Hi Suresh,

 

Secure Enclave and dual-cpu so far only support IPC model.

Therefore Profile Medium and Profile Large can run on SE and dual-cpu platforms.

Besides, Profile Large by default enables Fault Injection Hardening library. It requires platform to support Fault Injection Hardening.

 

The secure firmware binary size may vary with different underlying inter-core communication and assigned resources.

 

Best regards,

Hu Ziji

 

From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Tamas Ban via TF-M
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 3:40 PM
To: Suresh.Marisetty@infineon.com; tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [TF-M] Questions on Musca-B1 SE implementation

 

Hi Suresh,

 

Here is a link how to build images to Musca-B1 SE:
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m.git/tree/platform/ext/target/musca_b1/secure_enclave/readme.rst

 

I have built with GCC and MinSizeRel build type:

 

Profile Medium:

Memory region         Used Size  Region Size  %age Used

           FLASH:      101464 B       381 KB     26.01%

             RAM:       61304 B        64 KB     93.54%

[100%] Built target tfm_s

 

Profile Large:
Memory region         Used Size  Region Size  %age Used

           FLASH:      170448 B       381 KB     43.69%

             RAM:       62980 B        64 KB     96.10%

[ 97%] Built target tfm_s

 

The profiles means different capabilities of TF-M, they were introduced to support constrained devices as well, with limited capability.

 

There is a detailed description about the profiles here:

https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m.git/tree/docs/technical_references/profiles

 

BR,

Tamas

 

From: TF-M <tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org> On Behalf Of Suresh Marisetty via TF-M
Sent: 2021. április 29., csütörtök 21:49
To: tf-m@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: [TF-M] Questions on Musca-B1 SE implementation

 

I am following up on a question that came up on the TFM Core and MCUBoot image sizes that is built for SE on Musca-B1.

 

We are trying to figure out the resource requirements for SE, to be able to host the TF-M as suggested in the slides below. Wondering if anyone throw more light on the RAM/FLASH requirements for it.

 

Also, does the TFM profile small/medium/large map to this at all or is it different from them.  Also, what’s are the estimated  latencies of boot on SE with all the Flash accesses, etc.

 

https://www.trustedfirmware.org/docs/Musca-B1-Secure-Enclave-Solution.pdf

https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-M/trusted-firmware-m.git/tree/platform/ext/target/musca_b1/secure_enclave

 

Any info on this would be appreciated.

 

 

thanks

Suresh Marisetty

Infineon Semiconductor Corporation