- OP-TEE - lists.trustedfirmware.org

[PATCH v6 00/10] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs from a DMA-heap instantiated from the TEE subsystem. The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE (OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or perhaps a future QTEE) which sets up the restrictions for the memory used for the DMA-bufs. The DMA-heap uses a restricted memory pool provided by the backend TEE driver, allowing it to choose how to allocate the restricted physical memory. The allocated DMA-bufs must be imported with a new TEE_IOC_SHM_REGISTER_FD before they can be passed as arguments when requesting services from the secure world. Three use-cases (Secure Video Playback, Trusted UI, and Secure Video Recording) has been identified so far to serve as examples of what can be expected. The use-cases has predefined DMA-heap names, "restricted,secure-video", "restricted,trusted-ui", and "restricted,secure-video-record". The backend driver registers restricted memory pools for the use-cases it supports. Each use-case has it's own restricted memory pool since different use-cases requires isolation from different parts of the system. A restricted memory pool can be based on a static carveout instantiated while probing the TEE backend driver, or dynamically allocated from CMA and made restricted as needed by the TEE. This can be tested on a RockPi 4B+ with the following steps: repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m rockpi4.xml \ -b prototype/sdp-v6 repo sync -j8 cd build make toolchains -j$(nproc) make all -j$(nproc) # Copy ../out/rockpi4.img to an SD card and boot the RockPi from that # Connect a monitor to the RockPi # login and at the prompt: gst-launch-1.0 videotestsrc ! \ aesenc key=1f9423681beb9a79215820f6bda73d0f \ iv=e9aa8e834d8d70b7e0d254ff670dd718 serialize-iv=true ! \ aesdec key=1f9423681beb9a79215820f6bda73d0f ! \ kmssink The aesdec module has been hacked to use an OP-TEE TA to decrypt the stream into restricted DMA-bufs which are consumed by the kmssink. The primitive QEMU tests from previous patch set can be tested on RockPi in the same way with: xtest --sdp-basic The primitive test are tested on QEMU with the following steps: repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \ -b prototype/sdp-v6 repo sync -j8 cd build make toolchains -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 all -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 run-only # login and at the prompt: xtest --sdp-basic The SPMC_AT_EL=1 parameter configures the build with FF-A and an SPMC at S-EL1 inside OP-TEE. The parameter can be changed into SPMC_AT_EL=n to test without FF-A using the original SMC ABI instead. Please remember to do %rm -rf ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu for TF-A to be rebuilt properly using the new configuration. https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html list dependencies needed to build the above. The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc. Thanks, Jens Changes since V5: * Removing "tee: add restricted memory allocation" and "tee: add TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_FD_INFO" * Adding "tee: implement restricted DMA-heap", "tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor", "tee: add tee_shm_alloc_cma_phys_mem()", "optee: pass parent device to tee_device_alloc()", and "tee: tee_device_alloc(): copy dma_mask from parent device" * The two TEE driver OPs "rstmem_alloc()" and "rstmem_free()" are replaced with a struct tee_rstmem_pool abstraction. * Replaced the the TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC user space API with the DMA-heap API Changes since V4: * Adding the patch "tee: add TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_FD_INFO" needed by the GStreamer demo * Removing the dummy CPU access and mmap functions from the dma_buf_ops * Fixing a compile error in "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" reported by kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Changes since V3: * Make the use_case and flags field in struct tee_shm u32's instead of u16's * Add more description for TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC in the header file * Import namespace DMA_BUF in module tee, reported by lkp(a)intel.com * Added a note in the commit message for "optee: account for direction while converting parameters" why it's needed * Factor out dynamic restricted memory allocation from "optee: support restricted memory allocation" into two new commits "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" and "optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation" * Guard CMA usage with #ifdef CONFIG_CMA, effectively disabling dynamic restricted memory allocate if CMA isn't configured Changes since the V2 RFC: * Based on v6.12 * Replaced the flags for SVP and Trusted UID memory with a u32 field with unique id for each use case * Added dynamic allocation of restricted memory pools * Added OP-TEE ABI both with and without FF-A for dynamic restricted memory * Added support for FF-A with FFA_LEND Changes since the V1 RFC: * Based on v6.11 * Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC Changes since Olivier's post [2]: * Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in the generic restricted heap * Simplifications and cleanup * New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap support" * Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable Etienne Carriere (1): tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor Jens Wiklander (9): tee: tee_device_alloc(): copy dma_mask from parent device optee: pass parent device to tee_device_alloc() optee: account for direction while converting parameters optee: sync secure world ABI headers tee: implement restricted DMA-heap tee: add tee_shm_alloc_cma_phys_mem() optee: support restricted memory allocation optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 10 +- drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 194 +++++++++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 27 +- drivers/tee/optee/optee_msg.h | 65 ++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 55 +++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 71 ++++- drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 +- drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 190 ++++++++++-- drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 147 +++++++--- drivers/tee/tee_heap.c | 470 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 7 + drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 199 ++++++++++++- include/linux/tee_core.h | 67 +++++ include/linux/tee_drv.h | 10 + include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 29 ++ 19 files changed, 1781 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_heap.c base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 -- 2.43.0

9 months, 3 weeks

3
47
0 0

Extract RPMB Key

by Stauffer Thomas MTANA

As far as I understand there are currently two possibilities to setup an RPMB with an appropriate key. 1. Use a specialized OP-TEE with CFG_RPMB_WRITE_KEY=y during production in an environment were leaking the key is ok. 2. Get the HUK, get the CID from the MMC, then use scripts/derive_rpmb_key.py to calculate the RPMB key and set e.g. via mmc tool. I've the impression when I read through some message on https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues, that 1 is not considered the best idea. Currently I'm working on a iMX8M platform and using CFG_RPMB_WRITE_KEY also has the drawback to use the legacy RPMB interface, which makes tee-supplicant still necessary, which otherwise would not be needed. The problem at least on iMX8M is that its not easy possible to get the HUK, and the HUK also is different, depending if a device is in a closed state or not. To extract the whole HUK, even in a sensible environment during production, seems unnecessary. What I did now, something very simple. I extended tee_rpmb_fs.c a little bit and made a function which allows to retrieve the RPMB key, I added also a tiny PTA, and a corresponding user space application to get the RPMB key, only as long CFG_INSECURE is set, therefore also only a specialized OP-TEE build can provide this functionality. Someone can now decide to get the RPMB key either before the device is closed (for testing devices), or afterwards. Write then the RPMB key manually (e.g. via mmc tool) and/or also store it securly in a production data database. What would be the advantages, compared to CFG_RPMB_WRITE_KEY=y - HUK is still not leaked, as it may be used to derive other secrets - derive_rpmb_key.py is not necessary - It is guaranteed that the correct RPMB key is retrieved, 100% matches how OP-TEE was configured (e.g. with compat mode enabled or not) - Because the RPMB key is known, one can manually still delete the RPMB and see how OP-TEE handles this situation, at least during development - Testing this functionality also on an open device (which is currently not possible at least on iMX8M, due to plat_rpmb_key_is_ready) My question is, if there would be any interest to open a PR, so other people also can use this?

9 months, 4 weeks

2
2
0 0

Conflict with "fallthrough" define

by Jacob Kroon

Hi, We are using OP-TEE together with a library that provides its own "fallthrough" define, similar to what OP-TEE does in lib/libutils/ext/include/compiler.h: #define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) However, this other library checks for fallthrough attribute support by first doing: #if __has_cpp_attribute(fallthrough) ... #endif which fails to compile due to the OP-TEE define. Would OP-TEE accept a patch to rename the "fallthrough" define to something like "optee_fallthrough", "FALLTHROUGH", <other suggestion> ? Or should we upstream a patch to the library to do: #if __has_cpp_attribute(__fallthrough__) ... #endif (which is what OP-TEE currently does) Regards Jacob

10 months

3
2
0 0

[RFC PATCH 0/7] KVM: optee: Introduce OP-TEE Mediator for exposing secure world to KVM guests

by Yuvraj Sakshith

A KVM guest running on an arm64 machine will not be able to interact with a trusted execution environment (which supports non-secure guests) like OP-TEE in the secure world. This is because, instructions provided by the architecture (such as, SMC) which switch control to the firmware, are trapped in EL2 when the guest is executes them. This series adds a feature into the kernel called the TEE mediator abstraction layer, which lets a guest interact with the secure world. Additionally, a OP-TEE specific mediator is also implemented, which hooks itself to the TEE mediator layer and intercepts guest SMCs targetted at OP-TEE. Overview ========= Essentially, if the kernel wants to interact with OP-TEE, it makes an "smc - secure monitor call instruction", after loading in arguments into CPU registers. What these arguments consists of and how both these entities communicate can vary. If a guest wants to establish a connection with the secure world, its not possible. This is because of the fact that "smc" by the guest are trapped by the hypervisor in EL2. This is done by setting the HCR_EL2.TSC bit before entering the guest. Hence, this feature which I we may call TEE mediator, acts as an intermediary between the guest and OP-TEE. Instead of denying the guest SMC and jumping back into the guest, the mediator forwards the request to OP-TEE. OP-TEE supports virtualization in the normal world and expects 6 things from the NS-hypervisor: 1. Notify OP-TEE when a VM is created. 2. Notify OP-TEE when a VM is destroyed. 3. Any SMC to OP-TEE has to contain the VMID in x7. If its the hypervisor sending, then VMID is 0. 4. Hypervisor has to perform IPA->PA translations of the memory addresses sent by guest. 5. Memory shared by the VM to OP-TEE has to remain pinned. 6. The hypervisor has to follow the OP-TEE protocol, so the guest thinks it is directly speaking to OP-TEE. Its important to note that, if OP-TEE is built with NS-virtualization support, it can only function if there is a hypervisor with a mediator in normal world. This implementation has been heavily inspired by Xen's OP-TEE mediator. Design ====== The unique design of KVM makes it quite challenging to implement such a mediator. OP-TEE is not aware of the host-guest paradigm. Hence, the mediator treats the host as a VM with VMID 1. The guests are assigned VMIDs starting from 2 (note, these are not the VMIDs tagged in TLB, rather we implement our own simple indexing mechanism). When the host's OP-TEE driver is initialised or released, OP-TEE is notified about VM 1 being created/destroyed. When a VMM (such as, QEMU) created a guest through KVM ioctls, a call to the TEE mediator layer is made, which in-turn calls OP-TEE mediator which eventually assigns a VM context, VMID, etc. and notifies OP-TEE about guest creation. The opposite happens on guest destruction. When the guest makes an SMC targetting OP-TEE, it is trapped by the hypervisor and the register state (kvm_vcpu) is sent to the OP-TEE mediator through the TEE layer. Here there are two possibilities. The guest may make an SMC with arguments which are simple numeric values, exchanging UUID, version information, etc. In this case, the mediator has much less work. It has to attach VMID into X7 and pass the register state to OP-TEE. But, when guest passes memory addresses as arguments, the mediator has to translate these into physical addresses from intermediate physical addresses (IPA). According to the OP-TEE protocol (as documented in optee_smc.h and optee_msg.h), the guest OP-TEE driver would share a buffer filled with pointers, which the mediator translates. The OP-TEE mediator also keeps track of active calls between each guest and OP-TEE, and pins pages which are already shared. This is to avoid swapping of shared pages by the host under memory pressure. These pages are unpinned as soon as guest's transaction completes with OP-TEE. Testing ======= The feature has been tested on QEMU virt platform using "xtest" as the test suite. As of now, all of 35000+ tests pass. The mediator has also been stressed under memory pressure and all tests pass too. Any suggestions on further testing the feature are welcome. Call for review =============== Any insights/suggestions regarding the implementation are appreciated. Yuvraj Sakshith (7): firmware: smccc: Add macros for Trusted OS/App owner check on SMC value tee: Add TEE Mediator module which aims to expose TEE to a KVM guest. KVM: Notify TEE Mediator when KVM creates and destroys guests KVM: arm64: Forward guest CPU state to TEE mediator on SMC trap tee: optee: Add OPTEE_SMC_VM_CREATED and OPTEE_SMC_VM_DESTROYED tee: optee: Add OP-TEE Mediator tee: optee: Notify TEE Mediator on OP-TEE driver initialization and release arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 15 +- drivers/tee/Kconfig | 5 + drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 13 +- drivers/tee/optee/optee_mediator.c | 1319 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/optee/optee_mediator.h | 103 +++ drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 53 ++ drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 6 + drivers/tee/tee_mediator.c | 145 +++ include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 8 + include/linux/tee_mediator.h | 39 + virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 11 +- 14 files changed, 1721 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_mediator.c create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_mediator.h create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_mediator.c create mode 100644 include/linux/tee_mediator.h -- 2.43.0

10 months

2
11
0 0

[PATCH] tee: shm: fix slab page refcounting

by Marco Felsch

Skip manipulating the refcount in case of slab pages according commit b9c0e49abfca ("mm: decline to manipulate the refcount on a slab page"). Fixes: b9c0e49abfca ("mm: decline to manipulate the refcount on a slab page") Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch(a)pengutronix.de> --- drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c index daf6e5cfd59a..3d6a3077b6f2 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c @@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ static void shm_put_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count) { size_t n; - for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) - put_page(pages[n]); + for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) { + struct page *page = pages[n]; + + if (!PageSlab(page)) + put_page(pages[n]); + } } static void shm_get_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count) { size_t n; - for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) - get_page(pages[n]); + for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) { + struct page *page = pages[n]; + + if (!PageSlab(page)) + get_page(pages[n]); + } } static void release_registered_pages(struct tee_shm *shm) -- 2.39.5

10 months, 1 week

1
1
0 0

Linaro OP-TEE Contribution, LOC, monthly meeting March 25

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, Tomorrow, Tuesday, it's time for another LOC monthly meeting. For time and connection details see the calendar at https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/ I've posted another version of the Secure Data Path patches [1] if you have any thoughts on that. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250305130634.1850178-1-jens.wiklander@linaro… Are there any other topics? Cheers, Jesn

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs via the TEE subsystem. The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE (OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or perhaps a future QCOMTEE) which sets up the restrictions for the memory used for the DMA-bufs. I've added a new IOCTL, TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC, to allocate the restricted DMA-bufs. This IOCTL reaches the backend TEE driver, allowing it to choose how to allocate the restricted physical memory. TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC takes in addition to a size and flags parameters also a use-case parameter. This is used by the backend TEE driver to decide on allocation policy and which devices should be able to access the memory. Three use-cases (Secure Video Playback, Trusted UI, and Secure Video Recording) has been identified so far to serve as examples of what can be expected. More use-cases can be added in userspace ABI, but it's up to the backend TEE drivers to provide the implementation. Each use-case has it's own restricted memory pool since different use-cases requires isolation from different parts of the system. A restricted memory pool can be based on a static carveout instantiated while probing the TEE backend driver, or dynamically allocated from CMA and made restricted as needed by the TEE. This can be tested on QEMU with the following steps: repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \ -b prototype/sdp-v4 repo sync -j8 cd build make toolchains -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 all -j$(nproc) make SPMC_AT_EL=1 run-only # login and at the prompt: xtest --sdp-basic The SPMC_AT_EL=1 parameter configures the build with FF-A and an SPMC at S-EL1 inside OP-TEE. The parameter can be changed into SPMC_AT_EL=n to test without FF-A using the original SMC ABI instead. Please remember to do %rm -rf ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu for TF-A to be rebuilt properly using the new configuration. https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html list dependencies needed to build the above. The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc. Thanks, Jens Changes since V3: * Make the use_case and flags field in struct tee_shm u32's instead of u16's * Add more description for TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC in the header file * Import namespace DMA_BUF in module tee, reported by lkp(a)intel.com * Added a note in the commit message for "optee: account for direction while converting parameters" why it's needed * Factor out dynamic restricted memory allocation from "optee: support restricted memory allocation" into two new commits "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" and "optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation" * Guard CMA usage with #ifdef CONFIG_CMA, effectively disabling dynamic restricted memory allocate if CMA isn't configured Changes since the V2 RFC: * Based on v6.12 * Replaced the flags for SVP and Trusted UID memory with a u32 field with unique id for each use case * Added dynamic allocation of restricted memory pools * Added OP-TEE ABI both with and without FF-A for dynamic restricted memory * Added support for FF-A with FFA_LEND Changes since the V1 RFC: * Based on v6.11 * Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC Changes since Olivier's post [2]: * Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in the generic restricted heap * Simplifications and cleanup * New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap support" * Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable Jens Wiklander (6): tee: add restricted memory allocation optee: account for direction while converting parameters optee: sync secure world ABI headers optee: support restricted memory allocation optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 10 +- drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 178 +++++++++++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 27 ++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_msg.h | 65 ++++- drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 75 ++++-- drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 71 +++++- drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++- drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 213 ++++++++++++++-- drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 38 ++- drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 2 + drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 2 + drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c | 69 +++++- include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 ++ include/linux/tee_drv.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 44 +++- 20 files changed, 1358 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c base-commit: fac04efc5c793dccbd07e2d59af9f90b7fc0dca4 -- 2.43.0

10 months, 2 weeks

10
42
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/8] Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE)

by Amirreza Zarrabi

This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs) and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services. Kernel and userspace services are also available to QTEE through a similar approach. QTEE makes callback requests that are converted into object invocations. These objects can represent services within the kernel or userspace process. Note: This patch series focuses on QTEE objects and userspace services. Linux already provides a TEE subsystem, which is described in [1]. The tee subsystem provides a generic ioctl interface, TEE_IOC_INVOKE, which can be used by userspace to talk to a TEE backend driver. We extend the Linux TEE subsystem to understand object parameters and an ioctl call so client can invoke objects in QTEE: - TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF_* - TEE_IOC_OBJECT_INVOKE The existing ioctl calls TEE_IOC_SUPPL_RECV and TEE_IOC_SUPPL_SEND are used for invoking services in the userspace process by QTEE. The TEE backend driver uses the QTEE Transport Message to communicate with QTEE. Interactions through the object INVOKE interface are translated into QTEE messages. Likewise, object invocations from QTEE for userspace objects are converted into SEND/RECV ioctl calls to supplicants. The details of QTEE Transport Message to communicate with QTEE is available in [PATCH 10/10] Documentation: tee: Add Qualcomm TEE driver. You can run basic tests with following steps: git clone https://github.com/quic/quic-teec.git cd quic-teec mkdir build cmake .. -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=CMakeToolchain.txt -DBUILD_UNITTEST=ON https://github.com/quic/quic-teec/blob/main/README.md lists dependancies needed to build the above. This series has been tested for basic QTEE object invocations and callback requests, including loading a TA and requesting services form the TA. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/tee.txt Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi(a)quicinc.com> --- Changes in v2: - Clean up commit messages and comments. - Use better names such as ubuf instead of membuf or QCOMTEE prefix instead of QCOM_TEE, or names that are more consistent with other TEE-backend drivers such as qcomtee_context_data instead of qcom_tee_context. - Drop the DTS patch and instantiate the device from the scm driver. - Use a single structure for all driver's internal states. - Drop srcu primitives and use the existing mutex for synchronization between the supplicant and QTEE. - Directly use tee_context to track the lifetime of qcomtee_context_data. - Add close_context() to be called when the user closes the tee_context. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-v1… Changes in v1: - It is a complete rewrite to utilize the TEE subsystem. - Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240702-qcom-tee-object-and-ioctls-v1-0-633c3d… --- Amirreza Zarrabi (8): tee: allow a driver to allocate a tee_device without a pool tee: add close_context to TEE driver operation tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF firmware: qcom: scm: add support for object invocation tee: add Qualcomm TEE driver qcomtee: add primordial object Documentation: tee: Add Qualcomm TEE driver Documentation/tee/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/tee/qtee.rst | 150 ++++++ drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 128 ++++++ drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 7 + drivers/tee/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/Makefile | 10 + drivers/tee/qcomtee/async.c | 160 +++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/call.c | 741 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c | 810 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/primordial_obj.c | 65 +++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_msg.h | 234 ++++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_private.h | 226 +++++++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/release.c | 59 +++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/shm.c | 102 +++++ drivers/tee/qcomtee/user_obj.c | 712 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 121 ++++- drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 6 - include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 27 ++ include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_tee.h | 286 ++++++++++++ include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 +- include/linux/tee_drv.h | 18 + include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 54 ++- 25 files changed, 3964 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) --- base-commit: dab2734f8e9ecba609d66d1dd087a392a7774c04 change-id: 20241202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-362c66340527 Best regards, -- Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi(a)quicinc.com>

11 months

5
24
0 0

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: .mailmap: Update Sumit Garg's email address

by Sumit Garg

Update Sumit Garg's email address to @kernel.org. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> --- .mailmap | 1 + MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap index a897c16d3bae..4a93909286d8 100644 --- a/.mailmap +++ b/.mailmap @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram(a)quicinc.com> <subbaram(a)codeaurora.org> Subhash Jadavani <subhashj(a)codeaurora.org> Sudarshan Rajagopalan <quic_sudaraja(a)quicinc.com> <sudaraja(a)codeaurora.org> Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla(a)arm.com> Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha(a)arm.com> +Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal(a)ti.com> Surabhi Vishnoi <quic_svishnoi(a)quicinc.com> <svishnoi(a)codeaurora.org> Sven Eckelmann <sven(a)narfation.org> <seckelmann(a)datto.com> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1b0cc181db74..616f859c5f92 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -12861,7 +12861,7 @@ F: include/keys/trusted_dcp.h F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_dcp.c KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE -M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: linux-integrity(a)vger.kernel.org L: keyrings(a)vger.kernel.org S: Supported @@ -17661,7 +17661,7 @@ F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices F: drivers/tee/optee/ OP-TEE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR (RNG) DRIVER -M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: op-tee(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org S: Maintained F: drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c @@ -23272,7 +23272,7 @@ F: include/media/i2c/tw9910.h TEE SUBSYSTEM M: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> -R: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> +R: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)kernel.org> L: op-tee(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org S: Maintained F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee -- 2.43.0

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Linaro OP-TEE Contribution, LOC, monthly meeting February 25

by Jens Wiklander

Hi, Tomorrow, Tuesday, it's time for another LOC monthly meeting. For time and connection details see the calendar at https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/ I recently posted a new version of the Restricted DMA-buf patch set [1], and there's also an ongoing discussion that already started on the previous version of the patch set [2]. We're discussing whether the restricted DMA-bufs should be allocated from DMA heaps or the TEE subsystem. Both approaches work, but we need to decide on one for the patch set to move forward. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250218143527.1236668-1-jens.wiklander@linaro… [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241217100809.3962439-1-jens.wiklander@linaro… Are there any other topics? Cheers, Jens

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

OP-TEE