- OP-TEE - lists.trustedfirmware.org

[PATCH v2 0/8] Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE)

by Amirreza Zarrabi

This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs) and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services. Kernel and userspace services are also available to QTEE through a similar approach. QTEE makes callback requests that are converted into object invocations. These objects can represent services within the kernel or userspace process. Note: This patch series focuses on QTEE objects and userspace services. Linux already provides a TEE subsystem, which is described in [1]. The tee subsystem provides a generic ioctl interface, TEE_IOC_INVOKE, which can be used by userspace to talk to a TEE backend driver. We extend the Linux TEE subsystem to understand object parameters and an ioctl call so client can invoke objects in QTEE: - TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF_* - TEE_IOC_OBJECT_INVOKE The existing ioctl calls TEE_IOC_SUPPL_RECV and TEE_IOC_SUPPL_SEND are used for invoking services in the userspace process by QTEE. The TEE backend driver uses the QTEE Transport Message to communicate with QTEE. Interactions through the object INVOKE interface are translated into QTEE messages. Likewise, object invocations from QTEE for userspace objects are converted into SEND/RECV ioctl calls to supplicants. The details of QTEE Transport Message to communicate with QTEE is available in [PATCH 10/10] Documentation: tee: Add Qualcomm TEE driver. You can run basic tests with following steps: git clone https://github.com/quic/quic-teec.git cd quic-teec mkdir build cmake .. -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=CMakeToolchain.txt -DBUILD_UNITTEST=ON https://github.com/quic/quic-teec/blob/main/README.md lists dependancies needed to build the above. This series has been tested for basic QTEE object invocations and callback requests, including loading a TA and requesting services form the TA. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/tee.txt Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi(a)quicinc.com> --- Changes in v2: - Clean up commit messages and comments. - Use better names such as ubuf instead of membuf or QCOMTEE prefix instead of QCOM_TEE, or names that are more consistent with other TEE-backend drivers such as qcomtee_context_data instead of qcom_tee_context. - Drop the DTS patch and instantiate the device from the scm driver. - Use a single structure for all driver's internal states. - Drop srcu primitives and use the existing mutex for synchronization between the supplicant and QTEE. - Directly use tee_context to track the lifetime of qcomtee_context_data. - Add close_context() to be called when the user closes the tee_context. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-v1… Changes in v1: - It is a complete rewrite to utilize the TEE subsystem. - Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240702-qcom-tee-object-and-ioctls-v1-0-633c3d… --- Amirreza Zarrabi (8): tee: allow a driver to allocate a tee_device without a pool tee: add close_context to TEE driver operation tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF firmware: qcom: scm: add support for object invocation tee: add Qualcomm TEE driver qcomtee: add primordial object Documentation: tee: Add Qualcomm TEE driver Documentation/tee/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/tee/qtee.rst | 150 ++++++ drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 128 ++++++ drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 7 + drivers/tee/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/Makefile | 10 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/async.c | 160 +++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/call.c | 741 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c | 810 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/primordial_obj.c | 65 +++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_msg.h | 234 ++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_private.h | 226 +++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/release.c | 59 +++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/shm.c | 102 +++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/user_obj.c | 712 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 121 ++++- drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 6 - include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 27 ++ include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_tee.h | 286 ++++++++++++ include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 +- include/linux/tee_drv.h | 18 + include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 54 ++- 25 files changed, 3964 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) --- base-commit: dab2734f8e9ecba609d66d1dd087a392a7774c04 change-id: 20241202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-362c66340527 Best regards, -- Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi(a)quicinc.com>

1 month

5
24
0 0

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: .mailmap: Update Sumit Garg's email address

by Sumit Garg

Update Sumit Garg's email address to @kernel.org. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> --- .mailmap | 1 + MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap index a897c16d3bae..4a93909286d8 100644 --- a/.mailmap +++ b/.mailmap @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram(a)quicinc.com> <subbaram(a)codeaurora.org> Subhash Jadavani <subhashj(a)codeaurora.org> Sudarshan Rajagopalan <quic_sudaraja(a)quicinc.com> <sudaraja(a)codeaurora.org> Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla(a)arm.com> Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha(a)arm.com> +Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal(a)ti.com> Surabhi Vishnoi <quic_svishnoi(a)quicinc.com> <svishnoi(a)codeaurora.org> Sven Eckelmann <sven(a)narfation.org> <seckelmann(a)datto.com> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1b0cc181db74..616f859c5f92 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -12861,7 +12861,7 @@ F: include/keys/trusted_dcp.h F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_dcp.c KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE -M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: linux-integrity(a)vger.kernel.org L: keyrings(a)vger.kernel.org S: Supported @@ -17661,7 +17661,7 @@ F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices F: drivers/tee/optee/ OP-TEE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR (RNG) DRIVER -M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: op-tee(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org S: Maintained F: drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c @@ -23272,7 +23272,7 @@ F: include/media/i2c/tw9910.h TEE SUBSYSTEM M: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> -R: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +R: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: op-tee(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org S: Maintained F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee -- 2.43.0

1 month

1
0
0 0

Linaro OP-TEE Contribution, LOC, monthly meeting February 25

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, Tomorrow, Tuesday, it's time for another LOC monthly meeting. For time and connection details see the calendar at https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/ I recently posted a new version of the Restricted DMA-buf patch set [1], and there's also an ongoing discussion that already started on the previous version of the patch set [2]. We're discussing whether the restricted DMA-bufs should be allocated from DMA heaps or the TEE subsystem. Both approaches work, but we need to decide on one for the patch set to move forward. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250218143527.1236668-1-jens.wiklander@linaro… [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241217100809.3962439-1-jens.wiklander@linaro… Are there any other topics? Cheers, Jens

1 month, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v5 0/7] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, [Now with a Gstreamer demo, see below.] This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs via the TEE subsystem. The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE (OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or perhaps a future QCOMTEE) which sets up the restrictions for the memory used for the DMA-bufs. I've added a new IOCTL, TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC, to allocate the restricted DMA-bufs. This IOCTL reaches the backend TEE driver, allowing it to choose how to allocate the restricted physical memory. TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC takes in addition to a size and flags parameters also a use-case parameter. This is used by the backend TEE driver to decide on allocation policy and which devices should be able to access the memory. Three use-cases (Secure Video Playback, Trusted UI, and Secure Video Recording) has been identified so far to serve as examples of what can be expected. More use-cases can be added in userspace ABI, but it's up to the backend TEE drivers to provide the implementation. Each use-case has it's own restricted memory pool since different use-cases requires isolation from different parts of the system. A restricted memory pool can be based on a static carveout instantiated while probing the TEE backend driver, or dynamically allocated from CMA and made restricted as needed by the TEE. This can be tested on a RockPi 4B+ with the following steps: repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m rockpi4.xml \ -b prototype/sdp-v5 repo sync -j8 cd build make toolchains -j$(nproc) make all -j$(nproc) # Copy ../out/rockpi4.img to an SD card and boot the RockPi from that # Connect a monitor to the RockPi # login and at the prompt: gst-launch-1.0 videotestsrc ! \ aesenc key=1f9423681beb9a79215820f6bda73d0f \ iv=e9aa8e834d8d70b7e0d254ff670dd718 serialize-iv=true ! \ aesdec key=1f9423681beb9a79215820f6bda73d0f ! \ kmssink The aesdec module has been hacked to use an OP-TEE TA to decrypt the stream into restricted DMA-bufs which are consumed by the kmssink. The primitive QEMU tests from previous patch set can be tested on RockPi in the same way with: xtest --sdp-basic The primitive test are tested on QEMU with the following steps: repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \ -b prototype/sdp-v5 repo sync -j8 cd build make toolchains -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 all -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 run-only # login and at the prompt: xtest --sdp-basic The SPMC_AT_EL=1 parameter configures the build with FF-A and an SPMC at S-EL1 inside OP-TEE. The parameter can be changed into SPMC_AT_EL=n to test without FF-A using the original SMC ABI instead. Please remember to do %rm -rf ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu for TF-A to be rebuilt properly using the new configuration. https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html list dependencies needed to build the above. The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc. Thanks, Jens Changes since V4: * Adding the patch "tee: add TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_FD_INFO" needed by the GStreamer demo * Removing the dummy CPU access and mmap functions from the dma_buf_ops * Fixing a compile error in "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" reported by kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Changes since V3: * Make the use_case and flags field in struct tee_shm u32's instead of u16's * Add more description for TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC in the header file * Import namespace DMA_BUF in module tee, reported by lkp(a)intel.com * Added a note in the commit message for "optee: account for direction while converting parameters" why it's needed * Factor out dynamic restricted memory allocation from "optee: support restricted memory allocation" into two new commits "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" and "optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation" * Guard CMA usage with #ifdef CONFIG_CMA, effectively disabling dynamic restricted memory allocate if CMA isn't configured Changes since the V2 RFC: * Based on v6.12 * Replaced the flags for SVP and Trusted UID memory with a u32 field with unique id for each use case * Added dynamic allocation of restricted memory pools * Added OP-TEE ABI both with and without FF-A for dynamic restricted memory * Added support for FF-A with FFA_LEND Changes since the V1 RFC: * Based on v6.11 * Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC Changes since Olivier's post [2]: * Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in the generic restricted heap * Simplifications and cleanup * New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap support" * Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable Jens Wiklander (7): tee: add restricted memory allocation tee: add TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_FD_INFO optee: account for direction while converting parameters optee: sync secure world ABI headers optee: support restricted memory allocation optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 10 +- drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 179 +++++++++++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 27 ++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_msg.h | 65 ++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 75 ++++-- drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 71 +++++- drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++- drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c | 389 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 215 +++++++++++++++-- drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 69 +++++- drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 4 + drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c | 188 +++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 2 + drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c | 69 +++++- include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 ++ include/linux/tee_drv.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 71 +++++- 20 files changed, 1409 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c base-commit: a64dcfb451e254085a7daee5fe51bf22959d52d3 -- 2.43.0

1 month, 2 weeks

2
8
0 0

[PATCH v3] tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop

by Sumit Garg

OP-TEE supplicant is a user-space daemon and it's possible for it be hung or crashed or killed in the middle of processing an OP-TEE RPC call. It becomes more complicated when there is incorrect shutdown ordering of the supplicant process vs the OP-TEE client application which can eventually lead to system hang-up waiting for the closure of the client application. Allow the client process waiting in kernel for supplicant response to be killed rather than indefinitely waiting in an unkillable state. Also, a normal uninterruptible wait should not have resulted in the hung-task watchdog getting triggered, but the endless loop would. This fixes issues observed during system reboot/shutdown when supplicant got hung for some reason or gets crashed/killed which lead to client getting hung in an unkillable state. It in turn lead to system being in hung up state requiring hard power off/on to recover. Fixes: 4fb0a5eb364d ("tee: add OP-TEE driver") Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> --- Changes in v3: - Use mutex_lock() instead of mutex_lock_killable(). - Update commit message to incorporate Arnd's feedback. Changes in v2: - Switch to killable wait instead as suggested by Arnd instead of supplicant timeout. It atleast allow the client to wait for supplicant in killable state which in turn allows system to reboot or shutdown gracefully. drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 35 ++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c index 322a543b8c27..d0f397c90242 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev); struct optee_supp *supp = &optee->supp; struct optee_supp_req *req; - bool interruptable; u32 ret; /* @@ -111,36 +110,18 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, /* * Wait for supplicant to process and return result, once we've * returned from wait_for_completion(&req->c) successfully we have - * exclusive access again. + * exclusive access again. Allow the wait to be killable such that + * the wait doesn't turn into an indefinite state if the supplicant + * gets hung for some reason. */ - while (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&req->c)) { + if (wait_for_completion_killable(&req->c)) { mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); - interruptable = !supp->ctx; - if (interruptable) { - /* - * There's no supplicant available and since the - * supp->mutex currently is held none can - * become available until the mutex released - * again. - * - * Interrupting an RPC to supplicant is only - * allowed as a way of slightly improving the user - * experience in case the supplicant hasn't been - * started yet. During normal operation the supplicant - * will serve all requests in a timely manner and - * interrupting then wouldn't make sense. - */ - if (req->in_queue) { - list_del(&req->link); - req->in_queue = false; - } + if (req->in_queue) { + list_del(&req->link); + req->in_queue = false; } mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); - - if (interruptable) { - req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; - break; - } + req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; } ret = req->ret; -- 2.43.0

1 month, 4 weeks

3
2
0 0

[PATCH v2] tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop

by Sumit Garg

OP-TEE supplicant is a user-space daemon and it's possible for it being hung or crashed or killed in the middle of processing an OP-TEE RPC call. It becomes more complicated when there is incorrect shutdown ordering of the supplicant process vs the OP-TEE client application which can eventually lead to system hang-up waiting for the closure of the client application. Allow the client process waiting in kernel for supplicant response to be killed rather than indefinitetly waiting in an unkillable state. This fixes issues observed during system reboot/shutdown when supplicant got hung for some reason or gets crashed/killed which lead to client getting hung in an unkillable state. It in turn lead to system being in hung up state requiring hard power off/on to recover. Fixes: 4fb0a5eb364d ("tee: add OP-TEE driver") Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> --- Changes in v2: - Switch to killable wait instead as suggested by Arnd instead of supplicant timeout. It atleast allow the client to wait for supplicant in killable state which in turn allows system to reboot or shutdown gracefully. drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 32 +++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c index 322a543b8c27..3fbfa9751931 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev); struct optee_supp *supp = &optee->supp; struct optee_supp_req *req; - bool interruptable; u32 ret; /* @@ -111,36 +110,19 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, /* * Wait for supplicant to process and return result, once we've * returned from wait_for_completion(&req->c) successfully we have - * exclusive access again. + * exclusive access again. Allow the wait to be killable such that + * the wait doesn't turn into an indefinite state if the supplicant + * gets hung for some reason. */ - while (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&req->c)) { - mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); - interruptable = !supp->ctx; - if (interruptable) { - /* - * There's no supplicant available and since the - * supp->mutex currently is held none can - * become available until the mutex released - * again. - * - * Interrupting an RPC to supplicant is only - * allowed as a way of slightly improving the user - * experience in case the supplicant hasn't been - * started yet. During normal operation the supplicant - * will serve all requests in a timely manner and - * interrupting then wouldn't make sense. - */ + if (wait_for_completion_killable(&req->c)) { + if (!mutex_lock_killable(&supp->mutex)) { if (req->in_queue) { list_del(&req->link); req->in_queue = false; } + mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); } - mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); - - if (interruptable) { - req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; - break; - } + req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; } ret = req->ret; -- 2.43.0

2 months

3
5
0 0

[PATCH] tee: optee: Add support for supplicant timeout

by Sumit Garg

OP-TEE supplicant is a user-space daemon and it's possible for it being crashed or killed in the middle of processing an OP-TEE RPC call. It becomes more complicated when there is incorrect shutdown ordering of the supplicant process vs the OP-TEE client application which can eventually lead to system hang-up waiting for the closure of the client application. In order to gracefully handle this scenario, let's add a long enough timeout to wait for supplicant to process requests. In case there is a timeout then we return a proper error code for the RPC request. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> --- drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c index 322a543b8c27..92e86ac4cdd4 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include "optee_private.h" +/* + * OP-TEE supplicant timeout, the user-space supplicant may get + * crashed or killed while servicing an RPC call. This will just lead + * to OP-TEE client hung indefinitely just waiting for supplicant to + * serve requests which isn't expected. It is rather expected to fail + * gracefully with a timeout which is long enough. + */ +#define SUPP_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(10000)) + struct optee_supp_req { struct list_head link; @@ -52,8 +61,10 @@ void optee_supp_release(struct optee_supp *supp) /* Abort all queued requests */ list_for_each_entry_safe(req, req_tmp, &supp->reqs, link) { - list_del(&req->link); - req->in_queue = false; + if (req->in_queue) { + list_del(&req->link); + req->in_queue = false; + } req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; complete(&req->c); } @@ -82,6 +93,7 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, struct optee_supp_req *req; bool interruptable; u32 ret; + int res = 1; /* * Return in case there is no supplicant available and @@ -108,28 +120,28 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, /* Tell an eventual waiter there's a new request */ complete(&supp->reqs_c); - /* - * Wait for supplicant to process and return result, once we've - * returned from wait_for_completion(&req->c) successfully we have - * exclusive access again. - */ - while (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&req->c)) { + /* Wait for supplicant to process and return result */ + while (res) { + res = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&req->c, + SUPP_TIMEOUT); + /* Check if supplicant served the request */ + if (res > 0) + break; + mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); + /* + * There's no supplicant available and since the supp->mutex + * currently is held none can become available until the mutex + * released again. + * + * Interrupting an RPC to supplicant is only allowed as a way + * of slightly improving the user experience in case the + * supplicant hasn't been started yet. During normal operation + * the supplicant will serve all requests in a timely manner and + * interrupting then wouldn't make sense. + */ interruptable = !supp->ctx; - if (interruptable) { - /* - * There's no supplicant available and since the - * supp->mutex currently is held none can - * become available until the mutex released - * again. - * - * Interrupting an RPC to supplicant is only - * allowed as a way of slightly improving the user - * experience in case the supplicant hasn't been - * started yet. During normal operation the supplicant - * will serve all requests in a timely manner and - * interrupting then wouldn't make sense. - */ + if (interruptable || (res == 0)) { if (req->in_queue) { list_del(&req->link); req->in_queue = false; @@ -141,6 +153,8 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; break; } + if (res == 0) + req->ret = TEE_ERROR_TIMEOUT; } ret = req->ret; -- 2.43.0

2 months

3
17
0 0

Registering dynamic shared memory

by Patryk

Hi, I have some problems configuring dynamic shared memory on my platform, and thought that perhaps somebody could give me a hint. My SoC (LS1028A, board: LS1028A-RDB), according to reference manual has two DRAM regions: - DRAM region 0 : start address: 0x80000000, size: 0x80000000 - DRAM region 2: start address: 0x2080000000, size: 0x1F80000000 I tried two approaches: 1) In optee-os, in a part of code that handles my SoC I added a call to register DDR only for the first region: register_addr(0x80000000, 2G - some size for TZ DRAM) (similarly like in case of other SoCs) However when the system boots up, the optee driver logs the following information: [ 5.703831] optee: dynamic shared memory is enabled E/TC:0 0 std_entry_with_parg:234 Bad arg address 0x208100e000 It seems that there is some problem with an address that the driver wants to use 2) Apart from registering first region I also added a call that registers the second region so I ended up with two calls: register_addr(0x80000000, 2G - some size for TZ DRAM) register_ddr(0x2080000000, 0x1F80000000); Now the problem is different since the platform no longer boots, due to the panic with the following output: D/TC:0 0 discover_nsec_memory:1117 No non-secure memory found in external DT D/TC:0 0 carve_out_phys_mem:362 No need to carve out 0xfc000000 size 0x3e00000 D/TC:0 0 carve_out_phys_mem:362 No need to carve out 0xffe00000 size 0x200000 E/TC:0 0 Panic at /usr/src/debug/optee-os-qoriq/4.2.0+git/core/mm/core_mmu.c:490 <core_mmu_set_discovered_nsec_ddr> I'm wondering, what am I missing? Do I need to register both regions? If so, why does the optee panic when the second region gets registered? I would be grateful for some ideas. Best regards Patryk

2 months

2
2
0 0

Linaro OP-TEE Contribution, LOC, monthly meeting January 28

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, Tomorrow, Tuesday, it's time for another LOC monthly meeting. For time and connection details see the calendar at https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/ The TA-specific parts of fTPM have now been included in the first OP-TEE release in the optee_ftpm and we run fTPM in the OP-TEE OS CI loop at Github. Much of what we set out to do over half a year ago has been done, but there are some issues with the quality of the code. It doesn't compile without warnings and the coding style is inconsistent with the normal OP-TEE coding style (or anything else). Let's discuss how we can improve the status. Are there any other topics? Thanks, Jens

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

libtomcrypt, AES-CTR: Missing counter-increment for non-crypto-accelerated archs?

by Jork Loeser (he/him)

(Please provide a better way of reporting should this ML not be a good forum for bug-reports/fixes) Hello all, While experimenting with OP-TEE OS on a non-ARM platform (x86, to be precise), I noticed xtest regression_4003 and regression_4017 to be failing. It appears that for AES-CTR encrypt/decrypt, optee_os/core/lib/libtomcrypt/src/modes/ctr/ctr_encrypt.c:s_ctr_encrypt()<https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/37de1791d97d0df56db0709b5d001f82159…> fails to increment the counter on block boundaries when passed data covers a whole block. I suppose that it is a non-problem for architectures having crypto acceleration hooked up, since ctr_encrypt() bypasses s_ctr_encrypt() in that case. The below fixes the behavior for my setup - xtest regression_4003 and regression_4017 pass as a result: diff --git a/core/lib/libtomcrypt/src/modes/ctr/ctr_encrypt.c b/core/lib/libtomcrypt/src/modes/ctr/ctr_encrypt.c index a23e33c05..2019de2b6 100644 --- a/core/lib/libtomcrypt/src/modes/ctr/ctr_encrypt.c +++ b/core/lib/libtomcrypt/src/modes/ctr/ctr_encrypt.c @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int s_ctr_encrypt(const unsigned char *pt, unsigned char *ct, unsigned lo ct += ctr->blocklen; len -= ctr->blocklen; ctr->padlen = ctr->blocklen; + s_ctr_increment_counter(ctr); continue; } #endif I understand that you might prefer a full PR instead. Please accept my apologies for not providing such at this time; perhaps one of the maintainers (Jerome Forissier?) can take the above into consideration instead. If in doubt, consider above change as BSD-2-Clause'd. Best, Jork Loeser, Microsoft

2 months, 1 week

2
4
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

OP-TEE