Data rates of MAX_UINT32 will schedule an unnecessary one jiffy timeout on the call to msleep. Avoid this scenario by using 0 as the unlimited data rate.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz jorge@foundries.io --- drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c index 49b2e02537dd..5bc4700c4dae 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int optee_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait) data += rng_size; read += rng_size;
- if (wait) { + if (wait && pvt_data->data_rate) { if (timeout-- == 0) return read; msleep((1000 * (max - read)) / pvt_data->data_rate);
The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a second read. However the second read would not be executed as the while loop exits.
This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second time if only partial data was retrieved on the first read.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz jorge@foundries.io --- drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c index 5bc4700c4dae..967d58bb9fda 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c @@ -122,13 +122,15 @@ static int optee_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait) if (max > MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ) max = MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ;
- while (read == 0) { + for (;;) { rng_size = get_optee_rng_data(pvt_data, data, (max - read));
data += rng_size; read += rng_size;
if (wait && pvt_data->data_rate) { + if (read == max) + return read; if (timeout-- == 0) return read; msleep((1000 * (max - read)) / pvt_data->data_rate);
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org