Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:22 AM Wang, Xiaolei Xiaolei.Wang@windriver.com wrote:
When an rpc message to release memory is not received, a memory leak will occur, which should be released
unreferenced object 0xffff00006871b580 (size 128):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892673 (age 428.192s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
80 b3 71 68 00 00 ff ff 00 e0 71 a8 00 00 00 00 ..qh......q..... 00 e0 71 68 00 00 ff ff 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..qh............
backtrace:
[<00000000f0425299>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x6c/0x338 [<000000004705f905>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d4/0x328 [<00000000773c66a0>] tee_shm_alloc+0x84/0x268 [<00000000ca052f98>] optee_handle_rpc+0x144/0x5a0 [<0000000015a8eebe>] optee_do_call_with_arg+0x14c/0x168 [<00000000d51ef0fd>] optee_open_session+0x12c/0x200 [<000000007146f51d>] tee_client_open_session+0x24/0x38 [<00000000ea2b35e7>] optee_enumerate_devices+0xa0/0x2c0 [<0000000068088775>] optee_probe+0x560/0x690 [<00000000ad1d997a>] platform_drv_probe+0x54/0xa8 [<00000000e11592d4>] really_probe+0x118/0x3e0 [<00000000dacd3142>] driver_probe_device+0x5c/0xc0 [<0000000077c13842>] device_driver_attach+0x74/0x80 [<00000000106ccc62>] __driver_attach+0x8c/0xd8 [<00000000e120c345>] bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd8 [<00000000b79335f5>] driver_attach+0x24/0x30
Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 +-
drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c index 20b6fd7383c5..522c133b9d95 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ u32 optee_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, phys_addr_t parg)
struct optee_rpc_param param = { }; struct optee_call_ctx call_ctx = { }; u32 ret;
unsigned int flags = 0; param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG; reg_pair_from_64(¶m.a1, ¶m.a2, parg); @@ -153,9 +154,13 @@ u32 optee_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, phys_addr_t parg) param.a1 = res.a1; param.a2 = res.a2; param.a3 = res.a3;
optee_handle_rpc(ctx, ¶m, &call_ctx);
optee_handle_rpc(ctx, ¶m, &call_ctx, &flags); } else { ret = res.a0;
if (flags != 0x0) {
param.a0 = 2;
optee_handle_rpc(ctx, ¶m, &call_ctx, &flags);
How can you know that OP-TEE isn't still using this buffer? Buffers can be long lived.
Cheers, Jens
} break; } }
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
index 8b71839a357e..1c1d62e21141 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct optee_call_ctx { };
void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param *param,
struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx);
struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx, unsigned int *flags);
void optee_rpc_finalize_call(struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx);
void optee_wait_queue_init(struct optee_wait_queue *wq); diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c index b4ade54d1f28..4e76c87b61f4 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
- Result of RPC is written back into @param.
*/
void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param *param,
struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx, unsigned int *flags)
{
struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev; struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(teedev); @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param *param, reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a1, ¶m->a2, pa); reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a4, ¶m->a5, (unsigned long)shm);
*flags = 0x1; } else { param->a1 = 0; param->a2 = 0;
@@ -420,6 +421,7 @@ void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param *param,
case OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_FREE: shm = reg_pair_to_ptr(param->a1, param->a2); tee_shm_free(shm);
*flags = 0x0; break; case OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_FOREIGN_INTR: /*
--
2.25.1