On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:37:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
Add MAINTAINERS entry for TEE based Trusted Keys framework.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 48aff80..eb3d889 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -9663,6 +9663,14 @@ F: include/keys/trusted-type.h F: include/keys/trusted_tpm.h F: security/keys/trusted-keys/ +KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE +M: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org +L: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org +L: keyrings@vger.kernel.org +S: Supported +F: include/keys/trusted_tee.h +F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c
KEYS/KEYRINGS M: David Howells dhowells@redhat.com M: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com -- 2.7.4
I'm sorry but I think I have changed my mind on this. This has been spinning for a while and sometimes conclusions change over the time.
I don't think that we really need a separate subsystem tag. I'd be for a new M-entry or R-entry to the existing subsystem tag. It's essential to have ack from someone with ARM and TEE knowledge but this way too heavy for the purpose.
I also see it the most manageable if the trusted keys PR's come from a single source.
/Jarkko