Hello Varun,
Patch 1 should be in LTS, as it corrects a compilation issue when enabling DECRYPTION_SUPPORT.
The other ones correct sparse tool warnings, so I'm not sure they fit with LTS criteria. That said, patch 2 & 4, by adding static to functions, reduce their scopes, so may be seen as security patches. Patch 3 shouldn't go to LTS.
Best regards, Yann
On 1/19/23 12:58, Varun Wadekar wrote:
Hello ST maintainers,
Hope you are doing well.
The merge window for the next LTS release is now open. We are collecting changes for the release and need your input.
Can you please help us decide if the following patches should be part of the LTS release?
- 377846b65 fix(st): include utils.h to solve compilation error
- d1d8a9bad fix(st): make metadata_block_spec static
- 6e55f9e2c fix(stm32mp1): add missing platform.h include
- 70a422ba8 fix(st-crypto): set get_plain_pk_from_asn1() static
Thanks.
TF-A LTS mailing list -- tfa-lts@lists.trustedfirmware.org To unsubscribe send an email to tfa-lts-leave@lists.trustedfirmware.org