On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:50 AM Jisheng Zhang Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:53:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:48:53 -0700 Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:34:07AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:44:09PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes to complete one invoke_fn call.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com
arm64:defconfig:
make-arm64 -j drivers/tee/optee/call.o CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CC drivers/tee/optee/call.o In file included from drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:67, from drivers/tee/optee/call.c:18: ./include/trace/define_trace.h:95:42: fatal error: ./optee_trace.h: No such file or directory 95 | #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE) | ^ compilation terminated.
Interesting, I always build linux kernel with "O=", didn't see such build error and IIRC, we didn't receive any lkp robot build error report.
My steps are:
mkdir /tmp/test
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- O=/tmp/test defconfig
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- O=/tmp/test drivers/tee/optee/
Today, I tried to build the linux kernel w/o "O=...", I reproduced this error! This is the first time I saw "O=" make a different behavior.
I'm also compiling with O=... and couldn't understand what was going on. Thanks for saving me from digging any deeper.
I'll send out a patch to fix it.
Thanks, Jens