On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:56:58PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
Hello Mathieu,
On 9/12/24 17:26, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
Add support for releasing remote processor firmware through the Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) interface.
The tee_rproc_release_fw() function is called in the following cases:
- An error occurs in rproc_start() between the loading of the segments and the start of the remote processor.
- When rproc_release_fw is called on error or after stopping the remote processor.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 7694817f25d4..32052dedc149 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/debugfs.h> #include <linux/rculist.h> #include <linux/remoteproc.h> +#include <linux/remoteproc_tee.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/elf.h> @@ -1258,6 +1259,9 @@ static int rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts(struct rproc *rproc) static void rproc_release_fw(struct rproc *rproc) {
- if (rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE && rproc->tee_interface)
tee_rproc_release_fw(rproc);Function tee_rproc_release_fw() returns a value that is ignored. I don't know how it passes the Sparse checker but I already see patches coming in my Inbox to deal with that. In this case there is nothing else to do if there is an error releasing the firware. As such I would put a (void) in front and add a comment about the return value being ignore on purpose.
Instead of ignoring the error, I wonder if we should panic in tee_rproc_release_fw(). Indeed, we would be in an unexpected state without any possible action to return to a normal state.
Nowadays a call to panic() is only used in very dire situations and I don't see this meeting that requirement. I would just call a dev_err() and let it be.
Regards, Arnaud
- /* Free the copy of the resource table */ kfree(rproc->cached_table); rproc->cached_table = NULL;
@@ -1348,7 +1352,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare subdevices for %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
goto reset_table_ptr;
goto release_fw;/* power up the remote processor */ @@ -1376,7 +1380,9 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) rproc->ops->stop(rproc); unprepare_subdevices: rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc); -reset_table_ptr: +release_fw:
- if (rproc->tee_interface)
tee_rproc_release_fw(rproc);Same here.
rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table; return ret; -- 2.25.1