Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the reply. I will create a patch for that and will add you as a reviewer.

Regards,

Bohdan Hunko

Cypress Semiconductor Ukraine

Engineer

CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW

Mobile: +38099 50 19 714
Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com

From: Kevin Peng <Kevin.Peng@arm.com>
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2022 05:22
To: Hunko Bohdan (CSUKR CSS ICW SW FW 3) <Bohdan.Hunko@infineon.com>; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: Brand Chris (CSCA CSS ICW SW PSW 1) <Chris.Brand@infineon.com>; Kamath Dheeraj (CYSC CSS ICW APP IAE) <Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com>
Subject: RE: Service vs Partition wording in manifest files

Caution: This e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you validate it is safe.

Hi Bohdan,

Yes, the names should be “xxx Partition”.

I guess they are called “service” because the first a few “services” are created prior to FF-M and there was no concept of “Partition”.

Only my guess.

Anyway, they should be changed to “Partition”.

Best Regards,

Kevin

From: Bohdan.Hunko--- via TF-M <tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 3:47 AM
To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: Chris.Brand@infineon.com; Dheeraj.Kamath@infineon.com
Subject: [TF-M] Service vs Partition wording in manifest files

Hi everyone,

From what I see manifest lists (e.g. tools/tfm_manifest_list.yaml) describe partitions, but “name” field there (which is a description of the partition) uses “Service” word, for example:

"name": "Protected Storage Service",