Hi Herbert,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:34 AM Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
Uses the new simplified tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf() function instead of the old deprecated tee_shm_alloc() function which required specific TEE_SHM-flags.
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org
drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Since this patch depends on other patches in this patch set and vice versa is it OK if I take this patch via my tree? I'm aiming for v5.18 with this.
Thanks, Jens
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c index 135a82590923..a948c0727b2b 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c @@ -145,10 +145,10 @@ static int optee_rng_init(struct hwrng *rng) struct optee_rng_private *pvt_data = to_optee_rng_private(rng); struct tee_shm *entropy_shm_pool = NULL;
entropy_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc(pvt_data->ctx, MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ,TEE_SHM_MAPPED | TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF);
entropy_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(pvt_data->ctx,MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ); if (IS_ERR(entropy_shm_pool)) {
dev_err(pvt_data->dev, "tee_shm_alloc failed\n");
dev_err(pvt_data->dev, "tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf failed\n"); return PTR_ERR(entropy_shm_pool); }-- 2.31.1