follow up revisions of the CPUs. (Neoverse V1, Cortex-X2, Cortex-A710) TF-A Tests * Core * Added errata management firmware interface tests. * Added firmware handoff tests. * Introduced RAS KFH support test. * SPM/FF-A * Support SMCCCv1.2 extended GP registers set. * Test SMCCC compliance at the non-secure physical instance. * Test secure eSPI interrupt handling. * Test FF-A v1.2 FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_REGS interface. * RMM * Added FPU/SVE/SME tests * Added multiple REC single CPU tests. * Added PAuth support in Realms tests. * Added PMU tests. Platform Support * New platforms added: * Aspeed AST2700, NXP IMX93, Intel Agilex5, Nuvoton NPCM845x, QTI MDM9607, MSM8909, MSM8939, ST STM32MP2 Release tags across repositories: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/tf-a-tests.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-ci-scripts.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-job-configs.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/hafnium/hafnium.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-ci-scripts.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-job-configs.git/tag/?h=v2.10 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-RMM/tf-rmm.git/tag/?h=tf-rmm-v0.4.0 Change logs: https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/v2.10/change-log.html#id1 https://trustedfirmware-a-tests.readthedocs.io/en/v2.10/change-log.html#ver… https://hafnium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/change-log.html#v2-10 https://tf-rmm.readthedocs.io/en/tf-rmm-v0.4.0/about/change-log.html#v0-4-0 Regards, Olivier.

1 year, 5 months

1
1
0 0

regarding AS and AR values with clang compiler

by Nagal, Amit

Hi , We are trying to build the TF-A code using clang compiler . Instructions are followed as per the conf page https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/getting_started/initial-… 1. export CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-aarch64-gcc>/bin/aarch64-none-elf- 2. make CC=<path-to-armclang>/bin/armclang PLAT=<platform> all in our side , make CC=/tools/installs/arm/safety/armcc/6.6.2/bin/armclang PLAT=zynqmp distclean 3. with steps 1) and 2) , we observe the value of AS and AR getting set as below: AS = /tools/installs/arm/safety/armcc/6.6.2/bin/armclang -c -x assembler-with-cpp -target aarch64-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8-a AR = <path-to-aarch64-gcc>/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-ar 4. However in /tools/installs/arm/safety/armcc/6.6.2/bin , clang tool specific AS points to armasm and AR points to armar utility. 5. From above output in point 4 , we can see that AS and AR does not refer to clang toolchain utilities armasm and armar. From point 3) , AS still points to armclang utility only instead of armasm , while AR still points to aarch64-linux-gnu-ar instead of armar . 6. Can we be guided if the above outputs are correct to use wrt TF-A code build using clang compiler ? And whether any modifications can be done to point AS and AR to clang toolchain specific utilities as mentioned in step 4. Regards Amit

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

Maintainer for Marvell platforms

by Manish Pandey2

Hi, We do not have active maintainer for Marvell platform. As per docs/about/maintainers.rst the current maintainer is "Konstantin Porotchkin <kostap(a)marvell.com>". Is anybody willing to take ownership of the platform, preferably people who have contributed to this platform in past. Thanks Manish

1 year, 5 months

4
3
0 0

Make TF-A (bl31) (El3 firmware) preemtible

by Kamlesh Gurudasani

Clock and power management in ATF, preemption issue. I have seen that multiple Vendors are using arm scmi protocol to do clock management in bl31[0][1]. The problem with such implementations is any long running SCMI operations (like PLL locking for example) will hold the core in EL3 for extended period of time, adding to latency of NS EL1 interrupt handling as ATF is not preemptible. This problem can be solved by making ATF preemptible, similar to how OP-TEE does it by by implementing a remote procedural call after it receives a interrupt. [2]How Linux does SMC call with YIELD flag enabled. [3]How OP-TEE handles the timer interrupt [4]How Linux receives an interrupt which came in EL3->SEL1 As quoted in exception Handling document in ATF docs[5] "Receive exceptions, but handle part of the exception in EL3, and delegate processing of the error to dedicated software stack running at lower secure ELs (as above); additionally, the Normal world may also be required to participate in the handling, or be notified of such events (for example, as an event). In this scheme, exception handling potentially and maximally spans all ELs in both Secure and Normal worlds." From this we can understand that we can delegate the exception to EL1 if we are already in EL3. (way to preempt) We are aware that ARM v8.4-A onwards arch are having a SEL2 level with which we can run a vendor specific firmware parallel to TEE at SEL1 in a secure partition. But how we do handle clock and power management for version which doesn't support SEL2? We don't want to put it in TEE as it will constraint our devices to that specific TEE. I am starting to work on a proposal to make ATF preemptible similar to how OP-TEE is doing it. a)Will the similar approach from OP-TEE if implemented and working be accepted by ATF upstream? The SMC call with YIELD option will only be preemtible so will not affect the normal flow. b)As quoted in Trusted Firmware-A Document[6] Page 94, "Yielding calls are reserved exclusively for Trusted OS providers" "Yielding 0- 1 Reserved for existing Armv7-A calls Yielding 2-63 Trusted OS Standard Calls" Can this range be consumed within ATF/bl31 firmware or is it necessary to forward all yielding calls to Trusted OS? [0]https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/plat/st/… [1]https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/21840 [2]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc3/source/drivers/tee/optee/smc_ab… [3]https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/fc57019cb35c8c1bad66fc6d814ace5de… [4]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc3/source/drivers/tee/optee/smc_ab… [5]https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/docs/com… [6]https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/_/downloads/en/latest/pdf/ Regards, Kamlesh

1 year, 5 months

6
10
0 0

Changelog for v2.11 Release

by Juan Pablo Conde

Hello everyone, Please take a look at the changelog for your respective platforms ahead of the TF-A v2.11 release. The changelog is autogenerated from the commit messages of the patches that have been merged since the v2.10 release. Here's your chance to give us guidance on any small manual adjustments you would like to see. Patch: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/28891 Rendered Version: https://ci-builds.trustedfirmware.org/static-files/M6zhCYgGrsu6KLmMu2AdTlI2… Thanks, Juan Pablo

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

documentation - secure interrupt handling in EL3 for arm gic v2

by Nagal, Amit

Hi , There is a contradiction present in TF-A documentation whether secure interrupts can be handled in EL3 for arm gic v2 case . 1. Referring https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/design/interrupt-framewo… It says secure interrupts can't be handled in EL3 . Refer statement : "In Arm GICv2, all secure interrupts are assumed to be handled in Secure-EL1. They can be delivered to Secure-EL1 via EL3 but they cannot be handled in EL3." 2. Referring https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/components/platform-inte… It says secure interrupts can be handled in EL3 , When GICV2_G0_FOR_EL3 is 1 . Refer below statements : For interrupt type INTR_TYPE_EL3: When GICV2_G0_FOR_EL3 is 0, it returns false, indicating no support for EL3 interrupts. When GICV2_G0_FOR_EL3 is 1, it returns true, indicating support for EL3 interrupts. can this be clarified ? Regards Amit

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.19 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.19 is now available. This release contains the following patches. 1e785ab6a feat(spmd): initialize SCR_EL3.EEL2 bit at RESET [1] 9d40eff24 fix(spmd): avoid restoring ctx during first entry into spmc [2] 02633263a fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A715 erratum 2728106 [3] 9b5d75b17 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2740089 [4] d0a74e38c fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X4 erratum 2763018 [5] 6c9135fb0 docs: decrease the minimum supported OpenSSL [6] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ia246235aa8d8004dcaf845f21c8aeeabbbbbe… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I368088ece60826fd7a6aa423ba584a89d32fc… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ic825f9942e7eb13893fdbb44a2090b897758c… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I1d0fa4dd383437044a4467591f65a4a8514ca… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ia188e08c2eb2952923ec72e2a56efdeea836f… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I5c60907337f10b05d5c43b0384247c5d4135d… Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu May 16, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+2) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling as no topic proposed this week. Thanks & Regards, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday May 16, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

Firmware-A v2.10 release code freeze notification

by Olivier Deprez

Hi All, The next release of the Firmware-A bundle of projects tagged v2.10 has an expected code freeze date of Nov, 7th 2023. Refer to the Release Cadence section from TF-A documentation (https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/tree/docs/about…). Closing out the release takes around 6-10 working days after the code freeze. Preparations tasks for v2.10 release should start in coming month. We want to ensure that planned feature patches for the release are submitted in good time for the review process to conclude. As a kind recommendation and a matter of sharing CI resources, please launch CI jobs with care e.g.: -For simple platform, docs changes, or one liners, use Allow-CI+1 label (no need for a full Allow-CI+2 run). -For large patch stacks use Allow-CI+2 at top of the patch stack (and if required few individual Allow+CI+1 in the middle of the patch stack). -Carefully analyze results and fix the change if required, before launching new jobs on the same change. -If after issuing a Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label a Build start notice is not added as a gerrit comment on the patch right away please be patient as under heavy load CI jobs can be queued and in extreme conditions it can be over an hour before the Build start notice is issued. Issuing another Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label will just result in an additional job being queued. Thanks & Regards, Olivier.

1 year, 5 months

1
3
0 0

FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT - FIEN bit

by Nagal, Amit

Hi, Referring https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/docs/getti… it says : ``FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT``: ARMv8.4 extensions introduced support for fault injection from lower Els. Referring https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/lib/el3_ru… FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT enables FIEN bit. #if FAULT_INJECTION_SUPPORT /* Enable fault injection from lower ELs */ scr_el3 |= SCR_FIEN_BIT; #endif Question : 1. Do we have any relevant documentation from arm which specifies FIEN bit can be enabled from armv8.4 ? 2. In cortex a-53 technical reference manual, SCR_EL3 does not have FIEN bit , bit 21 is marked reserved . In cortex a-78 technical reference manual , manual does not have details for SCR_EL3 . I want to know whether on Armv8.2-a based cores like cortex a-78 , is the FIEN bit field marked reserved in SCR_EL3 register or is available functionality wise as in armv8.4 ? Please help with above query. Regards Amit

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 2 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 14 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 2 of 2 defect(s) ** CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 133 in cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 133 in cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore() 127 void cluster_on_dsu_pmu_context_restore(void) 128 { 129 unsigned int cluster_pos; 130 131 cluster_pos = (unsigned int) plat_cluster_id_by_mpidr(read_mpidr_el1()); 132 >>> CID 425813: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> "&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]" evaluates to an address that is at byte offset 138720 of an array of 544 bytes. 133 restore_dsu_pmu_state(&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]); ** CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 81 in cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /drivers/arm/css/dsu/dsu.c: 81 in cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save() 75 void cluster_off_dsu_pmu_context_save(void) 76 { 77 unsigned int cluster_pos; 78 79 cluster_pos = (unsigned int) plat_cluster_id_by_mpidr(read_mpidr_el1()); 80 >>> CID 425812: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> "&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]" evaluates to an address that is at byte offset 138720 of an array of 544 bytes. 81 save_dsu_pmu_state(&cluster_pmu_context[cluster_pos]); 82 } 83 84 /***************************************************************************** 85 * This function, restore_dsu_pmu_state, restores the state of the 86 * Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) from a previously saved state. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 8 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /plat/nxp/s32/s32g274ardb2/plat_console.c: 17 in console_s32g2_register() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) /plat/nxp/s32/s32g274ardb2/plat_console.c: 17 in console_s32g2_register() 11 12 void console_s32g2_register(void) 13 { 14 static console_t s32g2_console; 15 int ret; 16 >>> CID 425810: High impact quality (WRITE_CONST_FIELD) >>> A write to an aggregate overwrites a const-qualified field within the aggregate. 17 (void)memset(&s32g2_console, 0, sizeof(s32g2_console)); 18 19 ret = console_linflex_register(UART_BASE, UART_CLOCK_HZ, 20 UART_BAUDRATE, &s32g2_console); 21 if (ret == 0) { 22 panic(); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 7 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 14 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 7 of 7 defect(s) ** CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 314 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 314 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() 308 } 309 310 exit: 311 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); 312 313 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { >>> CID 425803: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach this statement: "*plaintext_length = ciphert...". 314 *plaintext_length = ciphertext_length - operation.tag_length; 315 } 316 return status; 317 } 318 319 /* Set the key and algorithm for a multipart authenticated encryption ** CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/x509_crt.c: 2750 in x509_inet_pton_ipv6() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) /mbedtls/library/x509_crt.c: 2750 in x509_inet_pton_ipv6() 2744 MBEDTLS_PUT_UINT16_BE(group, addr, nonzero_groups); 2745 nonzero_groups++; 2746 if (*p == '\0') { 2747 break; 2748 } else if (*p == '.') { 2749 /* Don't accept IPv4 too early or late */ >>> CID 425802: Control flow issues (DEADCODE) >>> Execution cannot reach the expression "zero_group_start == -1" inside this statement: "if ((nonzero_groups == 0 &&...". 2750 if ((nonzero_groups == 0 && zero_group_start == -1) || 2751 nonzero_groups >= 7) { 2752 break; 2753 } 2754 2755 /* Walk back to prior ':', then parse as IPv4-mapped */ ** CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 306 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 306 in mbedtls_psa_aead_decrypt() 300 (void) additional_data; 301 (void) additional_data_length; 302 (void) plaintext; 303 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 304 } 305 >>> CID 425801: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *plain...". 306 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 307 *plaintext_length = ciphertext_length - operation.tag_length; 308 } 309 310 exit: 311 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); ** CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 612 in mbedtls_psa_aead_finish() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 612 in mbedtls_psa_aead_finish() 606 (void) tag_size; 607 (void) tag_length; 608 609 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 610 } 611 >>> CID 425800: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *ciphe...". 612 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 613 /* This will be zero for all supported algorithms currently, but left 614 * here for future support. */ 615 *ciphertext_length = finish_output_size; 616 *tag_length = operation->tag_length; 617 } ** CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 110 in psa_aead_setup() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 110 in psa_aead_setup() 104 default: 105 (void) status; 106 (void) key_buffer; 107 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 108 } 109 >>> CID 425799: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "operation->key_type = psa_g...". 110 operation->key_type = psa_get_key_type(attributes); 111 112 operation->tag_length = PSA_ALG_AEAD_GET_TAG_LENGTH(alg); 113 114 return PSA_SUCCESS; 115 } ** CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 541 in mbedtls_psa_aead_update() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 541 in mbedtls_psa_aead_update() 535 (void) output; 536 (void) output_size; 537 538 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 539 } 540 >>> CID 425798: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *outpu...". 541 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 542 *output_length = update_output_length; 543 } 544 545 return status; 546 } ** CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 196 in mbedtls_psa_aead_encrypt() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) /mbedtls/library/psa_crypto_aead.c: 196 in mbedtls_psa_aead_encrypt() 190 (void) additional_data; 191 (void) additional_data_length; 192 (void) plaintext; 193 return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED; 194 } 195 >>> CID 425797: Control flow issues (UNREACHABLE) >>> This code cannot be reached: "if (status == 0) { *ciphe...". 196 if (status == PSA_SUCCESS) { 197 *ciphertext_length = plaintext_length + operation.tag_length; 198 } 199 200 exit: 201 mbedtls_psa_aead_abort(&operation); ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 5 months

1
0
0 0

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

by scan-admin＠coverity.com

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. 1 new defect(s) introduced to ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) ** CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) /plat/xilinx/zynqmp/pm_service/zynqmp_pm_api_sys.c: 279 in pm_self_suspend() 273 const struct pm_proc *proc = pm_get_proc(cpuid); 274 275 /* 276 * Do client specific suspend operations 277 * (e.g. set powerdown request bit) 278 */ >>> CID 425708: Null pointer dereferences (NULL_RETURNS) >>> Dereferencing a pointer that might be "NULL" "proc" when calling "pm_client_suspend". 279 pm_client_suspend(proc, state); 280 /* Send request to the PMU */ 281 PM_PACK_PAYLOAD6(payload, PM_SELF_SUSPEND, proc->node_id, latency, 282 state, address, (address >> 32)); 283 return pm_ipi_send_sync(proc, payload, NULL, 0); 284 } ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.AxU2LYlgjL6eX23u9ErQy-2…

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum : TF-RMM CPPCheck integration and TF-A-Tests testing

by Soby Mathew

Hi Everyone, This Thursday , Shruti from TF-RMM team will discuss the following topics in TF-A Tech Forum : 1. Integration of CPPCheck in TF-RMM * CPPCheck is an open-source static analyzer with addon MISRA checker. In this talk, we will discuss the CPPCheck integration in TF-RMM build system and demonstrate the same. 2. TF-A-Tests enhancements and testing for TF-RMM * Discuss new enhancements in TF-A-Tests for Realm Payload tests including Creating, Loading & Running Realm Payload, testing multiple Rec’s and PSCI support for Realms. We will also cover some Test framework conventions and aspects of Stage2 Memory Management, Realm Memory Exception Model testing. Best Regards Soby Mathew -----Original Appointment----- From: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings <linaro.org_havjv2figrh5egaiurb229pd8c(a)group.calendar.google.com> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 10:13 PM To: Trusted Firmware Public Meetings; tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org; marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com; okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com Subject: TF-A Tech Forum When: 02 May 2024 16:00-17:00 Europe/London. Where: TF-A Tech Forum We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this This event has been updated with a note: "Updating invite link" Changed: description Description CHANGED We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.trustedfirmware.org%2Fmeetin…> Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvd…<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro-org.zoom.us%2Fmy%2Ftruste…> One tap mobile +16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York) +16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 915 970 4974 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fzoom.us%2Fu%2Fad27hc6t7h&sa=D&us…> When Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday (Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix) Guests tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com<mailto:marek.bykowski@gmail.com> okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com<mailto:okash.khawaja@gmail.com> View all guest info<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> RSVP for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org<mailto:tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org> for all events in this series Yes<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> No<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> Maybe<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tM…> More options<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1…> Invitation from Google Calendar<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/> You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more<https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.10.4 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.18 Release Announcement

by ci_notify＠trustedfirmware.org

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.18 is now available. This release contains the following patches. a1cb5f656 feat(mbedtls): upgrade to version v2.28.8 [1] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ic1e6debbfc0f5667a8872482ccfb104c1a92e… Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Need a mechanism to easily define platform-independent SMC FIDs

by Julius Werner

Hi, I would like to restart a discussion that we already had a few years ago on a thread called "SMC to intentionally trigger a panic in TF-A" (https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/search?mlist=tf-a%40lists.truste…) but that petered out without any real resolution (and resulted in me ultimately not implementing the feature I was hoping to add). Basically, we are repeatedly stumbling over the problem that we have a use case for some platform-independent SMC API that we want to implement in TF-A, but don't have an appropriate SMC FID range to put it. My request from a few years ago was about implementing a call to intentionally trigger a panic in TF-A for test-automation purposes. Today we came up with a use case where a Trusted OS wants to query BL31 about the location of a shared log buffer: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/20478 . Currently, the available SMC ranges are Arm, CPU, SiP, OEM, Standard, Hypervisor, TA and TOS. The SiP, OEM and TOS ranges are all specific to a single silicon vendor, OEM or trusted OS implementation, so they are not good targets to implement APIs that would make sense to be shared among multiple of these. In theory, the Standard range would probably be the right target to implement calls that are independently useful for multiple platforms / OSes... but as far as I understand, adding a new call to that range requires petitioning Arm to update the SMC calling convention itself, which is a ridiculously high bar to implement a small utility API. In practice, the only choice we have for implementing these kinds of calls is to let every OEM, SiP or TOS assign its own (different) FID for it and then write separate SMC handlers for each in TF-A that all end up calling the same underlying function... which creates a lot of unnecessary code duplication and identifier soup (especially in the case of SMCs for the non-secure OS which would then be implemented by a platform-independent Linux driver that needs a big mapping table to decide which FID to use on which platform for the same API). I think it would be very useful if there was another range of easily allocatable FIDs that developers could just add to with a simple TF-A CL without having to go through a huge specification update process. There are still 41 OENs unused in the Arm SMCCC, and I don't think any new ones were added in the 10 years that the specification existed... so we are really not going to run out of them any time soon. If we could get even one of those OENs for this purpose, we would have 64K FIDs to use up for our small, simple platform-independent API needs, which should last us a long while. We could maybe call it the "Secure Monitor range" and say the FIDs are specific to a certain implementation of Secure Monitor (e.g. TF-A). Then there could just be a header file in the TF-A sources that serves as the authoritative FID assignment table for TF-A, and anyone with a sufficiently useful idea (subject to TF-A maintainer review) for a platform-independent API like this could add it there by just uploading a patch. I recently argued for a similar "simple tag allocation" concept on https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff and it found support there, so I hope I'll be able to convince you that it would be useful for SMC FIDs as well?

1 year, 6 months

3
3
0 0

Re: rk3399 issue: no DMA in Linux with mainline TF-A and U-Boot SPL

by Christoph Fritz

Hello Jonathan and Kevar, > I also see this issue when switching between Rockchip ATF and Upstream ATF. > > Versions: > Rockchip DDR Blob - rk3399_ddr_800MHz_v1.30.bin > Rockchip Miniloader - rk3399_miniloader_v1.30.bin > Rockchip ATF - rk3399_bl31_v1.36.elf > Upstream ATF - git://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git, > git tag v2.8.0, with RK3399_BAUDRATE changed from 115200 to 1500000 in > plat/rockchip/rk3399/rk3399_def.h > U-Boot - git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, git tag v2022.01 > > Results: > Rockchip DDR Blob + Rockchip Miniloader + Rockchip ATF + U-Boot = DMA working > dma-pl330 ff6d0000.dma-controller: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330 > dma-pl330 ff6d0000.dma-controller: DBUFF-32x8bytes Num_Chans-6 > Num_Peri-12 Num_Events-12 > dma-pl330 ff6e0000.dma-controller: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330 > dma-pl330 ff6e0000.dma-controller: DBUFF-128x8bytes > Num_Chans-8 Num_Peri-20 Num_Events-16 > Rockchip DDR Blob + Rockchip Miniloader + Upstream ATF + U-Boot = DMA > not working > OF: amba_device_add() failed (-19) for /bus/dma-controller@ff6d0000 > OF: amba_device_add() failed (-19) for /bus/dma-controller@ff6e0000 > > I can't check the Rockchip ATF source code as it isn't available. > Any idea what is different between Rockchip ATF and Upstream ATF for > DMA to work properly? @Kevar: It would be really great if you could have a look into it. I am still having this issue. Thanks -- Christoph

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

About unmaintained files

by Yann Gautier

Hello, Recently I wondered who was the Code-Owner of the files in this patch: fix(pmu): fix breakage on ARMv7 CPUs with SP_min as BL32 (https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/27162) By the way it still doesn't have the Code-Owner review vote ;-) But that triggered a more generic question about files and directories in docs/about/maintainers.rst: are all the paths listed here reflect all the files in TF-A repository? The answer is unfortunately no. I've then ended up writing some shell commands to try to list unmaintained files: for p in $(grep ^':|F|' docs/about/maintainers.rst | cut -d" " -f2 | grep ^[a-zA-Z] | grep -v "drivers/nuvoton" | sed "s;\\\;;g"); do find $p -type f >> /tmp/find_tf-a_maintained_files.txt; done; sort -u -o /tmp/find_tf-a_maintained_files.txt{,}; git ls-files | sort -u > /tmp/tf-a_files.txt; diff /tmp/find_tf-a_maintained_files.txt /tmp/tf-a_files.txt > /tmp/tf-a_unmaintained_files.txt Some are easy to correct, e.g. some docs/plat/<platform> files should be added to the list of files for a given <platform>. Or some include/drivers paths missing. I may push some patches for this if I can. The drivers/nuvoton path is listed but it doesn't exist. Some platforms or drivers are completely missing, and that would be good their maintainers add a chapter for them. But some generic & core files are also not listed. The goal of this mail is to open the discussion about that. That could be tricky as maintainer may change. But all of that would ease the contributors way of working. I've also seen that gerrit automatically adds Code-Owner for the review. So it seems there is another list for that, and we could somehow try to align those 2 lists. Best regards, Yann

1 year, 6 months

3
2
0 0

Build failure under yocto

by Ryan Eatmon

We do nightly testing of our yocto layers against the latest kernel, uboot, trusted-firmware-a, and optee. On April 12th we started getting a build failure with trusted-firmware-a. I have tracked the issue down to this commit: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/71c42e98bbe900a… Specifically, the line in make_helpers/utilities.mk: escape-shell = '$(subst ','\'',$(1))' On the surface it feels like the ' is overused and might cause issues. I tried making the line: escape-shell = $(subst ','\'',$(1)) And the builds went back to working properly. Does that seem like a change that should be made, or was there a reason for the extra '' wrapper? I have submitted a GitHub issue about this as well: https://github.com/TrustedFirmware-A/trusted-firmware-a/issues/7 -- Ryan Eatmon reatmon(a)ti.com ----------------------------------------- Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

gicv2.h vs gicv3.h conflict

by Jacob Kroon

Hi, I'm upgrading the ATF I use from 2.4 to 2.8, and ran into a header conflict. The change https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/13806 introduced an inclusion of include/drivers/arm/gicv3.h in lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c, but in my build environment that .c file also includes include/drivers/arm/gicv2.h so now I get macro redefinition of "INT_ID_MASK" errors when compiling. Is it an error, that in my build environment the gicv2.h gets included ? I've solved it locally by doing: diff --git a/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c b/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c index 866ac4154..395635a86 100644 --- a/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c +++ b/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ #include <common/bl_common.h> #include <common/debug.h> #include <context.h> +#if CTX_INCLUDE_EL2_REGS #include <drivers/arm/gicv3.h> +#endif #include <lib/el3_runtime/context_mgmt.h> #include <lib/el3_runtime/pubsub_events.h> #include <lib/extensions/amu.h> but I am not sure whether this is the correct fix or not, or if I am doing something else wrong here. Any suggestions on what would be the correct fix ? Regards Jacob

1 year, 6 months

2
2
0 0

Reminder: TrustedFirmware Discord Channel

by don.harbin＠linaro.org

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A