On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 07:58 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
We're also complaining about the inability to recruit maintainers:
And burn out:
What I'm actually trying to articulate is a way of measuring value of the patch vs cost ... it has nothing really to do with who foots the actual bill.
It's unclear how to measure value in consistency.
But one way that costs can be reduced is by automation and _not_ involving maintainers when the patch itself is provably correct.
One thesis I'm actually starting to formulate is that this continual devaluing of maintainers is why we have so much difficulty keeping and recruiting them.
The linux kernel has something like 1500 different maintainers listed in the MAINTAINERS file. That's not a trivial number.
$ git grep '^M:' MAINTAINERS | sort | uniq -c | wc -l 1543 $ git grep '^M:' MAINTAINERS| cut -f1 -d'<' | sort | uniq -c | wc -l 1446
I think the question you are asking is about trust and how it effects development.
And back to that wired story, the actual number of what you might be considering to be maintainers is likely less than 10% of the listed numbers above.