Hi Matteo,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 2:19 PM Matteo Facchinetti facmatteo@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a doubt about the correct priority that tee-supplicant should have in the system.
In detail, we have 2 user-space applications (user-pkcs11-0, user-pkcs11-1) that use the same PKCS11 services from OPTEE-OS (access to RPDB partition for private key). For project reason we use the following nice priority values:
user-pkcs11-0, nice=-5 user-pkcs11-1, nice=-10 .... tee-supplcant, nice=0 ... a lot of other services with nice=0 ...Unfortunately, in some strange case when CPU is overload (booting).... appear a strange problem in user-pkcs11-1: occasionally the time for the certificate's signature check explode to 400ms.
Due to the problem to replicate this defect, I have try to investigate in theory if could be verify a starvation/race-condition between tee-supplicant and user-pkcs11-1 or other-services. In this scenario, what is the correct priority value that tee-supplicant should have?
I suspect that we should change the priority of tee-supplcant = user-pkcs11-1 = -10 Is it make sense for you, or maybe better to search the problem from an other side :-) ?
There are more factors than the nice value to determine if a process will get CPU time. However, processes with higher priority requesting a service from tee-supplicant with lower priority might result in priority inversion if the scheduler doesn't note the dependency.
You could try changing the nice value of the tee supplicant to see if it makes a difference, but I suspect that someone else is requesting RPMB service from the tee-supplicant. If one RPMB request is in progress while another is being made, it's bound to result in a noticeable delay.
Cheers, Jens
Thanks in advance for your attention
BR Matteo Facchinetti