On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 16:23 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 21:37, Ludvig Pärsson ludvig.parsson@axis.com wrote:
Currently there is no dependency between the "linaro,scmi-optee" driver and the tee_core. If the scmi-optee driver gets probed before the tee_bus_type is initialized, then we will get an unwanted error print.
What error print do you observe? I suppose this case is already handled by scmi optee driver via -EPROBE_DEFER.
-Sumit
Hi Sumit,
The error print is in driver_register().
This is kind of what happens: scmi_driver_init() scmi_probe() scmi_optee_link_supplier() scmi_optee_init() driver_register() <--- pr_err() if tee_bus_type is not initialized tee_init() <--- tee_bus_type gets initialized here
The scmi_optee_link_supplier() will always return -EPROBE_DEFER the first time because scmi_optee_private is initialized in scmi_optee_service_probe, which is only called after the driver is registered in scmi_optee_init. Right now the driver_register fails because tee_bus_type is not initialized which is printing the unwanted error print. Another side effect of this is that scmi_optee_link_supplier() will return -EPROBE_DEFER a second time, and scmi_probe will be successful the third time instead of the second time.
BR, Ludvig
This patch enables putting scmi-optee nodes as children to the optee node in devicetree, which indirectly creates the missing dependency.
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Pärsson ludvig.parsson@axis.com
drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c index a1c1fa1a9c28..be6f02fd5a7f 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c @@ -1533,6 +1533,11 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (rc) goto err_disable_shm_cache;
+ /* Populate any dependent child node (if any) */ + rc = devm_of_platform_populate(&pdev->dev); + if (rc) + goto err_disable_shm_cache;
pr_info("initialized driver\n"); return 0;
-- 2.30.2