On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 01:34:44PM +0100, Soby Mathew wrote:
Hi Jaehyeon, We haven’t created a shrinkwrap overlay for the MEC branches mentioned below. These branches were pushed to help prototyping efforts in various components involved. There could be several possibilities why Realm launch failed including incorrect options to lkvm tool.
Adding Jean Philippe to the thread in case there are some instructions available for consuming these branches.
Nothing comes to mind, sorry, I haven't written any documentation yet. For reference I've used the following model parameters when working on MEC:
-C cluster0.mec_support_level: 2 -C cluster0.rme_mecid_width: 16 -C cluster1.mec_support_level: 2 -C cluster1.rme_mecid_width: 16 -C bp.mpe.enable: 1 -C cluster0.output_attributes: ExtendedID[62:55]=MPAM_PMG,ExtendedID[38]=MPAM_SP[0],ExtendedID[37]=MPAM_SP[1],UserFlags[31:16]=MECID -C cluster1.output_attributes: ExtendedID[62:55]=MPAM_PMG,ExtendedID[38]=MPAM_SP[0],ExtendedID[37]=MPAM_SP[1],UserFlags[31:16]=MECID -C bp.mpe.output_attributes_parameter_of_core: ExtendedID[62:55]=MPAM_PMG,ExtendedID[38]=MPAM_SP[0],ExtendedID[37]=MPAM_SP[1],UserFlag
Apologies, the last line is: -C bp.mpe.output_attributes_parameter_of_core: ExtendedID[62:55]=MPAM_PMG,ExtendedID[38]=MPAM_SP[0],ExtendedID[37]=MPAM_SP[1],UserFlags[31:16]=MECID
Thanks, Jean