Hello arm-soc maintainers,
Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.
Thanks, Jens
The following changes since commit 3cea11cd5e3b00d91caf0b4730194039b45c5891:
Linux 5.10-rc2 (2020-11-01 14:43:51 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/optee-valid-memory-type-for-v5.11
for you to fetch changes up to 853735e404244f5496cdb6188c5ed9a0f9627ee6:
optee: add writeback to valid memory type (2020-11-25 12:51:52 +0100)
---------------------------------------------------------------- Add writeback to valid OP-TEE shared memory types
Allows OP-TEE to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems by allowing writeback cache policy for shared memory.
---------------------------------------------------------------- Rui Miguel Silva (1): optee: add writeback to valid memory type
drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
Hello arm-soc maintainers,
Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.
Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.
For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.
Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request in addition to linux-kernel.
Arnd
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00 PM Arnd Bergmann arnd@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
Hello arm-soc maintainers,
Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.
Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.
For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.
Yes it is a bit of a bugfix, so if you don't mind taking it as that I'm sure that Rui would be happy to get it in this release.
Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request in addition to linux-kernel.
I'll keep that in mind the next time. Thanks for the feedback.
Cheers, Jens
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org