On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:08:48PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
Hi Jarkko,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:34 AM Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
Uses the new simplified tee_shm_register_kernel_buf() function instead of the old tee_shm_alloc() function which required specific TEE_SHM-flags
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org
security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Since this patch depends on other patches in this patch set and vice versa is it OK if I take this patch via my tree? I'm aiming for v5.18 with this.
Yes.
You can also add:
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko@kernel.org
BR, Jarkko