Hi All,
We are pleased to announce the formal release of Trusted Firmware-A version 2.10 bundle of project deliverables.
This includes Trusted Firmware-A, Trusted Firmware-A Tests, Hafnium, RMM and TF-A OpenCI Scripts/Jobs 2.10 releases involving the tagging of multiple repositories.
These went live on 22nd November 2023.
Please find references to tags and change logs at the end of this email.
Many thanks to the community for the active engagement in delivering this release!
Notable Features of the Version 2.10 Release are as follows:
TF-A/EL3 Root World
* New Features:
* Firmware handoff library support
* Improvements to BL31 runtime exception handling
* Context management refactoring for RME/4 worlds
* Gelas, Nevis & Travis CPUs support
* V8.9 features enabled (FEAT_ HAFT, RPRFM, LRCPC3, MTE_PERM)
TF-A Boot BL1/BL2
* New Features
* Trusted Boot support for ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm)
* Migrated to PSA crypto API’s
* Improved the GUID Partition Table (GPT) parser.
* Various security Improvements and threat Model updates for ARM CCA
* Signer id extraction Implementation
Hafnium/SEL2 SPM
* New Features:
* FF-A v1.2: FFA_YIELD with time-out; EL3 SPMDs LSPs communication; memory sharing updates.
* Memory region relative base address field support in SP manifests.
* Interrupt re-configuration hypervisor calls.
* Memory management: S2 PT NS/S IPA split
* SMCCCv1.2+ compliance fixes.
* Feature parity test improvements, EL3 SPMC and Hafnium (S-EL2 SPMC)
TF-RMM/REL2
* New Feature/Support
* Fenimore v1.0 EAC5 aligned implementation.
* TFTF Enhancements for RME testing
* Initial CBMC support
* NS SME support in RMM
* BTI support for RMM
Errata
* Errata implemented (1xCortex-X2/ Matterhorn-ELP, 1xCortex-A710/Matterhorn, 1xNeoverse N2/Perseus, 2xNeoverse V2/Demeter, Makalu ELP/Cortex X3, Klein/Cortex-A510)
* Fix some minor defects with version in a few errata that applies for some follow up revisions of the CPUs. (Neoverse V1, Cortex-X2, Cortex-A710)
TF-A Tests
* Core
* Added errata management firmware interface tests.
* Added firmware handoff tests.
* Introduced RAS KFH support test.
* SPM/FF-A
* Support SMCCCv1.2 extended GP registers set.
* Test SMCCC compliance at the non-secure physical instance.
* Test secure eSPI interrupt handling.
* Test FF-A v1.2 FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_REGS interface.
* RMM
* Added FPU/SVE/SME tests
* Added multiple REC single CPU tests.
* Added PAuth support in Realms tests.
* Added PMU tests.
Platform Support
* New platforms added:
* Aspeed AST2700, NXP IMX93, Intel Agilex5, Nuvoton NPCM845x, QTI MDM9607, MSM8909, MSM8939, ST STM32MP2
Release tags across repositories:
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/tf-a-tests.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-ci-scripts.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-job-configs.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/hafnium/hafnium.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-ci-scripts.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-job-configs.git/tag/?h=v2.10https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-RMM/tf-rmm.git/tag/?h=tf-rmm-v0.4.0
Change logs:
https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/v2.10/change-log.html#id1https://trustedfirmware-a-tests.readthedocs.io/en/v2.10/change-log.html#ver…https://hafnium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/change-log.html#v2-10https://tf-rmm.readthedocs.io/en/tf-rmm-v0.4.0/about/change-log.html#v0-4-0
Regards,
Olivier.
Hi All,
The next release of the Firmware-A bundle of projects tagged v2.10 has an expected code freeze date of Nov, 7th 2023.
Refer to the Release Cadence section from TF-A documentation (https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/tree/docs/about…).
Closing out the release takes around 6-10 working days after the code freeze.
Preparations tasks for v2.10 release should start in coming month.
We want to ensure that planned feature patches for the release are submitted in good time for the review process to conclude. As a kind recommendation and a matter of sharing CI resources, please launch CI jobs with care e.g.:
-For simple platform, docs changes, or one liners, use Allow-CI+1 label (no need for a full Allow-CI+2 run).
-For large patch stacks use Allow-CI+2 at top of the patch stack (and if required few individual Allow+CI+1 in the middle of the patch stack).
-Carefully analyze results and fix the change if required, before launching new jobs on the same change.
-If after issuing a Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label a Build start notice is not added as a gerrit comment on the patch right away please be patient as under heavy load CI jobs can be queued and in extreme conditions it can be over an hour before the Build start notice is issued. Issuing another Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label will just result in an additional job being queued.
Thanks & Regards,
Olivier.
Hi all,
I'm testing FF-A notifications with OP-TEE and Hafnium. I'm using
interrupts from the secure uart as a trigger to set a notification for
the normal world. Sometimes when testing I run into:
VERBOSE: Secure virtual interrupt not yet serviced by SP 8001.
FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP interrupted
Hafnium then returns an FFA_ERROR (code -5) as a response to the
FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP OP-TEE was just exiting with. After some
digging in the code I find a comment at the top of
plat_ffa_is_direct_response_interrupted()
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/hafnium/hafnium.git/tree/src/arch/aarch64/p…
/*
* A secure interrupt might trigger while the target SP is currently
* running to send a direct response. SPMC would then inject virtual
* interrupt to vCPU of target SP and resume it.
* However, it is possible that the S-EL1 SP could have its interrupts
* masked and hence might not handle the virtual interrupt before
* sending direct response message. In such a scenario, SPMC must
* return an error with code FFA_INTERRUPTED to inform the S-EL1 SP of
* a pending interrupt and allow it to be handled before sending the
* direct response.
*/
The specification doesn't mention this as a valid error code for
FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP. Is this something we can expect to be added
to the specification or at least something OP-TEE has to be prepared
to handle regardless?
As far as I can tell there's no way of guaranteeing that Hafnium will
not return this error for FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP. Even if we were
able to execute the smc instruction with secure interrupts unmasked,
what if the interrupt is raised just after the smc instruction has
been trapped in Hafnium?
It is a bit inconvenient as it means saving the registers passed to
the smc instruction to be able to restart the smc instruction with the
same arguments. It seems we may need to redesign the exit procedure.
It would be nice with an example of how an S-EL1 SP is supposed to
exit with FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Jens
