On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 19:42, Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:51 PM Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 20:38, Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:
tee_shm_register() is replaced by the previously introduced functions tee_shm_register_user_buf() and tee_shm_register_kernel_buf().
Since there are not external callers left we can remove tee_shm_register() and refactor the remains.
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org
drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- include/linux/tee_drv.h | 11 --- 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c index 6a1dbce75616..fe3e5977dd7c 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c @@ -12,17 +12,43 @@ #include <linux/uio.h> #include "tee_private.h"
+static void shm_put_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) +{
unsigned long n;nit: Can we have a consistent prototype for the number of pages? size_t as used by struct tee_shm or unsigned long? Same holds true for variables below as well: npages, page_count, num_pages, n.
Fair point, I'll fix what's changed here.
for (n = 0; n < npages; n++)put_page(pages[n]);+}
+static int shm_get_kernel_pages(unsigned long start, int page_count,
struct page **pages)+{
struct kvec *kiov;unsigned int n;int rc;kiov = kcalloc(page_count, sizeof(*kiov), GFP_KERNEL);if (!kiov)return -ENOMEM;for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) {kiov[n].iov_base = (void *)(start + n * PAGE_SIZE);kiov[n].iov_len = PAGE_SIZE;}rc = get_kernel_pages(kiov, page_count, 0, pages);kfree(kiov);return rc;+}
static void release_registered_pages(struct tee_shm *shm) { if (shm->pages) {
if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED) {
if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED) unpin_user_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
} else {size_t n;for (n = 0; n < shm->num_pages; n++)put_page(shm->pages[n]);}
elseshm_put_kernel_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages); kfree(shm->pages); }@@ -191,28 +217,24 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf);
-struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr,
size_t length, u32 flags)+static struct tee_shm * +register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr,
size_t length, u32 flags, int id){ struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev;
const u32 req_user_flags = TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF | TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED;const u32 req_kernel_flags = TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF | TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED; struct tee_shm *shm;
unsigned long start;int num_pages; void *ret; int rc;
int num_pages;unsigned long start;if (flags != req_user_flags && flags != req_kernel_flags)return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); if (!tee_device_get(teedev)) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); if (!teedev->desc->ops->shm_register || !teedev->desc->ops->shm_unregister) {tee_device_put(teedev);return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);Checkpatch warns about this error code:
WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP #104: FILE: drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:236:
- ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
I noticed that too. I'd rather keep it as it is for now as changing would a bit of a ABI change even if I doubt that anyone is depending on this particular errno value.
Okay, I am fine with this.
-Sumit
goto err_dev_put; } teedev_ctx_get(ctx);@@ -220,13 +242,13 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr, shm = kzalloc(sizeof(*shm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!shm) { ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
goto err;
goto err_ctx_put; } refcount_set(&shm->refcount, 1);
shm->flags = flags | TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
shm->flags = flags; shm->ctx = ctx;
shm->id = -1;
shm->id = id; addr = untagged_addr(addr); start = rounddown(addr, PAGE_SIZE); shm->offset = addr - start;@@ -235,71 +257,45 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr, shm->pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(*shm->pages), GFP_KERNEL); if (!shm->pages) { ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
goto err;
goto err_free_shm; }
if (flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED) {
if (flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED) rc = pin_user_pages_fast(start, num_pages, FOLL_WRITE, shm->pages);
} else {struct kvec *kiov;int i;kiov = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(*kiov), GFP_KERNEL);if (!kiov) {ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);goto err;}for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {kiov[i].iov_base = (void *)(start + i * PAGE_SIZE);kiov[i].iov_len = PAGE_SIZE;}rc = get_kernel_pages(kiov, num_pages, 0, shm->pages);kfree(kiov);}
elserc = shm_get_kernel_pages(start, num_pages, shm->pages); if (rc > 0) shm->num_pages = rc; if (rc != num_pages) { if (rc >= 0) rc = -ENOMEM; ret = ERR_PTR(rc);
goto err;}mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);shm->id = idr_alloc(&teedev->idr, shm, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);mutex_unlock(&teedev->mutex);if (shm->id < 0) {ret = ERR_PTR(shm->id);goto err;
goto err_put_shm_pages; } rc = teedev->desc->ops->shm_register(ctx, shm, shm->pages, shm->num_pages, start); if (rc) { ret = ERR_PTR(rc);
goto err;
goto err_put_shm_pages; } return shm;-err:
if (shm) {if (shm->id >= 0) {mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);idr_remove(&teedev->idr, shm->id);mutex_unlock(&teedev->mutex);}release_registered_pages(shm);}+err_put_shm_pages:
if (flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED)unpin_user_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);elseshm_put_kernel_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);kfree(shm->pages);+err_free_shm: kfree(shm); +err_ctx_put: teedev_ctx_put(ctx); +err_dev_put: tee_device_put(teedev); return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register);
/**
- tee_shm_register_user_buf() - Register a userspace shared memory buffer
@@ -312,8 +308,36 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register); struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_user_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr, size_t length) {
return tee_shm_register(ctx, addr, length,TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF | TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED);
u32 f = TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF | TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED | TEE_SHM_REGISTER;nit: I would prefer to write variable name as "flags" for clarity.
struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev;struct tee_shm *shm;void *ret;int id;mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);id = idr_alloc(&teedev->idr, NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);mutex_unlock(&teedev->mutex);nit: redundant extra line.
if (id < 0)return ERR_PTR(id);shm = register_shm_helper(ctx, addr, length, f, id);if (IS_ERR(shm)) {mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);idr_remove(&teedev->idr, id);mutex_unlock(&teedev->mutex);return shm;}mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);ret = idr_replace(&teedev->idr, shm, id);mutex_unlock(&teedev->mutex);if (IS_ERR(ret)) {tee_shm_free(shm);return ret;}return shm;} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register_user_buf);
@@ -330,8 +354,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register_user_buf); struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, void *addr, size_t length) {
return tee_shm_register(ctx, (unsigned long)addr, length,TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF | TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED);
u32 f = TEE_SHM_REGISTER | TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED;Ditto.
Thanks, Jens
-Sumit
return register_shm_helper(ctx, (unsigned long)addr, length, f, -1);} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register_kernel_buf);
diff --git a/include/linux/tee_drv.h b/include/linux/tee_drv.h index 029c9a0590cc..e4f32885e273 100644 --- a/include/linux/tee_drv.h +++ b/include/linux/tee_drv.h @@ -278,17 +278,6 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t size); struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t size);
-/**
- tee_shm_register() - Register shared memory buffer
- @ctx: Context that registers the shared memory
- @addr: Address is userspace of the shared buffer
- @length: Length of the shared buffer
- @flags: Flags setting properties for the requested shared memory.
- @returns a pointer to 'struct tee_shm'
- */
-struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr,
size_t length, u32 flags);struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_user_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr, size_t length); struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, -- 2.31.1