This series introduces the tee based EFI Runtime Variable Service.
The eMMC device is typically owned by the non-secure world(linux in
this case). There is an existing solution utilizing eMMC RPMB partition
for EFI Variables, it is implemented by interacting with
OP-TEE, StandaloneMM(as EFI Variable Service Pseudo TA), eMMC driver
and tee-supplicant. The last piece is the tee-based variable access
driver to interact with OP-TEE and StandaloneMM.
Changelog:
v7 -> v8
Only patch #3 "efi: Add tee-based EFI variable driver" is updated.
- fix typos
- refactor error handling, direct return if applicable
- use devm_add_action_or_reset() for closing of tee context/session
- remove obvious comment
v6 -> v7
Patch #1-#4 are not updated.
Patch #5 is added into this series, original patch is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230609094532.562934-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro…
There are two issues in the v6 series and v7 series addresses those.
1) efivar ops is not restored when the tee-supplicant daemon terminates.
-> As the following patch says, user must remove the device before
terminating tee-supplicant daemon.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728134832.326467-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org/
2) cause panic when someone remounts the efivarfs as RW even if
SetVariable is not supported
-> The fifth patch addresses this issue.
"[PATCH v7 5/5] efivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is
not supported"
v5 -> v6
- new patch #4 is added in this series, #1-#3 patches are unchanged.
automatically update super block flag when the efivarops support
SetVariable runtime service, so that user does not need to manually
remount the efivarfs as RW.
v4 -> v5
- rebase to efi-next based on v6.4-rc1
- set generic_ops.query_variable_info, it works as expected as follows.
$ df -h /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
efivarfs 16K 1.3K 15K 8% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
v3 -> v4:
- replace the reference from EDK2 to PI Specification
- remove EDK2 source code reference comments
- prepare nonblocking variant of set_variable, it just returns
EFI_UNSUPPORTED
- remove redundant buffer size check
- argument name change in mm_communicate
- function interface changes in setup_mm_hdr to remove (void **) cast
v2 -> v3:
- add CONFIG_EFI dependency to TEE_STMM_EFI
- add missing return code check for tee_client_invoke_func()
- directly call efivars_register/unregister from tee_stmm_efi.c
rfc v1 -> v2:
- split patch into three patches, one for drivers/tee,
one for include/linux/efi.h, and one for the driver/firmware/efi/stmm
- context/session management into probe() and remove() same as other tee
client driver
- StMM variable driver is moved from driver/tee/optee to driver/firmware/efi
- use "tee" prefix instead of "optee" in driver/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c,
this file does not contain op-tee specific code, abstracted by tee layer and
StMM variable driver will work on other tee implementation.
- PTA_STMM_CMD_COMMUNICATE -> PTA_STMM_CMD_COMMUNICATE
- implement query_variable_store() but currently not used
- no use of TEEC_SUCCESS, it is defined in driver/tee/optee/optee_private.h.
Other tee client drivers use 0 instead of using TEEC_SUCCESS
- remove TEEC_ERROR_EXCESS_DATA status, it is referred just to output
error message
Ilias Apalodimas (1):
efivarfs: force RO when remounting if SetVariable is not supported
Masahisa Kojima (4):
efi: expose efivar generic ops register function
efi: Add EFI_ACCESS_DENIED status code
efi: Add tee-based EFI variable driver
efivarfs: automatically update super block flag
drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 15 +
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 18 +
drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/mm_communication.h | 236 +++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c | 612 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c | 8 +
fs/efivarfs/super.c | 45 ++
include/linux/efi.h | 12 +
8 files changed, 947 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/mm_communication.h
create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c
base-commit: f6e6e95ce16205025b7b8680a66c30a0c4ec2270
--
2.30.2
Currently supplicant dependent optee device enumeration only registers
devices whenever tee-supplicant is invoked for the first time. But it
forgets to remove devices when tee-supplicant daemon stops running and
closes its context gracefully. This leads to following error for fTPM
driver during reboot/shutdown:
[ 73.466791] tpm tpm0: ftpm_tee_tpm_op_send: SUBMIT_COMMAND invoke error: 0xffff3024
Fix this by separating supplicant dependent devices so that the
user-space service can detach supplicant devices before closing the
supplicant. While at it use the global system workqueue for OP-TEE bus
scanning work rather than our own custom one.
Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka(a)siemens.com>
Link: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/6094
Fixes: 5f178bb71e3a ("optee: enable support for multi-stage bus enumeration")
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
Apologies for taking it too long push this v2. Actually I did brainstorm
how to best fix this tee-supplicant dependent device probing. Its hard
to predict the lifetime of user-space daemon from kernel space. So
following is the least intrusive approach:
- Use device names to seperate out tee-supplicant dependent devices via
this patch.
- Since user-space service is aware about tee-supplicant lifespan, so
allow the user-space service to unbind tee-supplicant dependent
devices before killing the supplicant. Following command has to be
added to the tee-supplicant service file.
$ for dev in /sys/bus/tee/devices/*; do if [[ "$dev" == *"optee-ta-supp-"* ]]; \
then echo $(basename "$dev") > $dev/driver/unbind; fi done
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 13 ++-----------
drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 13 ++++++++++---
drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 --
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
index d01ca47f7bde..8ee3c71bd989 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
-#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "optee_private.h"
int optee_pool_op_alloc_helper(struct tee_shm_pool *pool, struct tee_shm *shm,
@@ -110,12 +109,7 @@ int optee_open(struct tee_context *ctx, bool cap_memref_null)
if (!optee->scan_bus_done) {
INIT_WORK(&optee->scan_bus_work, optee_bus_scan);
- optee->scan_bus_wq = create_workqueue("optee_bus_scan");
- if (!optee->scan_bus_wq) {
- kfree(ctxdata);
- return -ECHILD;
- }
- queue_work(optee->scan_bus_wq, &optee->scan_bus_work);
+ schedule_work(&optee->scan_bus_work);
optee->scan_bus_done = true;
}
}
@@ -159,10 +153,7 @@ void optee_release_supp(struct tee_context *ctx)
struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev);
optee_release_helper(ctx, optee_close_session_helper);
- if (optee->scan_bus_wq) {
- destroy_workqueue(optee->scan_bus_wq);
- optee->scan_bus_wq = NULL;
- }
+
optee_supp_release(&optee->supp);
}
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
index 64f0e047c23d..78fc0a15c463 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
@@ -60,9 +60,10 @@ static void optee_release_device(struct device *dev)
kfree(optee_device);
}
-static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid)
+static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid, u32 func)
{
struct tee_client_device *optee_device = NULL;
+ const char *dev_name_fmt = NULL;
int rc;
optee_device = kzalloc(sizeof(*optee_device), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -71,7 +72,13 @@ static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid)
optee_device->dev.bus = &tee_bus_type;
optee_device->dev.release = optee_release_device;
- if (dev_set_name(&optee_device->dev, "optee-ta-%pUb", device_uuid)) {
+
+ if (func == PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP)
+ dev_name_fmt = "optee-ta-supp-%pUb";
+ else
+ dev_name_fmt = "optee-ta-%pUb";
+
+ if (dev_set_name(&optee_device->dev, dev_name_fmt, device_uuid)) {
kfree(optee_device);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -142,7 +149,7 @@ static int __optee_enumerate_devices(u32 func)
num_devices = shm_size / sizeof(uuid_t);
for (idx = 0; idx < num_devices; idx++) {
- rc = optee_register_device(&device_uuid[idx]);
+ rc = optee_register_device(&device_uuid[idx], func);
if (rc)
goto out_shm;
}
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
index 6dcecb83c893..af4aa266c3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ struct optee_ops {
* @pool: shared memory pool
* @rpc_param_count: If > 0 number of RPC parameters to make room for
* @scan_bus_done flag if device registation was already done.
- * @scan_bus_wq workqueue to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
* @scan_bus_work workq to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
*/
struct optee {
@@ -212,7 +211,6 @@ struct optee {
struct tee_shm_pool *pool;
unsigned int rpc_param_count;
bool scan_bus_done;
- struct workqueue_struct *scan_bus_wq;
struct work_struct scan_bus_work;
};
--
2.34.1
In a virtual environment, an application running in guest VM may want
to delegate security sensitive tasks to a Trusted Application (TA)
running within a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). A TEE is a trusted
OS running in some secure environment, for example, TrustZone on ARM
CPUs, or a separate secure co-processor etc.
A virtual TEE device emulates a TEE within a guest VM. Such a virtual
TEE device supports multiple operations such as:
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_OPEN_DEVICE – Open a communication channel with virtio
TEE device.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CLOSE_DEVICE – Close communication channel with virtio
TEE device.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_GET_VERSION – Get version of virtio TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_OPEN_SESSION – Open a session to communicate with
trusted application running in TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CLOSE_SESSION – Close a session to end communication
with trusted application running in TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_INVOKE_FUNC – Invoke a command or function in trusted
application running in TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CANCEL_REQ – Cancel an ongoing command within TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_REGISTER_MEM - Register shared memory with TEE.
VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_UNREGISTER_MEM - Unregister shared memory from TEE.
We would like to reserve device ID 46 for Virtio-TEE device.
Signed-off-by: Jeshwanth Kumar <jeshwanthkumar.nk(a)amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas(a)amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav(a)nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org>
---
content.tex | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
index 0a62dce..644aa4a 100644
--- a/content.tex
+++ b/content.tex
@@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types}
\hline
45 & SPI master \\
\hline
+46 & TEE device \\
+\hline
\end{tabular}
Some of the devices above are unspecified by this document,
--
2.25.1
There is a potential race condition in amdtee_close_session that may
cause use-after-free in amdtee_open_session. For instance, if a session
has refcount == 1, and one thread tries to free this session via:
kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
the reference count will get decremented, and the next step would be to
call destroy_session(). However, if in another thread,
amdtee_open_session() is called before destroy_session() has completed
execution, alloc_session() may return 'sess' that will be freed up
later in destroy_session() leading to use-after-free in
amdtee_open_session.
To fix this issue, treat decrement of sess->refcount and removal of
'sess' from session list in destroy_session() as a critical section, so
that it is executed atomically.
Fixes: 757cc3e9ff1d ("tee: add AMD-TEE driver")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas(a)amd.com>
---
v2:
* Introduced kref_put_mutex() as suggested by Sumit Garg.
drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c b/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
index 372d64756ed6..3c15f6a9e91c 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
@@ -217,12 +217,12 @@ static int copy_ta_binary(struct tee_context *ctx, void *ptr, void **ta,
return rc;
}
+/* mutex must be held by caller */
static void destroy_session(struct kref *ref)
{
struct amdtee_session *sess = container_of(ref, struct amdtee_session,
refcount);
- mutex_lock(&session_list_mutex);
list_del(&sess->list_node);
mutex_unlock(&session_list_mutex);
kfree(sess);
@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@ int amdtee_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
if (arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS) {
pr_err("open_session failed %d\n", arg->ret);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
- kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ kref_put_mutex(&sess->refcount, destroy_session,
+ &session_list_mutex);
goto out;
}
@@ -290,7 +291,8 @@ int amdtee_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
pr_err("reached maximum session count %d\n", TEE_NUM_SESSIONS);
handle_close_session(ta_handle, session_info);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
- kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ kref_put_mutex(&sess->refcount, destroy_session,
+ &session_list_mutex);
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
@@ -331,7 +333,7 @@ int amdtee_close_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 session)
handle_close_session(ta_handle, session_info);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
- kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ kref_put_mutex(&sess->refcount, destroy_session, &session_list_mutex);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
There is a potential race condition in amdtee_close_session that may
cause use-after-free in amdtee_open_session. For instance, if a session
has refcount == 1, and one thread tries to free this session via:
kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
the reference count will get decremented, and the next step would be to
call destroy_session(). However, if in another thread,
amdtee_open_session() is called before destroy_session() has completed
execution, alloc_session() may return 'sess' that will be freed up
later in destroy_session() leading to use-after-free in
amdtee_open_session.
To fix this issue, treat decrement of sess->refcount and invocation of
destroy_session() as a single critical section, so that it is executed
atomically.
Fixes: 757cc3e9ff1d ("tee: add AMD-TEE driver")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas(a)amd.com>
---
drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c b/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
index 372d64756ed6..04cee03bec9d 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c
@@ -217,14 +217,13 @@ static int copy_ta_binary(struct tee_context *ctx, void *ptr, void **ta,
return rc;
}
+/* mutex must be held by caller */
static void destroy_session(struct kref *ref)
{
struct amdtee_session *sess = container_of(ref, struct amdtee_session,
refcount);
- mutex_lock(&session_list_mutex);
list_del(&sess->list_node);
- mutex_unlock(&session_list_mutex);
kfree(sess);
}
@@ -272,7 +271,9 @@ int amdtee_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
if (arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS) {
pr_err("open_session failed %d\n", arg->ret);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
+ mutex_lock(&session_list_mutex);
kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ mutex_unlock(&session_list_mutex);
goto out;
}
@@ -290,7 +291,9 @@ int amdtee_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
pr_err("reached maximum session count %d\n", TEE_NUM_SESSIONS);
handle_close_session(ta_handle, session_info);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
+ mutex_lock(&session_list_mutex);
kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ mutex_unlock(&session_list_mutex);
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
@@ -331,7 +334,9 @@ int amdtee_close_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 session)
handle_close_session(ta_handle, session_info);
handle_unload_ta(ta_handle);
+ mutex_lock(&session_list_mutex);
kref_put(&sess->refcount, destroy_session);
+ mutex_unlock(&session_list_mutex);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
+cc OP-TEE ML
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 13:47, Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas(a)amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/26/2023 1:19 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 12:53, Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas(a)amd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/26/2023 12:14 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>> +cc Alex
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 08:16, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> [+cc Arnd]
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 8:00 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +cc Jens
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In a virtual environment, an application running in guest VM may want
> >>>>>> to delegate security sensitive tasks to a Trusted Application (TA)
> >>>>>> running within a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). A TEE is a trusted
> >>>>>> OS running in some secure environment, for example, TrustZone on ARM
> >>>>>> CPUs, or a separate secure co-processor etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have been exploring this area quite recently with an effort to have a common VIRIO interface which can support different trusted OS implementations. I guess you intend to test it with AMD-TEE, right? Any plans to test it with OP-TEE? As currently we have these two supported upstream.
> >>>>>
> >> Yes, we have tested with AMD-TEE. We have not yet tested with OP-TEE. Sure, we will try it out.
> >
> > Glad to hear that. I can help get it tested with OP-TEE as well.
> >
>
> We will test it out internally. Shall let you know in case we need help.
>
> >>
> >>>>> Do you currently have any virtio frontend/backend implementations for this?
> >>>>>
> >>
> >> Yes, we have. Frontend is a Linux virtio-TEE driver, and backend is virtio-TEE device emulated in QEMU.
> >> We used the Xen hypervisor.
> >
> > Can you share corresponding references? I can give it a try using Qemu with KVM.
> >
>
> We will share it in next couple of weeks. We have not yet hosted the code for external consumption.
>
> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A virtual TEE device emulates a TEE within a guest VM. Such a virtual
> >>>>>> TEE device supports multiple operations such as:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_OPEN_DEVICE – Open a communication channel with virtio
> >>>>>> TEE device.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CLOSE_DEVICE – Close communication channel with virtio
> >>>>>> TEE device.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_GET_VERSION – Get version of virtio TEE.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_OPEN_SESSION – Open a session to communicate with
> >>>>>> trusted application running in TEE.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CLOSE_SESSION – Close a session to end communication
> >>>>>> with trusted application running in TEE.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_INVOKE_FUNC – Invoke a command or function in trusted
> >>>>>> application running in TEE.
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_CANCEL_REQ – Cancel an ongoing command within TEE.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How about shared memory support? We would like to register guest pages with the trusted OS.
> >> We have a command VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_REGISTER_MEM for registering shared memory buffer with Trusted OS.
> >
> > I suppose the commit message has to be appended then. Do you have the
> > draft virtio-tee device specification ready for review? I would be
> > interested to review that.
> >
>
> Yes, the command is missed out in the commit message.
With the commit message updated to include support for shared memory,
feel free to add:
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)linaro.org>
>
> We are in the process of preparing virtio-tee device specification. We will be sending it out to this
> list.
I would also suggest you to CC: op-tee(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org for review.
>
> >>
> >> In this command, the guest pages are copied into a shadow buffer in the host OS. And this shadow
> >> buffer is mapped with Trusted OS. So, buffer-copy is involved.
> >>
> >> One limitation, that we had was that the guest pages were non-contiguous. So, the number of physical
> >> pages that had to be mapped with Trusted OS was exceeding 64 entries when we were testing out the
> >> registering of guest pages. AMD-TEE Trusted OS can map a physically non-contiguous buffer, but the
> >> number of sg entries for such a buffer must be less than 64. So, we resorted to using a shadow buffer
> >> that is allocated within host, and gets mapped with Trusted OS.
> >
> > I don't think OP-TEE OS has such a limitation on non-contiguous pages.
> > So I would suggest you to keep VIRTIO_TEE_CMD_REGISTER_MEM as part of
> > the ABI. It can be an optional feature for a particular trusted OS
> > implementation to support.
> >
>
> Currently, the reg_mem (register memory) control is dictated by a flag in virtio-tee qemu code. This flag
> for our testing was hard-coded as false. We will enhance our code, so that it is configurable. The value
> of reg_mem shall be set to true/false depending upon whether the underlying TEE driver reports TEE_GEN_CAP_REG_MEM.
Sounds good to me.
-Sumit
>
> Thanks,
> Rijo
>
> > -Sumit
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rijo
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Coincidently Arnd and I (among others) discussed this in person last
> >>>> week and the conclusion was that only temporary shared memory is
> >>>> possible with virtio. So the shared memory has to be set up and torn
> >>>> down by the host during each operation, typically open-session or
> >>>> invoke-func.
> >>>
> >>> Agree as I was part of those discussions. But I would like to
> >>> understand the reasoning behind it. Is there any restriction by VIRTIO
> >>> specification that we can't register guest page PAs to a device (TEE
> >>> in our case) to allow for zero copy transfers?
> >>>
> >>> Alex mentioned some references to virtio GPU device. I suppose I need
> >>> to dive into its implementation to see if there are any similarities
> >>> to our use-case.
> >>>
> >>>> That might not be optimal if trying to maximize
> >>>> performance, but it is portable.
> >>>
> >>> IMO, the ABI should be flexible enough to support a TEE with optimum
> >>> performance.
> >>>
> >>> -Sumit
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Jens
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Sumit
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> We would like to reserve device ID 46 for Virtio-TEE device.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeshwanth Kumar <jeshwanthkumar.nk(a)amd.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> content.tex | 2 ++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> >>>>>> index 0a62dce..644aa4a 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/content.tex
> >>>>>> +++ b/content.tex
> >>>>>> @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types}
> >>>>>> \hline
> >>>>>> 45 & SPI master \\
> >>>>>> \hline
> >>>>>> +46 & TEE device \\
> >>>>>> +\hline
> >>>>>> \end{tabular}
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some of the devices above are unspecified by this document,
Hi
Today Tuesday, September 26 it's time for another LOC monthly meeting.
Sorry for the short notice. For
time and connection details see the calendar at
https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/
I have a few items for the agenda:
- Firmware handoff in OP-TEE https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/6308
- We've started to upstream a few PRs that will require bumping the
major version to 4
Any other topics?
Thanks,
Jens