On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 01:26:18PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:29 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Fine, but:
--- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/rpmb.h @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 */
Really?
Why? I need lots of documentation and a lawyer sign off for why this is a dual license for a file that is obviously only for internal Linux kernel stuff.
I'm sorry that was added via one of the patch sets before mine. I'll revert to GPL-2.0 only.
Please be sure to get proper legal approval to change the license of code not written by you :)