10 May
2025
10 May
'25
9:10 a.m.
On Fri, May 9, 2025, at 23:22, Jann Horn wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:14 PM Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
The second patch looks like it should be a bugfix for 6.15 instead, any reason to have it only in 6.16?
FWIW, it's more of a cleanup than a real bugfix; there is an unsigned integer wraparound, but if that occurs, we're guaranteed to hit a memory allocation bailout pretty much immediately afterwards. So I think putting it in 6.16 is reasonable.
Ok, I see. Merged now.
Arnd