On 02.11.23 08:37, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 17:14, Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka@siemens.com wrote:
On 31.10.23 12:04, Jerome Forissier wrote:
On 10/30/23 16:59, Sumit Garg wrote:
Currently supplicant dependent optee device enumeration only registers devices whenever tee-supplicant is invoked for the first time. But it forgets to remove devices when tee-supplicant daemon stops running and closes its context gracefully. This leads to following error for fTPM driver during reboot/shutdown:
[ 73.466791] tpm tpm0: ftpm_tee_tpm_op_send: SUBMIT_COMMAND invoke error: 0xffff3024
Fix this by separating supplicant dependent devices so that the user-space service can detach supplicant devices before closing the supplicant.
Reported-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka@siemens.com Link: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/6094 Fixes: 5f178bb71e3a ("optee: enable support for multi-stage bus enumeration") Tested-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka@siemens.com Tested-by: Masahisa Kojima masahisa.kojima@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org
drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c index 64f0e047c23d..78fc0a15c463 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c @@ -60,9 +60,10 @@ static void optee_release_device(struct device *dev) kfree(optee_device); }
-static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid) +static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid, u32 func) { struct tee_client_device *optee_device = NULL;
const char *dev_name_fmt = NULL; int rc;
optee_device = kzalloc(sizeof(*optee_device), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -71,7 +72,13 @@ static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid)
optee_device->dev.bus = &tee_bus_type; optee_device->dev.release = optee_release_device;
- if (dev_set_name(&optee_device->dev, "optee-ta-%pUb", device_uuid)) {
- if (func == PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP)
dev_name_fmt = "optee-ta-supp-%pUb";
- else
dev_name_fmt = "optee-ta-%pUb";
That's an ABI change, isn't it?
Indeed it is an ABI break although we would like this to be backported but don't want to break existing users. So I brainstormed on it and came up with an alternative fix via device attribute in v4. Please have a look.
Oh, here did this come from! Yes, I recently had to adjust some systemd service due to carrying this patch but looking for the change only in upstream:
https://github.com/ilbers/isar/commit/83644ddf694e51f11793e6107e4aaf68dc0043...
You don't need to unbind all of the optee devices. v4 would help you to maintain backwards compatibility, can you retest it?
How do I know from tee-supplicant perspective which devices I need to unbind? There could be one in the future that will also use storage and will therefore also fail once the supplicant is gone.
Jan