On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:38:05AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 2:40 PM Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com wrote:
FF-A v1.1 adds support to discovery the UUIDs of the partitions that was missing in v1.0 and which the driver workarounds by using UUIDs supplied by the ffa_drivers.
Add the v1.1 get_partition_info support and disable the workaround if the detected FF-A version is greater than v1.0.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com
drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/arm_ffa.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c index 2532e0f16cc9..dd6ab2f81580 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c @@ -264,18 +264,24 @@ static int ffa_rxtx_unmap(u16 vm_id) return 0; }
+#define PARTITION_INFO_GET_RETURN_COUNT_ONLY BIT(0)
/* buffer must be sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info) * num_partitions */ static int __ffa_partition_info_get(u32 uuid0, u32 uuid1, u32 uuid2, u32 uuid3, struct ffa_partition_info *buffer, int num_partitions) {
int count;
int idx, count, flags = 0, size; ffa_value_t partition_info;
if (!buffer || !num_partitions) /* Just get the count for now */
flags = PARTITION_INFO_GET_RETURN_COUNT_ONLY;
mutex_lock(&drv_info->rx_lock); invoke_ffa_fn((ffa_value_t){ .a0 = FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET, .a1 = uuid0, .a2 = uuid1, .a3 = uuid2, .a4 = uuid3,
.a5 = flags, }, &partition_info); if (partition_info.a0 == FFA_ERROR) {
@@ -285,8 +291,18 @@ __ffa_partition_info_get(u32 uuid0, u32 uuid1, u32 uuid2, u32 uuid3,
count = partition_info.a2;
if (drv_info->version > FFA_VERSION_1_0) {
size = partition_info.a3;
if (size > sizeof(*buffer))
size = sizeof(*buffer);
Below when calculating the address in the source buffer with "drv_info->rx_buffer + idx * size" you should use the size from partition_info.a3 even if it's larger than sizeof(*buffer). The amount of bytes to copy looks correct though. Does that make sense?
Good spot, I missed to see that. It makes complete sense. I will fix it.